Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2010, 05:43 PM   #61
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Someone's begging for a parrot.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-16-2010, 05:44 PM   #62
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

My head is sufficiently asploded. Got to go to a thread where people are realistic enough to not think of Colt Brennan as a future starter.

There's probably some merit to the thread here, but it's been ruined.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:44 PM   #63
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
So...as per the thread title what about Colt vs. the rookie class? Personally I think there is room for both Colt and a rookie.
It appears that we've hit a time warp and we've been transported back to the beginning of the 2009 season when there was an actual debate about Campbell.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:44 PM   #64
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,384
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by redskins202 View Post
I'm sorry so than why hasn't Jason Candle been re-sign yet my good sir?
Would you like for me to show you stats of when Campbell is out and in and how good Santana Moss produces more sir?

And your criticism is back in 08 when every one should have known Jason wasnt that impressive.
JC hasn't been re-signed because he hasn't proven himself a franchise QB. Everyone agrees on that.

He hasn't been released because he isn't the only reason we were 4-12. Most everyone understands that too.

What Shanahan does with him now will depend on what MS wants as a future qb. And only MS can answer that one, I am sure we will have a far better idea after this draft.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:46 PM   #65
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Oh please. His argument is nothing that a "you're dumb" or a "that's stupid" can't sufficiently answer. Your work here mining for the acceptance of a noob who can barely type in sentences is so weak.

The reason the argument sucks is because it's based on not a single premise. It's based on the authoritative word of someone who has been here all of 15 minutes and might be 14 years old.
The single premise is that Jason Campbell sucks, end of story back to Brennan, which is what this thread is about.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams"
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:46 PM   #66
redskins202
Camp Scrub
 
redskins202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 51
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
Couldn't have said it any better my friend. People here just need a change of sceneary. They're still sold on Jason being our QB even though he's played 4 years for us and been here 5 years. I bet you as soon as we get a franchise caliber QB in the draft and he starts performing well people will be saying "Jason Who?" Until then we're still going to be hearing "Hey give Jason a shot," "He hasn't played behind a good OL yet," "Let him be in an offense for more than 2 years," its like people are so sold on this guy that they believe he's like the only QB out there or something, like we can't draft one or trade for one or whatever.
What I hate is there protecting a guy who.

1: Made us be a big part of an 4-12 in the easiest schedule ever. The 05 redskins probably would have gone 14-2 with this schedule.

2: Jason is turning 29 and right now is a free agent who either can be traded or sign off to another team but if at best would be here for one year. They are protecting a QB whos gonna be here for one year????.

3: How is Jason Candle our best option? he's no better than Marc Bulger or Chad Pennington. This guy couldn't even give us a 3rd-4th rounder in his supposed best year in 08. Jets where eyeing him what happend?. They saw the Videos and saw how bad he is. Shanahan see's the videos and knows now we need a QB.


me and you ...will be the best of friends lol.
redskins202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:48 PM   #67
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
The single premise is that Jason Campbell sucks, end of story back to Brennan, which is what this thread is about.
Which is exactly why you've killed the thread.

Colt Brennan's NFL prospects are dead. He's 26, and basically played his way to free agency last preseason. There's a new Sheriff in town, he'll get a workout, and that will be the end of him. Or so I predict.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:49 PM   #68
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
The single premise is that Jason Campbell sucks, end of story back to Brennan, which is what this thread is about.
Well I guess you're glad of this because weren't you the one that early in the season wanted the Redskins to lose so we can have a top 5 pick? If memory serves me right, I used to call you a Cowboys fan.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:49 PM   #69
redskins202
Camp Scrub
 
redskins202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 51
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Quote:
No one is arguing for Jason Campbell to be given a long contract
, what the hell are you talking about? You're just being a moron right now that's bringing up crap that was discussed all of last season.
So your arguing about Campbell being here for one year than?. I mean thats what obviously your saying...part of the reason was every one else but Campbell . I mean its not Campbell fault for a 4-12 record.

Yep. K i see what you mean.
redskins202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:50 PM   #70
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Anyway Brennan deserves a shot just like how Campbell and Collins both got shots last year to be a starting QB, and by a shot I mean he gets to play with the starters and not 2nd/3rd Stringers.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams"
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:51 PM   #71
redskins202
Camp Scrub
 
redskins202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 51
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
No one is sold on Jason Campbell, we're just sick of simple minded people that think a simple change of QB will make us into a Super Bowl contender right away. The only reason Campbell is being brought up, is because some people want us to take a franchise tackle and keep Campbell in the interim until either we can a.) develop a mid-round QB or b.) we can pick up a first-round QB in 2011.
K.............so lets just draft Bradford than. Campbell gonna be here for one year I guess or get traded. So no problems here guess we where mis-understood.
redskins202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:51 PM   #72
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
JC hasn't been re-signed because he hasn't proven himself a franchise QB. Everyone agrees on that.

He hasn't been released because he isn't the only reason we were 4-12. Most everyone understands that too.

What Shanahan does with him now will depend on what MS wants as a future qb. And only MS can answer that one, I am sure we will have a far better idea after this draft.
You and me...we'll be great friends here
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:53 PM   #73
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
Anyway Brennan deserves a shot just like how Campbell and Collins both got shots last year to be a starting QB, and by a shot I mean he gets to play with the starters and not 2nd/3rd Stringers.
Brennan had his shot. Now, Andre Woodson, he didn't get any meaningful gametime here before we moved on. Brennan has been here two preseasons.

It was a 6th round pick that didnt pay off. Won't be the last.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:53 PM   #74
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by redskins202 View Post
So your arguing about Campbell being here for one year than?. I mean thats what obviously your saying...part of the reason was every one else but Campbell . I mean its not Campbell fault for a 4-12 record.

Yep. K i see what you mean.
Yes, I'm arguing for Campbell to be here for just a year, so we can use our resources in our offensive line, since we have an aging left tackle that has a possibly career-ending injury, and a right tackle that has no business being a starter.

However, you insist on attacking Campbell as though someone is calling for him to get an extended contract and that his the franchise QB of the team. No one is arguing that, and you look a bit ridiculous bringing arguments that were debated to death here last fall. So just drop it.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:55 PM   #75
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
Re: Colt Brennan vs Rookie class

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Joke based on a commercial Campbell did for Geico (I think) where they poked fun at him and called him Jason Candle
Okay...I missed that Ad.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.67644 seconds with 10 queries