|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-31-2006, 01:35 PM | #61 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
wayne was franchised so he is out of the question
|
Advertisements |
01-31-2006, 01:52 PM | #62 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I just dont see it as a priority to go and spend money on a big name guy. We have other needs that need to be addressed and spending big money on one guy just doesn't seem to fit. We need depth at o-line and d-line. We need secondary depth, corner and safety. Maybe some depth at TE, although I believe Cooley will play alot more w/ suanders calling the plays. We are going to have to sign a QB also because Ramsey is not going to be here. I would much rather sign quality players at those positions, than sign one big name guy and a bunch of stop gaps or roster fillers. I think the Redskins are spending the money where they need to, offensive coaching. Patten has been, typically through his career, a productive #2 guy. I believe with saunders opening things up and another year under his belt, Patten will be productive. You can give up on a guy because of 1 bad year(Brunell?) Also we have draft picks, plus what ever we get for Ramsey that could be used on a WR that could be productive as a #3 or if we are lucky #2. Plus I believe Cooley will be alot more involved, much like Gonzales was in KC, he would have about 100 catches each year. It sounds nice to say Reggie Wayne, Randel el, Robinson is a Redskin, but I just think the quality of players signed through out the Roster is more important than the superstar lable of one player.
|
01-31-2006, 01:56 PM | #63 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
guys like curtis or robinson won't be big money like wayne or moulds or even r-el (who's overhyped). |
|
01-31-2006, 02:18 PM | #64 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
01-31-2006, 02:42 PM | #65 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Koren Robinson had 22 catches for 347 yards and 1 TD. Hardly a career year, I think he's still damaged goods to the point where he's not going to be able to name his own price and command #1 WR type money.
|
01-31-2006, 04:59 PM | #66 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
01-31-2006, 05:59 PM | #67 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 61
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
i think moulds would be a perfect fit...he has size and speed, with him we have santana, moulds and patton...what a tough match-up for any secondary. i like randel-el....but i think he will stay in pittsburgh.
|
01-31-2006, 08:28 PM | #68 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
01-31-2006, 11:40 PM | #69 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I think people say he had a great year because, considering his past and the type of off-field problems the Vikings had this year, he was Mr. Reliable. He didn't wow you with his numbers but he showed up, played hard, and caused no problems.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
01-31-2006, 11:55 PM | #70 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
let the bears have him. they already have a possession receiver in muhammed. randle el is a younger version of patten. he is a fine player but he is smallish and we need size at at least 1 wideout. |
|
01-31-2006, 11:57 PM | #71 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
01-31-2006, 11:59 PM | #72 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2006, 12:01 AM | #73 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2006, 12:03 AM | #74 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2006, 12:06 AM | #75 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
if he expects that he will sit for a long time. there will have to be safeguards for any team signing him because of the possibility of relapse.. still he has a fine upside and is young. he needs to go to the right team for certain. given how tight the skins are becoming he will need to pass muster from the vets. if he does, look for the skins to make a strong push for him |
|
|
|