Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


The Sam Howell Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2023, 02:41 PM   #721
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,062
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001 View Post
EB will either be the HC here next season or coaching offense/HC somewhere else. I just don't see a HC coming in and not bringing someone with him that he has worked with himself. Could be wrong, but I don't see him staying at OC here.

I actually don’t either but you never know. Im just saying i think he should be the OC.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-13-2023, 02:46 PM   #722
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,470
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
He will run it more I’m thinking but he also trusts Sam to be a dude and he has been. BRob has been very good too. Maybe EB doesn’t think the OL is good enough to run the ball much.. idk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It sure seems like he thinks the O-line is good enough to drop back and pass 50 times per game - since week 1 though. I guess he can't see the fact that we are averaging basically 5 yards per carry when we do run the ball.

Whatever, as long as he doesn't get Sam killed... Can't help but wonder though, if we had been running the ball more, controlling the clock more, making less mistakes in the passing game, and not piling up the sacks, if the results of some of these close games wouldn't have been different.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2023, 02:46 PM   #723
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,062
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

G-1 is an absolute good loser and winner and always congratulates us or takes the high road when they beat us. He doesn’t disappear when it’s convenient than rub it in our faces like sandtrap. G-1 brings plenty to the table here.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2023, 03:38 PM   #724
calia
Playmaker
 
calia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,371
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
G-1 is an absolute good loser and winner and always congratulates us or takes the high road when they beat us. He doesn’t disappear when it’s convenient than rub it in our faces like sandtrap. G-1 brings plenty to the table here.
I agree on both counts.
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?"
"I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay
calia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2023, 03:45 PM   #725
sdskinsfan2001
Living Legend
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 41
Posts: 19,463
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

There are other threads.
__________________
Turkish: What's happening with them sausages, Charlie?
Sausage Charlie: Five minutes, Turkish.
Turkish: It was two minutes five minutes ago.
sdskinsfan2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2023, 03:52 PM   #726
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,981
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter View Post
It sure seems like he thinks the O-line is good enough to drop back and pass 50 times per game - since week 1 though. I guess he can't see the fact that we are averaging basically 5 yards per carry when we do run the ball.

Whatever, as long as he doesn't get Sam killed... Can't help but wonder though, if we had been running the ball more, controlling the clock more, making less mistakes in the passing game, and not piling up the sacks, if the results of some of these close games wouldn't have been different.
Agree. And the problem I have is when it’s been brought up, EB’s like he wants to “be and stay aggressive”. Bro a good run game can A) be aggressive and B) cause more aggressive opportunities in the passing game.

Sam is wasting time with the play fakes with 4 to 1 balance. Also, when your offense line is so bad you have to max protect, u are limited.

While EB and Sam have clicked, this offense needs a lot more work. Can EB continue to develop it? I’m not sure
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2023, 04:53 PM   #727
ForkLifter
Camp Scrub
 
ForkLifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Down by the river
Age: 45
Posts: 39
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001 View Post
Forcing a new HC to retain an old OC is a lot more risky than Howell not being able to handle learning a new offense.

Harris hires GM, GM hires HC and scouting department, HC hires coaching staff.

That has to be the only order. Otherwise, we're doing it ass-backwards Snyder style right off of the bat.
I'm not sure there is a single head coach in recent NFL history, other than Belichek, that that handled both the offensive and defensive play calling during games. And he doesn't do either anymore apparently.

If Harris hires a defense oriented head coach (think Ron Rivera 20 years ago or Belichek 30 years ago), that coach might want to retain EB if the offense continues to progress. Assuming the hiring duty is not given to a general manager. But the same line of thinking may apply-- why screw with the offense just when they're starting to "get it."
ForkLifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2023, 07:06 PM   #728
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,062
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001 View Post
There are other threads.

Never seen M in that thread. He was referring to football talk.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2023, 07:28 PM   #729
sdskinsfan2001
Living Legend
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 41
Posts: 19,463
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Never seen M in that thread. He was referring to football talk.
My comment still holds, there are other threads lol.

Go Howell!
__________________
Turkish: What's happening with them sausages, Charlie?
Sausage Charlie: Five minutes, Turkish.
Turkish: It was two minutes five minutes ago.
sdskinsfan2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2023, 07:34 PM   #730
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,981
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
G-1 is an absolute loser He doesn’t disappear when it’s convenient than rub it in our faces like sandtrap.
Pretty much
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 11:33 AM   #731
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 35,999
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

After 10 weeks Sam Howell is the leading passer in the NFL... Who would have guessed that???
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 12:18 PM   #732
EdmundDorf
The Starter
 
EdmundDorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK, South
Posts: 1,919
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
After 10 weeks Sam Howell is the leading passer in the NFL... Who would have guessed that???
If you told people that was going to happen at the start of the season, how many would have guessed the W-L correctly? Not many thats for sure
EdmundDorf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 12:18 PM   #733
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,527
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
After 10 weeks Sam Howell is the leading passer in the NFL... Who would have guessed that???
i am assuming by yardage, which he is doing well don't get me wrong, but that stat can be misleading as some QBs have had their BYE weeks and Sam has not
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 01:26 PM   #734
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,981
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

What’s the bigger surprise, Sam Howell playing well as a top 3rd of the league QB or the defense being a bottom five unit in the league?

Also, this draft class being a complete bust so far?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 01:37 PM   #735
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
Re: The Sam Howell Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
What’s the bigger surprise, Sam Howell playing well as a top 3rd of the league QB or the defense being a bottom five unit in the league?

Also, this draft class being a complete bust so far?
Both.

Sam shouldn't be slinging it every single game. It is ridiculous that we don't run the ball and have let our running game get this bad. If we had the semblance of a running game, we'd be in much better shape, and Sam would be playing even better.

The defense is, again, a major disappointment. I don't know how JDR still has his job.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.15000 seconds with 10 queries