The Sam Howell Thread

[CapsCommies]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Checks my own join date:



And yes, welcome you Commie bastard (CapsCommies). And LOL at G1.

Thank you, sir. Awaiting the day the team name gets changed again and I fork over the cash to change my user title. Until then, Commies it is.

[AnonEmouse]

I don't think I'd have a problem with EB being HC, I just don't know where he'd get a staff from. And you're right, if a new HC comes in he's likely not going to keep EB. Either way Howell likely has a new OC next year.

[skinsfaninok]

A good QB needs a Good and consistent OC. Letting EB go could screw with Sam

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

A good QB needs a Good and consistent OC. Letting EB go could screw with Sam

Forcing a new HC to retain an old OC is a lot more risky than Howell not being able to handle learning a new offense.

Harris hires GM, GM hires HC and scouting department, HC hires coaching staff.

That has to be the only order. Otherwise, we're doing it ass-backwards Snyder style right off of the bat.

[ForkLifter]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Forcing a new HC to retain an old OC is a lot more risky than Howell not being able to handle learning a new offense.

Harris hires GM, GM hires HC and scouting department, HC hires coaching staff.

That has to be the only order. Otherwise, we're doing it ass-backwards Snyder style right off of the bat.

I'm not sure there is a single head coach in recent NFL history, other than Belichek, that that handled both the offensive and defensive play calling during games. And he doesn't do either anymore apparently.

If Harris hires a defense oriented head coach (think Ron Rivera 20 years ago or Belichek 30 years ago), that coach might want to retain EB if the offense continues to progress. Assuming the hiring duty is not given to a general manager. But the same line of thinking may apply-- why screw with the offense just when they're starting to "get it."

[punch it in]

G-1 is an absolute good loser and winner and always congratulates us or takes the high road when they beat us. He doesn’t disappear when it’s convenient than rub it in our faces like sandtrap. G-1 brings plenty to the table here.

[calia]

Originally Posted by punch it in

G-1 is an absolute good loser and winner and always congratulates us or takes the high road when they beat us. He doesn’t disappear when it’s convenient than rub it in our faces like sandtrap. G-1 brings plenty to the table here.

I agree on both counts.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by punch it in

G-1 is an absolute loser He doesn’t disappear when it’s convenient than rub it in our faces like sandtrap.

Pretty much

[sdskinsfan2001]

There are other threads.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

There are other threads.

Never seen M in that thread. He was referring to football talk.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Never seen M in that thread. He was referring to football talk.

My comment still holds, there are other threads lol.

Go Howell!

[skinsfaninok]

After 10 weeks Sam Howell is the leading passer in the NFL... Who would have guessed that???

[EdmundDorf]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

After 10 weeks Sam Howell is the leading passer in the NFL... Who would have guessed that???

If you told people that was going to happen at the start of the season, how many would have guessed the W-L correctly? Not many thats for sure

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

After 10 weeks Sam Howell is the leading passer in the NFL... Who would have guessed that???

i am assuming by yardage, which he is doing well don't get me wrong, but that stat can be misleading as some QBs have had their BYE weeks and Sam has not

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by mredskins

i am assuming by yardage, which he is doing well don't get me wrong, but that stat can be misleading as some QBs have had their BYE weeks and Sam has not

He would still be top 4 in yardage if he had and that would entail that stroud, tua, and goff all have 200-280 yards passing in their games during Sams bye.
Mahommes and Dak would need to have huge games to catch him and nobody else would. Even in TD’s he would be top 5 with an even amount of games.
So it maybe a little misleading but he would still be top 3-5.