The Most Fresh & Cordial Political Thread Ever

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by nonniey

What is your definition of an anti-abortion law?

And who is the you you are talking to?

Any thing that infringes on the ability of a Women having the ability to make a decision on what to do or have done to their own body.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Giantone

They said it's established Law and no need to be revisited.

Do you have quotes/sources for this, where they said this specifically said this during their confirmation hearings?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Do you have quotes/sources for this, where they said this specifically said this during their confirmation hearings?

Look it up.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Do you have quotes/sources for this, where they said this specifically said this during their confirmation hearings?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trum...ry?id=84470384

"The Supreme Court of the United States has held that Roe v. Wade, that a fetus is not a person for purposes of the 14th Amendment. And the book explains that," Gorsuch replied.
"That's the law of the land, I accept the law of the land, senator. Yes," Gorsuch replied.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Giantone

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trum...ry?id=84470384

"The Supreme Court of the United States has held that Roe v. Wade, that a fetus is not a person for purposes of the 14th Amendment. And the book explains that," Gorsuch replied.
"That's the law of the land, I accept the law of the land, senator. Yes," Gorsuch replied.

Accepting the law of the land that was the law at that specific time is not the same thing as saying the law could never be changed in the future.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Accepting the law of the land that was the law at that specific time is not the same thing as saying the law could never be changed in the future.

LOL, wow. Serious trump right there!

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Giantone

LOL, wow.

Laugh all you want to. Doesn't change the point. He never said he would never make any future ruling that would overturn Roe vs. Wade.

[nonniey]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Any thing that infringes on the ability of a Women having the ability to make a decision on what to do or have done to their own body.

Then one can't say a majority of Americans oppose that, because a rather large majority do in fact support restrictions.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Giantone

See my question is what if it's the Republican Judges clerk that leak it? Will there still be outrage? Public has a right to know.

Could be anyone Republican and of course there will be. They will just be called traitor and dem lover and blah blah blah by the cult.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Could be anyone Republican and of course there will be. They will just be called traitor and dem lover and blah blah blah by the cult.

Almost sounds like you are proud of it getting leaked. Doesn't matter who did it, it was not supposed to happen, and should not have happened.

I'm not frothing at the mouth, not even really upset about it at all, but I'm certainly not going to act like it was a good thing or the right thing to do.

The left loves precedents, well, this sure sets an awful one.

Whenever the actual leaker's name comes out, he/she will become a cult hero to the left.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Any thing that infringes on the ability of a Women having the ability to make a decision on what to do or have done to their own body.

so can a woman:
Inject heroin in her body?
Commit suicide?
Get drunk and kill another driver?
or any of a thousand other things that we as human beings have said are not overridden by the collective law of the land.

The false narrative around women and the right to control their own body is astoundingly simplistic.

Human life is the first right, from which all other rights derive. When a sperm and egg combine and develop, a human life is created, and should be endowed with all the rights, including a right to life. That right should supercede a woman (or man's) right to commit murder through abortion.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Laugh all you want to. Doesn't change the point. He never said he would never make any future ruling that would overturn Roe vs. Wade.

You know what's a great way to make sure America never prospers again? Have the ruling party focus on undoing what the last ruling party did every time it changes hands. That's where we're at now.

[Giantone]

Here we go the ignorant right wing nuts out of the closet again.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by nonniey

Then one can't say a majority of Americans oppose that, because a rather large majority do in fact support restrictions.

Actual no , no they don't. Gun control yes , abortions .....no.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Here we go the ignorant right wing nuts out of the closet again.

Democrats are going with “no limits to abortion” up to the moment of birth

Exactly who is nuts?

That stance is extremely unpopular per polling. So start with stating either you agree or disagree with abortion up to the moment of birth.