|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-08-2008, 07:16 PM | #46 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Colt Brennan
Yes, he certainly was in college. He is also our 3rd string QB right now. If he is currently so mobile, strong armed, accurate, and energetic, why is it that he hasn't even been able to win the #2 job over a 38 year old, mild mannered, quiet, lead footed, mediocre-armed QB? Exactly.
__________________
Tardy |
Advertisements |
12-08-2008, 07:21 PM | #47 | ||
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
|
Re: Colt Brennan
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn. |
||
12-08-2008, 07:32 PM | #48 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Colt Brennan
Quote:
Starting to become stupid? It's been stupid for a long time. Just on the flip side of what you're thinking. WTF has Colt done? You didn't answer the question. Why should he even get sniff of the starting job if he's not even good enough to beat out Collins for the #2??? Jason was in the conversation as a pro-bowl/MVP type player this year before the line starting giving way and Portis got so beat up. He's completing nearly 64% of his passes, his rating is almost 10 points higher than last season, and he has nearly twice as many TDs as INTs. He's not setting the world on fire, but that's so much more the function of a new, complex offense (and a ton of dropped balls) than it is his play. I wonder why there is no one with a football IQ over 15 suggesting Colt Brennan should be starting? Exactly. Barring injuries to Collins and Campbell or a trade to a desperate team, that "shot" you speak of for Colt won't be coming any time soon. Don't hold your breath.
__________________
Tardy |
|
12-08-2008, 07:38 PM | #49 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Colt Brennan
GMScud:
You plead in vain for thoughtful posts laying out the the reasons why Colt should start. Support for Colt usually amounts to an attack on Jason and barely decipherable statements like "Colt's name is kewl" and "just you wait and see." I have yet to hear anyone articulate a reasonable and well-supported argument in favor of Colt. |
12-08-2008, 07:42 PM | #50 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Colt Brennan
Quote:
I have a feeling I'll get neither.
__________________
Tardy |
|
12-08-2008, 07:51 PM | #51 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
|
Re: Colt Brennan
Quote:
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn. |
|
12-08-2008, 08:06 PM | #52 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Colt Brennan
Quote:
64% isn't stellar, but it is pretty darn good,and he's improving from last season and the season before that. Sure he had a great backfield at Auburn, but he was a big reason his team went 13-0 and I believe he was named the best senior QB in the country. Look, I don't think JC is flawless either, but you really think Colt doesn't have a ton more faults at this point as far as the pro game is concerned?? Colt may be good in a few seasons and warrant a shot. He may not. Either way, he won't be getting a look any time soon. People may argue that he should, but it ain't happening. I wouldn't bet the house that Campbell will be a multiple pro-bowler either, but at this point he has a much better shot at that than Colt. I don't think anyone around here is a Colt Brennan hater (in reference to your signature). I'm thrilled to have the kid on our team. I just think the suggestion that he's a better option for us than Jason this year or next is kinda dumb.
__________________
Tardy |
|
12-08-2008, 08:30 PM | #53 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Colt Brennan
Executive decision... no more Colt threads for now.
|
|
|