Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


There's No Quarterback Controversy

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2008, 12:42 AM   #46
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

^^^ Sorry for the freak-out. I just keep seeing that people aren't acknowledging what/who we have at the HC position.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-02-2008, 12:52 AM   #47
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Wasn't there a thread a couple of weeks ago about how we should hurry up and sign Jason to a big contract? Seems like fans want to either hurry up and sign him or hurry up and bench him. Instant gratification in football is a myth. It doesn't work. Danny tried that his first few years as owner. We have a first year coach and a QB playing in a new system. Let's get some linemen and keep building. The NY fans were ready to dump Eli long time ago. Not so much now.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 12:53 AM   #48
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by 53Fan View Post
Wasn't there a thread a couple of weeks ago about how we should hurry up and sign Jason to a big contract? Seems like fans want to either hurry up and sign him or hurry up and bench him. Instant gratification in football is a myth. It doesn't work. Danny tried that his first few years as owner. We have a first year coach and a QB playing in a new system. Let's get some linemen and keep building. The NY fans were ready to dump Eli long time ago. Not so much now.
Good post, and just to quote JLC one last time I think he echos the same view pretty well here:

Quote:
I find it odd that a team that has over-achieved in terms of its record in the eyes of many, is allegedly being held back by the same QB who was among the top eight in the NFL at the midpoint of the season. I'm not buying it. Not even close. Fundamental issues of personnel and scheme adjustment are overarching principles, and no one player is going to overcome that.

To retard the development of Campbell, again, just to hand the team over to Todd Collins strikes me as absurd. This season, realistically, was never about winning the Super Bowl, or even winning the division. They weren't built for that. It's about building a solid program and growing into an offense and identity on that side of the ball that could stand up over time, and developing a quarterback who has the physical and mental tools to be very good for years to come.

Don't lose sight of that.
Have some patience folks.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 12:54 AM   #49
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by 53Fan View Post
Wasn't there a thread a couple of weeks ago about how we should hurry up and sign Jason to a big contract? Seems like fans want to either hurry up and sign him or hurry up and bench him. Instant gratification in football is a myth. It doesn't work. Danny tried that his first few years as owner. We have a first year coach and a QB playing in a new system. Let's get some linemen and keep building. The NY fans were ready to dump Eli long time ago. Not so much now.
Qb is a thankless job. When you're winning thats because its your job when you lose the guy behind you can do better. Ask Derek Anderson.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 01:00 AM   #50
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
^^^ Sorry for the freak-out. I just keep seeing that people aren't acknowledging what/who we have at the HC position.
Thats alright Goat...you're just "playing" with heart.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 01:05 AM   #51
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Fans are stupid. JC improved alot from last year, give him atleast a year with one system. Sure go get a good backup for competition next camp, but now let him do his thing.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 01:09 AM   #52
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Well if Tom Brady can do it, then everyone should be able to do it. Right?



How about former 1st round picks Santonio Holmes and Heath Miller? Not to mention the fact that Jason Campbell is having a MUCH, MUCH better year than Ben Roethelisberger.



Jake Delhomme doesn't have a bunch of targets, but he's not having a stellar year either. Have you seen any of the Panthers games? Delhomme makes Campbell look like an All-Pro stud.



If you want to compare our QB to the likes of Tom Brady and Drew Brees be prepared to be disappointed year after year.
Great post. Dont you love how people dont respond back when you throw a great argument at them?
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 09:35 AM   #53
rypper11
The Starter
 
rypper11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,228
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by prinzeofmoval View Post
Qb is a thankless job. When you're winning thats because its your job when you lose the guy behind you can do better. Ask Derek Anderson.
Or McNabb. A bad game (or two) does not make a season or a career.
__________________
Playing a kids game for a kings ransom.
rypper11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 11:07 AM   #54
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLW428 View Post
How is JC supposed to get it done without a WR core? Yell at them to get open down feild? Force them to catch the ball? The WRs are the ones that are making JC look worse than he really is.
Funny last year when our no name back up entered the game we did not have a problem with our passing game and moving the ball.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 12:06 PM   #55
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Funny last year when our no name back up entered the game we did not have a problem with our passing game and moving the ball.
As JLC noted in that article, if you compare Collins numbers over those games and Campbell's numbers over the past 4 games they are almost identical! The biggest difference was Portis was running wild at the end of last year and he is injured now.

Seriously guys, anyone who thinks we've got a QB controversy or should be starting Collins or Brennan is just completely clueless. Teams with a WINNING RECORD don't bench their 25 yr old QB (to the genius who said 'play the young guy') who hasn't turned the ball over, hasn't looked like a complete buffoon and hadn't cost the team games.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 12:08 PM   #56
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

From the JLC article:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason LaCanfora
So what are the arguments for Collins?

He's more accurate? Collins completed 63.8 percent of his passes during his four games in the regular season last season. Campbell is completing 63.8 percent of his passes this season. Collins, for all the mystique of those games, threw for 888 yards. Campbell, even given the plight of this offense, has thrown for 826 yards over the past four games, essentially the same thing.

Collins got the ball in the end zone five times down the stretch in 2007, but he, unlike Campbell, wasn't facing three of the better pass-rushing defenses in the four-week span(let's remember the losses came to Pittsburgh, Dallas and the Giants, not exactly the Bengals and Lions). Yes, there are problems in the red zone, but it's a lack of playmakers, not the quarterback.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 12:56 PM   #57
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by charlielyons View Post
they do drop alot of balls(very correct there). all im saying with the playoffs picture looking dark why not take a look at what we have on the bench and not just at QB...in alot of positions
Most of your statements have been far off. First of all we are not out of the play-offs yet. Even if we loss against Baltimore we might not be out of the play-offs. If we win out or atleast only take 1 lose to the AFC. We still might sqeak in. I would rather win out though. So to replace the QB at this time. Would be idiotic. Why because we are still in it. if we were 5-7. Or worse it might be different. But for now. Chill out and lets see if we can adjust and if the O-line can protect JC and the WRs especially the rookies can step up and hodl on to the ball. That's our achilles heel. Hopefully we can get some wind behind us if we win against the Ravens. But saying to replace the QB right now is not a good option and I question many of your statements.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company

Last edited by dmvskinzfan08; 12-02-2008 at 01:02 PM.
dmvskinzfan08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 01:00 PM   #58
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Funny last year when our no name back up entered the game we did not have a problem with our passing game and moving the ball.
Ummm...Is Al Saunders still the Offensive Coordinator..Uh no!! That's why there was no problem. he have been learning "that" offense for almost 10 years. So he knew the ins and out. So to think he can come in his first year and do better than JC is uneducated to say the least. he looked horrible in preseason. JC isn't the most mobile QB. But imagine Collins when the line breaks down as it often does..
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company
dmvskinzfan08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 01:00 PM   #59
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

It would be a huge mistake to replace JC at this point in the season and I am certain that Zorn & Co. wont do it.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 01:12 PM   #60
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Funny last year when our no name back up entered the game we did not have a problem with our passing game and moving the ball.
Different offense, different circumstances, and there were other factors at play than just the QB play.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.88953 seconds with 10 queries