Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-02-2007, 10:45 PM   #46
NM Redskin
The Starter
 
NM Redskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,014
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GridIron26 View Post
Well turns out that the rumor is true.. Check this article out, but I don't think the fo is serious about this tho..

NFL.com - NFL News
Well maybe the coaches know something we don't. I mean they have seen Strahan up close for the last three years. He's a guy in our division you would think the teams would know hgow he'd fit. Does sound like Bruce Smith 2.0 though.
__________________
Despite my solid 40 time and great intangibles I went undrafted AGAIN!
NM Redskin is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-02-2007, 11:10 PM   #47
70Chip
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 53
Posts: 3,048
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DGreene28 View Post
This guy has been a pain in the arse for the Redskins for over a decade. If we could get him in here at a resonable price he would be worth it for the two games vs the Giants alone. He is a very vocal leader who could inspire our team the way the Lavar did last year.

If we could make this happen for the right financials then it would be a no brainer... Strahan has enough in the tank to rotate in at DE and stay fresh this season. Plus it would be worth it to see the look on Giants fans when he dons the burgandy and Gold.
This guy hs never done that much against us. Jansen has gotten the better of him for most of his career. Yes, he has a lot of sacks, but he's not a great football player. If he had played against Jansen every game, he would have about 10 career sacks.

I do agree that Lavar inspired our team last year, by not playing for us.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 11:24 PM   #48
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Everyone was saying that Rice is over the hill and his best days have past. Well Michael Strahan is old and washed up. Why would we sign a guy that is 4 years older then Rice. Synder is an idiot, he is killing this team. I would go after Alex Brown or Rice before I would go after Strahan. The possibility of signing Strahan reminds me a lot of when we signed

Barrow, Armstead, Trotter, Deion Sanders, Dan Wilkinson, Dana Stubblefield, Duckett, Brunell, Brad Johnson, Larry Centers, David Patten, Andre Reed, Troy Vincent, Mike Rumph, Matt Bowen, Trung Canidate, Laveranues Coles, Jeff Posey, Lloyd, Randel El,

Believe me Strahan will fit on this list of under acheivers--over paid players that Snyder brought in.

Here's a list of guys we could have made a move for this year.

Darwin Walker, Kris Jenkins, Tank Johnson, Corey Simon, Alex Brown, Kevin Carter, Ian Scott
Good post.
I don't think Coles belongs in this group though...he was the best wr we had for many a moon...and he got us Moss.

btw- we can still get Tank Johnson...no one has shown interest in him and he's just sitting around doing nothing.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 12:01 AM   #49
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,169
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

I thought hard about Coles and he had one productive season for us. And his last he only had 1 td thrown to him by Clinton Portis for the money he recieved he underachieved. And he was our best reciever because we had Rod Gardner (Who the Redskins got instead of Moss in the first place back in 2001.)
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 12:44 AM   #50
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
I thought hard about Coles and he had one productive season for us. And his last he only had 1 td thrown to him by Clinton Portis for the money he recieved he underachieved. And he was our best reciever because we had Rod Gardner (Who the Redskins got instead of Moss in the first place back in 2001.)
Well, Coles was the best WR we have had in many years until Moss. The combo of receptions and yards we haven't seen since...
04- 90 rec, 950 yds. (Coles)
03- 82 rec, 1204 yds. (Coles)
02- 71 rec, 1006 yds. (Rod Gardner)
01- 57 rec, 664 yrds. (Michael Westbrook)
00- 50 rec, 653 yds. (James Thrash)
99- 65 rec, 1191 yds. (Michael Westbrook)
98- 44 rec, 736 yds. (Michael Westbrook)
97- 49 rec, 474 yds. (Jamie Asher)
96- 52 rec, 1014 yds. (Henry Ellard)
95- 56 rec, 1005 yds. (Henry Ellard)
94- 74 rec, 1397 yds. (Henry Ellard)
93- 58 rec, 638 yds. (Ricky Sanders)
92- 64 rec, 912 yds. (Gary Clark)
91- 70 rec, 1340 yds. (Gary Clark)
90- 75 rec, 1112 yds. (Gary Clark)
89- 86 rec, 1186 yds. (Art Monk)
88- 73 rec, 1148 yds. (Ricky Sanders)
87- 56 rec, 1066 yds. (Gary Clark)
86- 74 rec, 1265 yds. (Gary Clark)
85- 91 rec, 1226 yds. (Art Monk)
84- 106 rec, 1372 yds. (Art Monk)

So as you can see, we hadn't seen those kinds of numbers in terms of receptions since Art Monk in the mid 80's. Coles 03 yards we hadn't seen since Ellard in 94.
Coles was the best wr we had seen in a decade, and I would say, the best we have seen since Clark / Monk.
Also, like I said, he helped us get Moss. Moss had 84 rec, for 1483 yards.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 01:00 AM   #51
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapod View Post
Very true....the 'Skins should start looking for a solid back up to Ladell Betts...looks like Portis and his gimpy ass knee will be an issue all season.
All season?

Someone remind me, how long has training camp been going on? Oh yeah, three days.

I bet it is burning Portis up that his has missed the first few days of camp.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 01:49 AM   #52
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper View Post
All season?

Someone remind me, how long has training camp been going on? Oh yeah, three days.

I bet it is burning Portis up that his has missed the first few days of camp.
He's fine...he's likely not even injured.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 02:06 AM   #53
Crazyhorse1
Registered User
 
Crazyhorse1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 227
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
much worse than that IMO. When Deion was here, he played well, but he was no longer prime time & teams threw his way rather than to champ's side. Strahan is old & coming off injuries, I'm not even sure he would be able to take Daniels' starting job.
I can't see Daniels even competing with Strahan. Strahan's not done. His production probems have been caused by injury, not his motor.
Crazyhorse1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 11:12 AM   #54
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 36
Posts: 5,688
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Article by yahoo. SHows how much money he actually needs. He can't retire for life and do nothing.
Giant headache - NFL - Yahoo! Sports

Looks like money is the most important thing to him right now.
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 12:12 PM   #55
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,169
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno View Post
Well, Coles was the best WR we have had in many years until Moss. The combo of receptions and yards we haven't seen since...
04- 90 rec, 950 yds. (Coles)
03- 82 rec, 1204 yds. (Coles)
02- 71 rec, 1006 yds. (Rod Gardner)
01- 57 rec, 664 yrds. (Michael Westbrook)
00- 50 rec, 653 yds. (James Thrash)
99- 65 rec, 1191 yds. (Michael Westbrook)
98- 44 rec, 736 yds. (Michael Westbrook)
97- 49 rec, 474 yds. (Jamie Asher)
96- 52 rec, 1014 yds. (Henry Ellard)
95- 56 rec, 1005 yds. (Henry Ellard)
94- 74 rec, 1397 yds. (Henry Ellard)
93- 58 rec, 638 yds. (Ricky Sanders)
92- 64 rec, 912 yds. (Gary Clark)
91- 70 rec, 1340 yds. (Gary Clark)
90- 75 rec, 1112 yds. (Gary Clark)
89- 86 rec, 1186 yds. (Art Monk)
88- 73 rec, 1148 yds. (Ricky Sanders)
87- 56 rec, 1066 yds. (Gary Clark)
86- 74 rec, 1265 yds. (Gary Clark)
85- 91 rec, 1226 yds. (Art Monk)
84- 106 rec, 1372 yds. (Art Monk)

So as you can see, we hadn't seen those kinds of numbers in terms of receptions since Art Monk in the mid 80's. Coles 03 yards we hadn't seen since Ellard in 94.
Coles was the best wr we had seen in a decade, and I would say, the best we have seen since Clark / Monk.
Also, like I said, he helped us get Moss. Moss had 84 rec, for 1483 yards.

If we would have drafted Moss in 2001 to begin with instead of Gardner we wouldnt be having this conversation. Coles was not the big name player we wanted him to be for the money we paid him he wasnt consistent. Plus Albert Connell also had 1100 yards that year so in 1999 was the last time we had 2 recievers have legimiate year.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 12:23 PM   #56
Dlyne8r
Impact Rookie
 
Dlyne8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: W. Central Florida
Posts: 581
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
much worse than that IMO. When Deion was here, he played well, but he was no longer prime time & teams threw his way rather than to champ's side. Strahan is old & coming off injuries, I'm not even sure he would be able to take Daniels' starting job.
With all due respect...are kidding me? Neon Deion sucked. I can't recall anything he did that was worthy of the freakin' 8 million he stole from the Redskins. I cringe at the mere mention of him in burgandy & gold.
Dlyne8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 12:30 PM   #57
birdz4gibbs
Special Teams
 
birdz4gibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 370
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

no thanks give me some youth ......we need more rockys,lol

i agree we have enough aged players as it is....
now it seems everyone has the flu cause it,s preseason with all these injuries...
__________________
****go skins*******
birdz4gibbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 12:52 PM   #58
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,544
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dlyne8r View Post
With all due respect...are kidding me? Neon Deion sucked. I can't recall anything he did that was worthy of the freakin' 8 million he stole from the Redskins. I cringe at the mere mention of him in burgandy & gold.
Deion did play well here. Was he worth the $$? Probably not, especially since Brian Mitchell was shown the door to clear up the cap room for him. But that's Snyder's fault. Deion took what was offered to him. You can't blame him for that.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 02:26 PM   #59
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,309
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer View Post
Article by yahoo. SHows how much money he actually needs. He can't retire for life and do nothing.
Giant headache - NFL - Yahoo! Sports

Looks like money is the most important thing to him right now.
He has only himself to blame. Although the judge went a little overbaoard. If he is giving his ex 15 million then why does she need all that money for child support? Complete BS.

This might turn into OJ 2.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 02:38 PM   #60
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
The possibility of signing Strahan reminds me a lot of when we signed

Barrow, Armstead, Trotter, Deion Sanders, Dan Wilkinson, Dana Stubblefield, Duckett, Brunell, Brad Johnson, Larry Centers, David Patten, Andre Reed, Troy Vincent, Mike Rumph, Matt Bowen, Trung Canidate, Laveranues Coles, Jeff Posey, Lloyd, Randel El,
Really? Brad Johnson is probably the last good QB the Skins have had. I think Campbell will be better, but Johnson was a great get for them. The problem was the signing of Jeff George, not Brad Johnson.

Larry Centers was also a beast here. He had 544 and 600 yard receiving seasons while he was here as a fullback. By comparison, Cooley's first 2 years here, he had 1088 yards, he has had consecutive 700+ yard seasons, but throwing Centers under the bus is ridiculous. He was also a pretty damn good blocker.

As for Lloyd and Randle El, I think it's a little early to say that these were bad signings. Who knows? Jason Campbell and his ability to actually throw downfield could see these two as legit threats alongside Santana.

While I agree with the majority of your post, I disagree with some of the guys you're using to indict Dan Snyder.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.44860 seconds with 10 queries