The Redskins Suck!!!!!!

[MTK]

Originally Posted by dgack

Let's go for four pages.

let's not, seriously.

Oh wait, it just did.

This thread sucks.

[irish]

Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha

I have no clue how anyone could say that the Redskins suck after the ran for 200 yards and put up over 400 yards on the Eagles, controlled the clock, and played good defense. While JC made mistakes, he's had 4 games as our QB.

Have you seen the Redskins record this season?

All that talk about rushing yards and time of possession, etc. is loser talk. The redskins lost and that all that matters. They do suck, from top to bottom they suck.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by irish

Have you seen the Redskins record this season?

All that talk about rushing yards and time of possession, etc. is loser talk. The redskins lost and that all that matters. They do suck, from top to bottom they suck.

It's not quite as simple as that, I'm sure even you know that.

Saying something sucks isn't exactly the kind of take we want to encourage on the board. Let's back our posts up with something more meaningful.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by chris36

Hey Carolina has had their entire secondary decimated and they have still been respectable. They have stared our own Christian Morton and he has played well. Another mistake. Anyway, injuries are part of the NFL. We have had allot less than most teams. New England has two new tackles playing with one being a rookie and they are still winning.

This is what I've said all along. Other teams are playing well through injuries.

I whole heartedly believe we currently have playoff talent on this roster. That being said, I put the majority of the blame on the staff for the failure this year.

[irish]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

It's not quite as simple as that, I'm sure even you know that.

Saying something sucks isn't exactly the kind of take we want to encourage on the board. Let's back our posts up with something more meaningful.

It is as simple as that. Wins & losses, thats all that matters in any pro sport. The only reason most redskin fans think otherwise is because the redskins dont win so they have to find victories in other aspects of the game.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by irish

It is as simple as that. Wins & losses, thats all that matters in any pro sport.

Of course, but there are plenty of things we can discuss and analyze that lead to those wins and losses.

'We suck' and 'we rule' posts are a waste of our time.

[The Zimmermans]

The defense let us down again. There is no room for error with these linebackers and secondary. Even if we scored that TD instead of the FG we would have let philly march right down the field immediately afterwards for a game winning drive. All you have to do to beat us is run left 60 times a game. Holdman needs to learn how to shed a block. Other than that, things are peachy.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by The Zimmermans

The defense let us down again. There is no room for error with these linebackers and secondary. Even if we scored that TD instead of the FG we would have let philly march right down the field immediately afterwards for a game winning drive. All you have to do to beat us is run left 60 times a game. Holdman needs to learn how to shed a block. Other than that, things are peachy.

Well, one week it's the defense...the next week it's the offense.

One week people are calling for Brunell's head, well he's been benched. The next week, it's the penalties. Holdman, oh yeah he's been horrible too.

I think one consistant theme we find this year is that play calling has been suspect. I'm not really sure who calls the plays anymore.

[MTK]

Saunders has called the plays all year.

Not sure why some still don't understand this.

[The Zimmermans]

I think the offensive playcalling was very good this week. If we are gonna develop campbell, we HAVE to use him. Handing the ball of 50 times when your losing doesnt send a good message to Jason. He made his mistakes, but he also made his plays. Saunders was somewhat unpredictable this week, and the offense moved the ball all game because of it. He tried using Duckett near the goalline and duckett pusssed out. not Saunders' fault.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Saunders has called the plays all year.

Not sure why some still don't understand this.

No, I understand that. But has Gibbs stepped in to some degree?
Is he telling Al to call this play or that play in certain situations?

[celts32]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Sad isn't it?

rediculous...

[MTK]

Originally Posted by 12thMan

No, I understand that. But has Gibbs stepped in to some degree?
Is he telling Al to call this play or that play in certain situations?

I guess we'll never know for sure but all we've heard is that Saunders is calling the plays and Gibbs does have some veto authority but there's no way to tell when and how often he uses that authority.

Knowing Gibbs and the way he delegates I'd guess it's pretty rare that he would overrule Saunders.

[celts32]

Originally Posted by 12thMan

No, I understand that. But has Gibbs stepped in to some degree?
Is he telling Al to call this play or that play in certain situations?

Gibbs clearly stressed to Saunders that he wants more runs in general and more power runs but that does not mean he is calling specific plays. Gibbs suggestions concern the overall game plan.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I guess we'll never know for sure but all we've heard is that Saunders is calling the plays and Gibbs does have some veto authority but there's no way to tell when and how often he uses that authority.

Knowing Gibbs and the way he delegates I'd guess it's pretty rare that he would overrule Saunders.

But more than Gibbs actually vetoeing anything, I wonder if Al, and I'm reaching on this one, is playing mind games with himself. You know, "I wonder if Gibbs would want this or that play in this situation?" So I'll call what Joe would call, instead of what I feel we should go with?

It's a stretch, but I've played that scenerio over in mind.