Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-18-2012, 10:47 PM   #46
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinster View Post
Wow, I don't think i watched royster in the season. His two runs in this video against the eagles are disgusting. I hope he is actually good and it wasn't just because it was a meaningless game against the worst tackling secondary in the league.
He also tore up the Vikings.

He's legit.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-19-2012, 10:42 AM   #47
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

i like tim if i had to go with one but what i really like is just picking athletic relatively cheap players to plug in .. burst of speed, one cut guys who can hang onto the balll .. i feel like tim gets the edge b/c he can catch out of the backfield and did well enough picking up blitzers on pass plays .. helu and royster could very well do that to just havent had as much of a chance to show it.

but i love the by committee approach and the production. tim went down, no prob we didnt miss a beat.
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 01:19 PM   #48
Mechanix544
The Starter
 
Mechanix544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Helu. Period. Young burner who can take a hit, vision will only get better. He did that good his ROOKIE season, and has a solid work ethic. Helu FTW.
Mechanix544 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 11:14 PM   #49
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,009
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Looking back on it, Helu could have rushed for over 1,000 yards had he been inserted into the lineup earlier in the season. It took Hightower to go down with a season ending injury for Helu to get a bulk load of the carries. But based on Royster's yard per carry average last season, I'd say he's the best of the three Redskin running backs.
REDSKINS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2012, 09:23 AM   #50
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Here's how I rate the backs on each skillset:
Rated on a point scale (3-1) where 3 is the highest

Helu......Hightower..........Royster
3................2....................1.......Size
3................2....................1.......Spee d
2................1....................3.......Quic kness
3................2....................1.......Toug hness
2................1....................3.......Late ral Agility
2................1....................3.......Cutb ack ability
3................3....................3........Vis ion
3................2..................1(?)......Catc hing
2................3..................1(?)......Pass Pro
3................2..................1(?)......Rout e Running
2................1....................?........Dur ability
3................2....................1.......Powe r(break tackles/run through contact)
2................1....................3.......Juke (make people miss in space)
2................3.....................1.......Lea dership/Locker room
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2012, 03:59 PM   #51
TexSkins
Camp Scrub
 
TexSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pipe Creek, Texas
Posts: 72
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Here's how I rate the backs on each skillset:
Rated on a point scale (3-1) where 3 is the highest

Helu......Hightower..........Royster
3................2....................1.......Size
3................2....................1.......Spee d
2................1....................3.......Quic kness
3................2....................1.......Toug hness
2................1....................3.......Late ral Agility
2................1....................3.......Cutb ack ability
3................3....................3........Vis ion
3................2..................1(?)......Catc hing
2................3..................1(?)......Pass Pro
3................2..................1(?)......Rout e Running
2................1....................?........Dur ability
3................2....................1.......Powe r(break tackles/run through contact)
2................1....................3.......Juke (make people miss in space)
2................3.....................1.......Lea dership/Locker room
I'm not sure if you mixed the names or ratings on this but some of this doesn't make sense. Size - they're all similar in height and weight. Royster is the tallest and Hightower weighs the most so Helu doesn't deserve a 3. Hightower should be more powerful than Helu.
TexSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2012, 08:01 PM   #52
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexSkins View Post
I'm not sure if you mixed the names or ratings on this but some of this doesn't make sense. Size - they're all similar in height and weight. Royster is the tallest and Hightower weighs the most so Helu doesn't deserve a 3.
The rankings are simply a categorized numerical breakdown of my opinion.
I wouldn't and don't expect universal or even small scale agreement.
I'm sure if you were to use the same format (and I would love to see it if you wanted to post it)
to rate the backs it would be different from mine.
But, that difference wouldn't compel me to state that your rankings 'don't make sense' or 'player doesn't deserve rating X' or 'player X should have ranking X'

But to answer your questions:
Sure the backs are similar in height and weight but they're not the same.
Each person, I'm sure has their own view of ideal size for a RB.
And for me its a mix of their height/weight and their actual size in pads.
Helu is an inch shorter but only 3 pounds lighter then THT imo this makes him more compact and I think its apparent in how they look in pads.

Helu is 5-11/219
Hightower is 6'/222
Royster is 6'1/213

Quote:
Hightower should be more powerful than Helu
Maybe Hightower should be more powerful in your view.
But to my eye no RB on the team runs through contact better then Helu.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2012, 08:39 PM   #53
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Stumbled onto more highlights:

Cardinals vs Redskins 2011 :: RoyHelusRuns.mp4 video by Txredskins44 - Photobucket
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2012, 11:56 PM   #54
Bucket
Playmaker
 
Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,881
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Helu without a doubt should be our #1. Now that we have a mobile weapon at QB.. Our Offense will pack so much speed.

He runs the Zone the best of the 3 IMO.. His hands out of the Backfield is also a nice addition to a already quick threat.
__________________
I need something to cheer about
Redskin Fan since '88
Be friends on Twitter! @thecasualhero
Bucket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 12:21 AM   #55
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 44
Posts: 10,069
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Helu, he has vision and speed which is deadly. Tim was avg at best with his measly ypc. Royster is still on the team?
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 08:27 AM   #56
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

If we're talking YPC Royster was the highest of the bunch.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 10:00 AM   #57
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,528
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

I envision Helu as a poor mans Ray Rice. I really hope he catches on.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 10:13 AM   #58
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Probably already said since were beyond 3 pages....

I've always thought:

Hightower- best all around. but can take it to the edge to spread defenses.
Helu- quick and elusive, shifty. finds holes and can make people miss tackles.
Royster- a between the tackle monster. can run over people. always + yrds.

But they picked up a new guy whom I think they are shifting to FB which I think will be more interesting. I think he will either be a decent blocker or punisher up the middle.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 10:13 AM   #59
CrustyRedskin
Playmaker
 
CrustyRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,057
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Ranked 16th in total yards but 26th in scoring. This must improve.
__________________
Lafayette, we're here.

HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14.
CrustyRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 10:31 AM   #60
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrustyRedskin View Post
Ranked 16th in total yards but 26th in scoring. This must improve.
Hopefully our problems will be somewhat solved with RG3. I think defenses stacked the box knowing RG1 couldn't throw very far or accurate. Teams will challenge RG3 and hopefully get burned enough to decide putting more CB's in the back field will be better opening up more running lanes for our RB's.

Then there is the hope the OL knows it's assignments better and performs better.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.15545 seconds with 10 queries