Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Niles Paul... Tight End?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2012, 03:42 PM   #46
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

Chris Cooley has to show he's healthy during minicamps or he's likely gone
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-10-2012, 04:08 PM   #47
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Chris Cooley has to show he's healthy during minicamps or he's likely gone
Cooley has been one of my favs, but I think the above is fair.

Moss is a different story IMHO. He's the only proven WR on the roster in this system and Mike would be an absolute fool to put his eggs in the Garcon, Hankerson, Morgan basket. Hankerson had one solid game as a pro, coming off serious injury. Garcon and Morgan are brand new to the system. Morgan an injury risk and Garcon historically inconsistent.

...I think Mike has already been a little silly to name these three guys as potential starters while leaving Moss out. Sometimes he looks/acts like young, inexperienced coach.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 04:58 PM   #48
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 54
Posts: 3,803
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

Could also be based on the Cap Hit, Cooley's due alot of $$$ this year if we release or he dosen't want to redo his contract and we let him go we might need someone to step in. We have to remember we have a limited amount of spots on this team the more things you can do the better your chances.
NYCskinfan82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 05:33 PM   #49
VegasSkinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
VegasSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82 View Post
Could also be based on the Cap Hit, Cooley's due alot of $$$ this year if we release or he dosen't want to redo his contract and we let him go we might need someone to step in. We have to remember we have a limited amount of spots on this team the more things you can do the better your chances.
I could see cooly signing with the giants. That would break my heart
VegasSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 12:16 PM   #50
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

I totally forgot about them using Cooley at FB. Now that Sellers is gone, he could see more action there, provided he is healthy. Not saying he's gonna get a lot of reps, but they need a backup FB.

Who else at present is a backup to Young?
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 01:19 PM   #51
Monksdown
The Starter
 
Monksdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 1,515
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
I totally forgot about them using Cooley at FB. Now that Sellers is gone, he could see more action there, provided he is healthy. Not saying he's gonna get a lot of reps, but they need a backup FB.

Who else at present is a backup to Young?
The rookie rb we drafted i thought.
Monksdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 03:47 PM   #52
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,369
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post

Who else at present is a backup to Young?
Owen "Schmitty" Schmitt.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 04:01 PM   #53
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

Has he signed?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 04:02 PM   #54
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

Not with us. Not yet at least.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 05:11 PM   #55
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,369
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeydad View Post
Not with us. Not yet at least.
Oh. I thought he did? Apparently not.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 05:13 PM   #56
los panda
Pro Bowl
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

if young or morris can't get the job done at fb, i'd rather have sellers back than bleeding forehead signed
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81
los panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 06:57 PM   #57
Gary84Clark
Registered User
 
Gary84Clark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,035
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Cooley has been one of my favs, but I think the above is fair.

Moss is a different story IMHO. He's the only proven WR on the roster in this system and Mike would be an absolute fool to put his eggs in the Garcon, Hankerson, Morgan basket. Hankerson had one solid game as a pro, coming off serious injury. Garcon and Morgan are brand new to the system. Morgan an injury risk and Garcon historically inconsistent.

...I think Mike has already been a little silly to name these three guys as potential starters while leaving Moss out. Sometimes he looks/acts like young, inexperienced coach.
During open competition Moss is gonna win.
Gary84Clark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 08:22 PM   #58
Skins4L
Impact Rookie
 
Skins4L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 886
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

i really like our TE situation. Freds the obvious guy to start the year. Cooley as a heavy spell, packages with them both on the field. The fact that Shanahan has confidence in Niles Paul is nice to see in case something doesnt work out. I dont like the idea of him being moved just to get rid of Cooley.. Cooley has a few years left if he can stay on the field... cause you dont lose your HANDS with time... hes always had great hands he still will its the YAC im worried about. Because hes smart hell get open.
__________________
ALL HAIL
Skins4L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 08:26 PM   #59
Skins4L
Impact Rookie
 
Skins4L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 886
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary84Clark View Post
During open competition Moss is gonna win.
Moss is dirty, always get a little YAC hes still explosive at his age. Every now and then youll see him miss something i would have like to seen him caught. But Moss is CLUTCH. RG3 will give him a spark where Santana might have actually declined more this year without him. well see..
__________________
ALL HAIL
Skins4L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012, 03:04 PM   #60
warriorzpath
Registered User
 
warriorzpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
Re: Niles Paul... Tight End?

The Niles Paul and Lorenzo Alexander experiments say a few things to me with Mike Shanahan and the Redskins.

1) The Redskins are deficient with blocking at the TE position.
2) He values Special Teams play and rewards the ST standout players (and the team) by trying to find playing time for them on the offensive and defensive units. Effort and working hard = Special Teams performance
3) Paul and Alexander appear to be guaranteed to be on the 53 player roster as long as they continue to put at least the same amount of effort.
I'd be shocked if Paul is not on the roster for the first regular season game.
4) All roads and decisions lead to RGIII -- especially this early in the offseason. These experiments say more to me with their adjustments and the things they are planning with Griffin III, more than anything Shanahan has said in the media (which is a bit surprising in itself, since he usually doesn't reveal much).
5) If these experiments don't work out -- I wouldn't be surprised if they traded for or signed a TE, whose strength is blocking.

To expand a little more with #4 and #5 -- I think Mike Shanahan is genuinely excited with all the different things that he is envisioning with RGIII. And in order to do that, he needs to have at least one good blocking TE. With a good blocking Tight End and RGIII, I think Shanahan will be able to implement what he already has said -- to show the NFL what it's never seen before. I, for one, can see the same thing -- with (advanced) designed boot-legs, roll-outs, stretch-running plays designed for RGIII headed toward the sidelines.

What's the cornerback going to do with these plays headed right for him? Play the wideout or play RGIII, who is sprinting full 4.41 speed designed to beat him and gain at least 10 "easy" yards?

This is the reason why I'm hoping and I think that the Redskins are hoping that 6th-round draft pick Alfred Morris shows the NFL potential that he showed in college. That strong, bruising style will complement the speed of RGIII and the one-cut style running backs already on the roster.

As of Cooley, I think that he isn't in danger of being cut unless he is not healthy -- because they will need him to contribute in the passing game, and as the main backup to the starting "receiving" TE, Fred Davis.
warriorzpath is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.13241 seconds with 10 queries