12-15-2005, 09:07 AM | #31 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: "Donovan McNabb: Mediocre at Best" Article
The mcnabb & vick style of QB is not the style of QB (run & athletic) that wins super bowls. I'd mauch rather have Tom Brady, P. Manning style (pro style pocket QB). That way of playing the position works best in the pro game.
Is Mcnabb average, I think he's better than that but not the great player the media makes him out to be. |
Advertisements |
12-15-2005, 09:33 AM | #32 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,570
|
Re: "Donovan McNabb: Mediocre at Best" Article
I'd love to suffer through having a mediocre talent like McNabb.
|
12-15-2005, 09:40 AM | #33 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 41
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: "Donovan McNabb: Mediocre at Best" Article
Quote:
To answer your question as to why the Eagles drafted Owens if McNabb was so good, has it occured to you that, generally speaking, it's nice for a QB to have a target to throw to? Or do you think that good QBs just throw to large empty spaces downfield and they magically turn into touchdowns? Where would Steve Young and Joe Montana have been without Jerry Rice? Where would Peyton Manning be without Marvin Harrison? Look what happened to Daunte Culpepper after Randy Moss left. Hell, look at Brunell before Santana Moss. I sort of can't believe I just typed all this in response to such an asinine post. |
|
12-15-2005, 09:47 AM | #34 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 41
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: "Donovan McNabb: Mediocre at Best" Article
Quote:
I'm not arguing that McNabb is the greatest QB ever - far from it. I do think he's a Top 5 QB and more than capable of winning a championship. |
|
12-15-2005, 09:55 AM | #35 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 41
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: "Donovan McNabb: Mediocre at Best" Article
Quote:
There's plenty of genuinely overrated players in the league - why the hell does everyone focus in on McNabb, who has more legitimacy and stats to back it up than anyone? |
|
12-15-2005, 10:20 AM | #36 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: "Donovan McNabb: Mediocre at Best" Article
Quote:
Sure he's capable of winning a championship but I'll believe that QBing style can win one when it happens. |
|
12-15-2005, 10:28 AM | #37 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,570
|
Re: "Donovan McNabb: Mediocre at Best" Article
McNabb and Vick aren't even in the same class of QB anymore.
McNabb has transformed himself into a pocket passer while Vick is still working on that part of his game. McNabb no longer relies on scrambling like he did earlier in his career. The numbers back that up. |
12-15-2005, 10:34 AM | #38 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: "Donovan McNabb: Mediocre at Best" Article
Quote:
|
|
12-15-2005, 10:47 AM | #39 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: "Donovan McNabb: Mediocre at Best" Article
Quote:
I agree that McNabb is much more of a passer now than he used to be but he's not in the same passing category as Brady or P. Manning. McNabb is light years beyond Vick (who I believe is the most over-rated player in the NFL). |
|
12-15-2005, 11:08 AM | #40 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: "Donovan McNabb: Mediocre at Best" Article
Quote:
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........ |
|
|
|