Redskins Add WRs Pierre Garcon and Joshua Morgan

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Are we still "in talks" with Royal or is it take it or leave it at this point?

We are in that wait and see mode from what I'm reading between the lines.

Royal wants to be a skin but more money and a different opportunity is coming his way from "San Diego which means a whales vagina"

[Brody81]

Originally Posted by 30gut

Why would they cut Moss or Gaffney?
I know Moss contract isn't expensive and iirc Gaffney's isn't either.

They're both proven, productive WRs (more productive then the WRs we brought in) and they know this offense.
That knowledge is going to crucial to help the new WRs and beneficial for our rookie QB.


The quality and depth the new WRs add would be lost if Moss and Gaffney aren't retained.

I can't wait to watch training camp and read the reports about how good Moss and Gaffney look and hear about how the new WRs are pulling on their shorts to learn and gain insight into the offense.

They should cut Moss not Gaffney.. I'm tired of his drops in big situations.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

We are in that wait and see mode from what I'm reading between the lines.

Royal wants to be a skin but more money and a different opportunity is coming his way from "San Diego which means a whales vagina"

What does a whale's vagina have to do with this?

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Mechanix544

I think San Diego is going to get him. I saw something on Google sports earlier that said the Titans could be looking at Royal as well.

I think we end up with him. had his best season under Shanny and probably would be beyond buried on the depth chart in SD.

Floyd/Meachem/Brown/Royal

Garcon/Hank/Morgan/Royal

Better fit here in my opinion.

[12thMan]

Now that VJAX is gone, San Diego could feature Royal more, plus he's used to playing in the division. Norv, Rivers, Gates, etc.

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

What does a whale's vagina have to do with this?

Whatever the meaning, please don't Youtube it......and lookout for the Pic to share thread...
DRave has gone Native over there.

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

What does a whale's vagina have to do with this?

You've never seen anchorman?

[DynamiteRave]

Originally Posted by Hog1

Whatever the meaning, please don't Youtube it......and lookout for the Pic to share thread...
DRave has gone Native over there.

lol I haven't posted pics in awhile. I think I'm overdue.

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by 12thMan

Now that VJAX is gone, San Diego could feature Royal more, plus he's used to playing in the division. Norv, Rivers, Gates, etc.

exactly and its san diego not washington dc; better weather

[vallin21]

Ted Ginn Jr?... If Royal doesn't sign

Royal 2011: 19 rec 155 yds 1 td 8.6 ypc
Ginn 2011: 19 rec 220 yds 11.6 ypc

Royal and Ginn Jr had the same amount of receptions; but Ginn was able to gain close to 12 yds per catch, and was also a better Punt Returner:
(38 Returns, 466 yds, 12.3 average, 1 TD, 9 20+ yrd returns, and 3 returns over 40 yds.) Compared to Royal's (12 Ret, 194 yds, 16.2, 1TD, only 20+ yrd returns and just 1 return over 40.)

2011 KR's

Ginn: 29 Ret, 800 yds, 27.6 avg, 102T, 1 TD

Royal : 3 Returns, 47 yds, 15.7 avg, longest return just 20 yds, 0 TD's


Conclusion: Though Shanahan may like Royal because he was a Shanahan pick, Royal is inconsistent, and not the "best" "return, slot specialist" people are making him out to be. Compared to Royal, Ginn has been statistically better in almost every WR and return category, and what stood out about Ginn was his KR avg of 27.5 yds in 2011, where kicks moved up 5 yds, equating to more touchbacks. If we should sign another WR, it should be Ginn not Royal.

[Hog1]

I saw that....Jonesin a bit are ya'?

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by vallin21

Ted Ginn Jr?... If Royal doesn't sign

Royal 2011: 19 rec 155 yds 1 td 8.6 ypc
Ginn 2011: 19 rec 220 yds 11.6 ypc

Royal and Ginn Jr had the same amount of receptions; but Ginn was able to gain close to 12 yds per catch, and was also a better Punt Returner:
(38 Returns, 466 yds, 12.3 average, 1 TD, 9 20+ yrd returns, and 3 returns over 40 yds.) Compared to Royal's (12 Ret, 194 yds, 16.2, 1TD, only 20+ yrd returns and just 1 return over 40.)

2011 KR's

Ginn: 29 Ret, 800 yds, 27.6 avg, 102T, 1 TD

Royal : 3 Returns, 47 yds, 15.7 avg, longest return just 20 yds, 0 TD's


Conclusion: Though Shanahan may like Royal because he was a Shanahan pick, Royal is inconsistent, and not the "best" "return, slot specialist" people are making him out to be. Compared to Royal, Ginn has been statistically better in almost every WR and return category, and what stood out about Ginn was his KR avg of 27.5 yds in 2011, where kicks moved up 5 yds, equating to more touchbacks. If we should sign another WR, it should be Ginn not Royal.

Fact is royal still had 91 catches for 980 yards as a rookie for Shanny. ginn has ever come close to that

[44Deezel]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Fact is royal still had 91 catches for 980 yards as a rookie for Shanny. ginn has ever come close to that

Isn't Cutler openly campaigning for Royal?

[44Deezel]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Same can be said for any reciever that Peyton Manning threw to.

Precisely. And Steelers turned over WRs and won a second.

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by 44Deezel

Isn't Cutler openly campaigning for Royal?

Yes but he'd be competing with Hester, Knox, Bennet, Sanzanbacher, Roy Williams (he'll be cut), and of course BMarshall