The Too Soon 2021 NFL Draft Thread

[Brummie Brave]

First ever attempt on the PFN simulator, I'd be happy with this...

19. Mac Jones QB Alabama

51. Alex Leatherwood OT Alabama

74. Chaz Surratt LB North Carolina

82. Hunter Long TE Boston

124. Keith Taylor CB Washington

164. Damonte Coxie WR Memphis

243. Jamar Johnson S Indiana

245. Tommy Kraemer OG Notre Dame

[AnonEmouse]

My first too (hello fellow Brummie! ):

19. Kyle Pitts TE Florida
63. Amon-Ra St. Brown WR USC (trade)
74. Eric Stokes CB Georgia
87. Jackson Carman OT Clemson (trade)
98. Demetric Felton WR UCLA (trade)
124. Kellen Mond QB Texas A&M
136. Aaron Banks OG Notre Dame (trade)
243. K.J. Britt LB Auburn

Trade returns:
2022 NO 4th
2022 PIT 5th

I went for BPA/value, beefing WR OL and CB. Maybe better value in a higher LB pick but Britt could be good value. I like Mond from what little I've seen and he could, like Lance, benefit from a year behind a vet like Allen or even Heinicke.

[sdskinsfan2001]

19: R1 P19 LB Zaven Collins - Tulsa
51: R2 P19 S Richie Grant - UCF
74: R3 P10 OT Brady Christensen - BYU
82: R3 P18 TE Hunter Long - Boston College
124: R4 P19 LB Jabril Cox - LSU
164: R5 P19 WR Josh Imatorbhebhe - Illinois
243: R7 P17 CB Camryn Bynum - California
245: R7 P19 G Nolan Laufenberg - Air Force

[Brummie Brave]

Originally Posted by AnonEmouse

My first too (hello fellow Brummie! ):

19. Kyle Pitts TE Florida
63. Amon-Ra St. Brown WR USC (trade)
74. Eric Stokes CB Georgia
87. Jackson Carman OT Clemson (trade)
98. Demetric Felton WR UCLA (trade)
124. Kellen Mond QB Texas A&M
136. Aaron Banks OG Notre Dame (trade)
243. K.J. Britt LB Auburn

Trade returns:
2022 NO 4th
2022 PIT 5th

I went for BPA/value, beefing WR OL and CB. Maybe better value in a higher LB pick but Britt could be good value. I like Mond from what little I've seen and he could, like Lance, benefit from a year behind a vet like Allen or even Heinicke.

Hello again. I haven't posted for a while but often find time for a read through and always enjoy reading your posts, very balanced.

[AnonEmouse]

Originally Posted by Brummie Brave

Hello again. I haven't posted for a while but often find time for a read through and always enjoy reading your posts, very balanced.

[sdskinsfan2001]

PFN mock draft simulator is crazy with trades. I got all these picks and picks for next year on just accepting certain trades. I didn't actually propose any. No way trade offers are this common but it was a fun exercise.

32. Zaven Collins LB Tulsa
95. Elijah Moore WR Mississippi
97. James Hudson OT Cincinnati
98. Kelvin Joseph CB Kentucky
101. Kyle Trask QB Florida
124. Ben Cleveland OG Georgia
127. James Wiggins S Cincinnati
135. Monty Rice LB Georgia
140. Rodarius Williams CB Oklahoma State
142. Frank Darby WR Arizona State
153. Quintin Morris TE Bowling Green
174. Damar Hamlin S Pitt
178. Josh Palmer WR Tennessee
243. Tommy Kraemer OG Notre Dame
245. Jamar Johnson S Indiana
2022 TB 3rd
2022 DEN 3rd
2022 IND 3rd
2022 NO 3rd
2022 TB 4th
2022 IND 5th
2022 NO 5th
2022 TEN 5th
2022 DAL 6th

[Scalper]

My PFN, no trades, I'd let Scherff walk, one of Ts on roster backs up G or starts at G. Our Ts wolud then be Lucas, Moses, Charles, Leatherwood, Little, one moves to or swings G this year, next year Lucas is FA and Moses can be cut no cap cost, both older than 30 gone, we have Leatherwood, Little, Charles, draft one more T 3rd to 7th round, maybe a G, OL solved. Open competition this year at T both spots. This gets us 2 QBs, cut Allen, 3rd Heinecke, long term solutions at LT and RT, which with C locked up solidifies OL for 4 years. We have developmental QBs, 3 of them, and the Ts to protect them on the edges. Added a decent RB which we could use behind Gibson, cut non-producers or guys with no burst like Love. Added a big athletic WR with true speed, a big corner, and a TE. Hit every high leverage position, but did not address the one gaping hole in D at FS, nor the needs at LB. Getting a QB and protecting him more important, next year finish shoring up D with stopgaps in FA similar to this year, low cost players smart deals.

19.

Mac Jones
QB Alabama
WAS
51.

Alex Leatherwood
OT Alabama
WAS
74.

Javonte Williams
RB North Carolina
WAS
82.

Walker Little
OT Stanford
WAS
124.

Nico Collins
WR Michigan
WAS
164.

Benjamin St-Juste
CB Minnesota
WAS
243.

Peyton Ramsey
QB Northwestern
WAS
245.

John Bates
TE Boise State

[Chief X_Phackter]

Rashod Bateman:

6' 2"
210 lbs
4.39 40 time

Opposite of McLaurin, that would be sick...

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

19: R1 P19 LB Zaven Collins - Tulsa
51: R2 P19 S Richie Grant - UCF
74: R3 P10 OT Brady Christensen - BYU
82: R3 P18 TE Hunter Long - Boston College
124: R4 P19 LB Jabril Cox - LSU
164: R5 P19 WR Josh Imatorbhebhe - Illinois
243: R7 P17 CB Camryn Bynum - California
245: R7 P19 G Nolan Laufenberg - Air Force

I love this draft! Tons of talent in positions of need.

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by Brummie Brave

First ever attempt on the PFN simulator, I'd be happy with this...

19. Mac Jones QB Alabama

51. Alex Leatherwood OT Alabama

74. Chaz Surratt LB North Carolina

82. Hunter Long TE Boston

124. Keith Taylor CB Washington

164. Damonte Coxie WR Memphis

243. Jamar Johnson S Indiana

245. Tommy Kraemer OG Notre Dame

Me too. Good job!

[skinsfaninok]

19. Derrisaw - LT
51. Tylan Wallace -WR
74. Davis Mills - QB
82. Brevin Jordan - TE
124. K . Green - G
163. A . Ogundeii - LB
243. D.J Daniel - CB
245 . Josh Ball - T

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter

Rashod Bateman:

6' 2"
210 lbs
4.39 40 time

Opposite of McLaurin, that would be sick...

Usually don't like taking WRs in the first but I'd take him at 19

[Ohioskins]

Yes, we should let Scherff walk. After all, All Pro Guards are so easy to replace ??????

[SkinzWin]

Originally Posted by Ohioskins

Yes, we should let Scherff walk. After all, All Pro Guards are so easy to replace ??????

Maybe not, but covering up a weak guard is easier to do than other position groups. I would argue it would be better to have a mid tier guard on a low cost salary and put that money into a different position group than it would be to pay $18 mil + per year for a guard and suffer with your talent level at other position groups.

[MissouriSkin]

Originally Posted by SkinzWin

Maybe not, but covering up a weak guard is easier to do than other position groups. I would argue it would be better to have a mid tier guard on a low cost salary and put that money into a different position group than it would be to pay $18 mil + per year for a guard and suffer with your talent level at other position groups.

Rewatch the Ram game with Martin vs Donald and get back to us.