Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


We've got big trouble on the OL.

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-11-2012, 08:27 PM   #436
RGIII
Registered User
 
RGIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

This OL isn't built for the power running game. That's ok.
RGIII is offline  

Advertisements
Old 08-11-2012, 09:38 PM   #437
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Same ole same ole. If this season is subpar, Shanny can blame the O line. Shoot you can blame the oline all you want. This situation should have been rectified with Gibbs and Zorn. Never trade anymore picks for any questionable veteran with health issues, especially o linemen. Every draft should have at least 3 o linemen in it so you might get some new starters or at least some young depth at that position.
GusFrerotte is offline  
Old 08-11-2012, 09:42 PM   #438
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

That being said, it will be a good season for us. I am not going to predict a record, but whatever happens the future will look bright. Next draft better see a bunch of o linemen selected.
GusFrerotte is offline  
Old 08-11-2012, 09:57 PM   #439
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Still too early to say. I like what I saw pass blocking... not so much in the run game though.
I like the game plan for the run game with the starters. They realize the strength in the left side so they test the right all night and got them in a rhythm by the end of te TD drive. I honestly thought this was a well excited plan by the coaches.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 08-11-2012, 10:11 PM   #440
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 36,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
That being said, it will be a good season for us. I am not going to predict a record, but whatever happens the future will look bright. Next draft better see a bunch of o linemen selected.
Honestly I'd say 8-8 would be a really good start for griff
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 12:10 AM   #441
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
Honestly I'd say 8-8 would be a really good start for griff
That's what I'm thinking. But I'm dreaming 10-6.
NYCskinfan82 is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 12:30 AM   #442
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RGIII View Post
This OL isn't built for the power running game. That's ok.
Um okay? We don't run power.
We run zone blocking scheme with an emphasis on stretch outside zone which they struggled to execute.
30gut is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 02:11 AM   #443
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
Honestly I'd say 8-8 would be a really good start for griff
I know Okie, but every year for the last shoot since Norv's final year I go to the old tried and true 8-8 to 10-6 routine and it usually doesn't work out that way, so I don't want to sound like a broken record all the time. Our schedule is brutal in November, but rather tame in my opinion in Sept and into October. Intradivisional games of course are always tough, but the beginning of the schedule maybe can be a tuning up period for Robert.
GusFrerotte is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 01:55 PM   #444
HailGreen28
Playmaker
 
HailGreen28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Um okay? We don't run power.
We run zone blocking scheme with an emphasis on stretch outside zone which they struggled to execute.
And it always takes a while for a line to get good. Especially at ZBS. I'm not that upbeat on our OL after the Buffalo game. I think if we start the regular season now, opposing defenses keep pounding our line like Buffalo did the first two series.

Love how Griffin played, though. The kid looks more and more the real deal we're been hoping for. 'Course Rex and Beck looked good in preseason last year too. But RGIII played much better Thursday than they had last season.

Looking forward to seeing them open up the offense, as they move forward. Running more rollouts and options like they have in practice. As long as they don't expose Griffin too much. I'm really worried an uncovered DE is going to take him out.
HailGreen28 is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 06:27 PM   #445
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HailGreen28 View Post
And it always takes a while for a line to get good. Especially at ZBS. I'm not that upbeat on our OL after the Buffalo game. I think if we start the regular season now, opposing defenses keep pounding our line like Buffalo did the first two series.
I think regular they can scheme to make the OL more productive.
I think for the purposes of evaluation there was an emphasis on one-v-one blocking at the point and getting to the second level.
I think in a regular season game they can put greater emphasis on combination/double team blocks to drive the DL off the line then peel to get to the second level.

Also, I think there will/should be much more diversity to the run game then outside stretch zone right.


Quote:
Love how Griffin played, though. The kid looks more and more the real deal we're been hoping for. 'Course Rex and Beck looked good in preseason last year too. But RGIII played much better Thursday than they had last season.
I don't agree but I get your point.
Griffin certainly looked poised.
But he was very well managed with the playcalling and had clearly defined reads as result was playing simple pitch and catch.
Griffin also didn't face many blitz looks nor did he throw a high volume of passes.
But, yes I like the way Griffin looked, just would have liked to see him get more work.

Quote:
Looking forward to seeing them open up the offense, as they move forward. Running more rollouts and options like they have in practice. As long as they don't expose Griffin too much. I'm really worried an uncovered DE is going to take him out.
I'm worried about that too, not so much the roll-outs but the zone-read stuff.
At some point in preseason you would think they have to test their new concepts against a live defense.
30gut is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 07:13 PM   #446
RGIII
Registered User
 
RGIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07 View Post
I like the game plan for the run game with the starters. They realize the strength in the left side so they test the right all night and got them in a rhythm by the end of te TD drive. I honestly thought this was a well excited plan by the coaches.
Defintitely.
RGIII is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 07:28 PM   #447
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
I think regular they can scheme to make the OL more productive.
I think for the purposes of evaluation there was an emphasis on one-v-one blocking at the point and getting to the second level.
I think in a regular season game they can put greater emphasis on combination/double team blocks to drive the DL off the line then peel to get to the second level.

Also, I think there will/should be much more diversity to the run game then outside stretch zone right.


I don't agree but I get your point.
Griffin certainly looked poised.
But he was very well managed with the playcalling and had clearly defined reads as result was playing simple pitch and catch.
Griffin also didn't face many blitz looks nor did he throw a high volume of passes.
But, yes I like the way Griffin looked, just would have liked to see him get more work.

I'm worried about that too, not so much the roll-outs but the zone-read stuff.
At some point in preseason you would think they have to test their new concepts against a live defense.
I agree. You can't show all of your plays in preseason but you can't go into New Orleans in week 1 with a bunch of untested stuff, either.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny

Last edited by Lotus; 08-12-2012 at 10:08 PM.
Lotus is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 09:28 PM   #448
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

The backup O-line gave up 10 sacks in the last 6 games and Helu and Royster had 4 or 5 100 yard games. 0h and Rex cement feet was our QB. Why is the O line so maligned again?
__________________
I am a system poster.
44Deezel is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 10:16 PM   #449
RGIII
Registered User
 
RGIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
The backup O-line gave up 10 sacks in the last 6 games and Helu and Royster had 4 or 5 100 yard games. 0h and Rex cement feet was our QB. Why is the O line so maligned again?
I saw that stat. The OL gave up 42 sacks the entire season so, that's a two fold improvement.
RGIII is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 10:24 PM   #450
RGIII
Registered User
 
RGIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Um okay? We don't run power.
We run zone blocking scheme with an emphasis on stretch outside zone which they struggled to execute.
Sorry for not being clear. I was relating this smaller, lighter OL to being less strong, less powerful. That's why guys are getting pushed back by defenders. But that doesn't mean they won't be successful at running the ball as evidenced by by the last six games of the games.
RGIII is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.38765 seconds with 10 queries