![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
All of this bluster for an eventual H-back. Amazing.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Lotus...he's going to be a QB...and a good one at that. It's absurd to think that he isn't going to at least get a shot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
^ Oh, I believe he'll get a shot at QB. Then, in 2-3 years, it will become clear to him and his team that the best way that he can contribute is to switch to H-back.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Who is Tebow better than right now out of the 32 starting QB's in the league?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Probably no one as of today. But that's not the right question to ask right now, since everyone knows he needs a year or two to sit and learn before he can step in and start in this league. The question you ask will be best answered in one-two years.
__________________
Tardy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
I don't follow Oakland, Cleveland, St. Louis, Seattle or Buffalo. I do follow the Skins and i believe if we are going to turn this franchise around soon unless we trade down for more picks we can't use a valuable draft pick on an experiment under our current circumstances.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
The more and more we discuss QB's and the #4 pick. The more I feel like we should just get Okung and have something to talk about next year when Campbell does the same thing for the 3rd year. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,766
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Tebow is not better than any starting NFL QB right now. He doesn't even have the basic fundamentals of footwork down and he's not up to speed with reading NFL defenses.
This Tebow man crush continues to amaze me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
I would rather see Tebow start the next 2 years than have Marc Bulger or Jake Delhomme on my team. I do not think we should draft Tebow, but I'm just saying everyone is forgetting that this guy will be a "decent" NFL quarterback and nothing more. That's why he's out of the first round discussion because in the first round you try to strike the next Peyton Manning |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,766
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
If you plugged him into an NFL game right now, Tebow would simply be overmatched on a variety of levels. There's no way he's better than any starting QB or even backup right now, and he probably won't be until he's sat on a bench for a year or so. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
I don't think that Dez Bryant would be better than ARE right now. Why? because he needs to atleast go through training camp to get his routes down. Man I don't think Russell Okung is better than any LT/RT we have right now.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,766
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
I didn't ask the question, I merely answered it as it was asked. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,383
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
I've never seen someone with so little NFL potential get so much hype. Simply amazing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|