Rumor: Eagles and Rams Finalizing Trade Involving McNabb

MTK · 03-24-2010, 06:30 PM

The rumor has been heating up all day

skinsfaninok · 03-24-2010, 06:33 PM

great news! Screw PHILLY

DBUCHANON101 · 03-24-2010, 06:34 PM

I STILL dont want Bradford. What good is a QB if he cant be protected? He may be the "sexy" pick but a LT would do better in the long run imo. Plus if they did bring in SB what would they do with JC? Grossman was brought in because he knows the O and we all know if they do go with a QB that high chances are he would start day one. JC would be the odd man out imo due to his salary. end rant

SmootSmack · 03-24-2010, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NM Redskin

Make sense so, Spago could take Suh and have his defensive darling.

I think he might take McCoy before Suh

and I still think Okung goes to the Lions

and I could be wrong on both counts

McD5 · 03-24-2010, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

I STILL dont want Bradford. What good is a QB if he cant be protected? He may be the "sexy" pick but a LT would do better in the long run imo. Plus if they did bring in SB what would they do with JC? Grossman was brought in because he knows the O and we all know if they do go with a QB that high chances are he would start day one. JC would be the odd man out imo due to his salary. end rant

Ben won the SB without being protected.

Aaron Rodgers took GB deep with terrible protection.

We have had one of the best LTs in the entire league for ten years now. It hasn't taken us anywhere.

DBUCHANON101 · 03-24-2010, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McD5

Ben won the SB without being protected.

Aaron Rodgers took GB deep with terrible protection.

We have had one of the best LTs in the entire league for ten years now. It hasn't taken us anywhere.

Be had a great D,and Rogers has one of the best wr corps in the league

Ruhskins · 03-24-2010, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McD5

Ben won the SB without being protected.

Aaron Rodgers took GB deep with terrible protection.

We have had one of the best LTs in the entire league for ten years now. It hasn't taken us anywhere.

We also had a terrible front office that made terrible decisions. One of the main reasons we haven't been successful.

Due to our glaring holes in many areas, I think the best course of action would be to trade down if Bradford falls to us. There should be plenty of teams lining up to take him at #4, if Tampa Bay doesn't trade down with someone first.

SkinsfanNTX · 03-24-2010, 06:41 PM

St. Louis has determined that McNabb and one of the DT's is the best way to improve their club. Even though he is in his early 30's, McNabb is better than any QB in the draft and the Rams don't have to pass on Suh or McCoy (likely Suh). No one at #33 is going to be as talented as McNabb and the Eagles want to move onto Kolb and get something in value for Donovan before his performance diminishes. For the Skins, it improves our choices at number four. Everyone wins with this trade.

BleedBurgundy · 03-24-2010, 06:42 PM

Cleveland could still jump us to get to Bradford. Holmgren has publicly said he doesn't care for Clausen...

BringBackJoeT · 03-24-2010, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12thMan

If true this means that the Rams aren't 1000% sold on Bradford's shoulder and they are definitely trying to make a playoff run sooner rather than later.
And the possibility of Bradford falling to us just increased, but it still doesn't mean we'll draft him.

I tend to agree but wonder how soon the Rams think the playoffs are feasible, and whether McNabb will still be the right guy to be the starting QB when they have the right playoff pieces together. At first glance, I'm not seeing the advantage for them. No doubt, they'd be getting a talented QB, but the Rams are a team that I'd peg as one that, if it was inclined to trade a second round pick, would want in exchange an established player that is a little younger than McNabb.

McD5 · 03-24-2010, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Be had a great D,and Rogers has one of the best wr corps in the league

This is true, but the franchise QB is an absolute necessity in this league. If you don't have one, your best hope is for one season of success, and then failure again. Dilfer and Grossman come to mind.

This is a passing league now, and we need a passer. You cannot win consistently without one.

And if we don't get one now, what are we going to have to give up next season to get one? Multiple picks like the Bears did for Cutler?

Dirtbag59 · 03-24-2010, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McD5

Ben won the SB without being protected.

Aaron Rodgers took GB deep with terrible protection.

We have had one of the best LTs in the entire league for ten years now. It hasn't taken us anywhere.

As much as I want to draft a QB, arguing that Rodgers and Ben didn't have protection is not the way to go. They had enough protection to complete seven step drops and throw a lot of deep balls. The fact that they were so effective at running those type of plays left them more exposed to hits on the QB. Jason could barely finish a 3 step drop.

DBUCHANON101 · 03-24-2010, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McD5

This is true, but the franchise QB is an absolute necessity in this league. If you don't have one, your best hope is for one season of success, and then failure again. Dilfer and Grossman come to mind.

This is a passing league now, and we need a passer. You cannot win consistently without one.

And if we don't get one now, what are we going to have to give up next season to get one? Multiple picks like the Bears did for Cutler?

they had great defenses...and you cant pass with the QB on his rearend.. you want to use the number 4 for David Carr part II ?

SmootSmack · 03-24-2010, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedBurgundy

Cleveland could still jump us to get to Bradford. Holmgren has publicly said he doesn't care for Clausen...

Yeah the Browns are definitely the team to watch out for

McD5 · 03-24-2010, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

As much as I want to draft a QB, arguing that Rodgers and Ben didn't have protection is not the way to go. They had enough protection to complete seven step drops and throw a lot of deep balls. The fact that they were so effective at running those type of plays left them more exposed to hits on the QB. Jason could barely finish a 3 step drop.

You can have the best left tackle in the game, and still not do anything. Like us for the last decade.

If you have the best QB in the game, you are going places.

Both are important, but a QB is absolutely critical. Much more important than a left tackle.

And, don't believe that if we draft Bradford, we are giving up on a LT. We can get both.

We still have plenty of other options to get one. Including packaging up players like one of our TEs, Landry, or even JC together to get one.

03-24-2010, 06:30 PM	#31
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,544	Re: Rumor: Eagles and Rams Finalizing Trade Involving McNabb The rumor has been heating up all day __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

03-24-2010, 06:33 PM	#32
skinsfaninok Warpath Hall of Fame Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: UNITED STATES Age: 38 Posts: 36,145	Re: Rumor: Eagles and Rams Finalizing Trade Involving McNabb great news! Screw PHILLY __________________ “Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban

03-24-2010, 06:41 PM	#38
SkinsfanNTX Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: West Texas Posts: 72	Re: Rumor: Eagles and Rams Finalizing Trade Involving McNabb St. Louis has determined that McNabb and one of the DT's is the best way to improve their club. Even though he is in his early 30's, McNabb is better than any QB in the draft and the Rams don't have to pass on Suh or McCoy (likely Suh). No one at #33 is going to be as talented as McNabb and the Eagles want to move onto Kolb and get something in value for Donovan before his performance diminishes. For the Skins, it improves our choices at number four. Everyone wins with this trade.

03-24-2010, 06:42 PM	#39
BleedBurgundy Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 4,471	Re: Rumor: Eagles and Rams Finalizing Trade Involving McNabb Cleveland could still jump us to get to Bradford. Holmgren has publicly said he doesn't care for Clausen... __________________ "All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit." Thomas Paine

03-24-2010, 06:34 PM	#33
DBUCHANON101 The Starter Join Date: May 2009 Location: Louisiana Posts: 1,373	Re: Rumor: Eagles and Rams Finalizing Trade Involving McNabb I STILL dont want Bradford. What good is a QB if he cant be protected? He may be the "sexy" pick but a LT would do better in the long run imo. Plus if they did bring in SB what would they do with JC? Grossman was brought in because he knows the O and we all know if they do go with a QB that high chances are he would start day one. JC would be the odd man out imo due to his salary. end rant __________________ But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on.

Rumor: Eagles and Rams Finalizing Trade Involving McNabb

Locker Room Main Forum