![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Should Brunell start next week? | |||
| Are you crazy, keep Brunell in! |
|
5 | 5.56% |
| Brunell hasn't done much, but enough to remain the starter. |
|
19 | 21.11% |
| Brunell isn't a bad QB, but we'd be better with Ramsey. |
|
30 | 33.33% |
| Are you crazy, it's not even a question...start Ramsey! |
|
36 | 40.00% |
| Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
i dont think the season is done but i do feel its time to make a change at qb
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 157
|
give me ramsey, hassleback, tupa, the waterboy.... anybody BUT brunell. this guy has ripped my heart out one too many times. HE SUCKS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
|
if we're gonna spend the rest of this season hammering out the offense regardless of winning, shouldn't it be with the qb that will be playing next season?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,101
|
Quote:
you're absolutely right illdefined.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
I understand that the QB is the "pilot" of the offense but geez....we're not getting it done on the ground either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
You know I've read a lot of threads about Brunells performance instead of looking at the consistent disgusting performance of Portis. The excuses he has made and his failures has seriously damaged the offense because it has made our offense one dimesional. No running game, no passing game. We need a change at the running back position until Portis understands what he's suppose to be doing.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Quote:
Didn't Ramsey play behind a offensive line and backs that were letting guys crunch him on just about every down last year? Besides, Brunell is the mobile guy Ramsey isn't. So shouldn't Brunell be able to move around AND throw? I've seen him move around, I just haven't seen the throwing on the run part yet. If you can't throw on the run, I'm not sure how invaluable his mobility is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
|
Quote:
i dont know if you were watching tonight, but what little offense we had was mostly Portis. ground AND air. ALSO. you probably didn't notice we used the I FORMATION this game! Cooley lined up as a fullback to lead block, as is best for what Portis does. now Cooley is a catching TE, and is LEARNING to block, period. much less from the fullback position. even LESS against the Ravens defense! so, we didn't get many yards. but he DID take the initial hit off Portis, and we got NO FUMBLES from the previous week's one back system. i dont know how anyone can doubt Portis's ability OR heart. in pass protection, he throws himself into EVERY block (and it WORKS). as a short yardage guy, he throws his tiny body into non-existent holes (which obviously doesnt). one thing Portis can't do is gain 50lbs! nor lead block for himself or make holes for himself!! the offense is broken everywhere, Portis's numbers are a symptom, NOT a cause. now lets get back on topic.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Heres the agrument I have for not getting it done on the ground. We have no blocking, plain and simple. When theres no blocking on the ground, there are no holes and no yardage. Now while some things are still the fault of Portis/Playcalling, I just couldnt see a play where I could be like... WOW Portis sure messed up on that play.
On the other hand, I just found myself getting pissed at Brunell about 30 times tonight. Now while I'm sure half of those werent his fault, he did f**k up alot. Even though the protection sucked, he still had the chances to plant his feet and get rid of the football... but he didnt. I saw so many opprotunities for Brunell, and just didnt see the same for Portis.
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,902
|
Quote:
Everyone wants to blame Portis or Brunell, but think about it this way, they're both struggling in fact the entire offense is struggling. Could it be it all starts up front? Could be. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Patrick Ramsey will not start next week or the week after unless Brunell is injured. I think right now this team has to look closely at the playcalling in situations that are hurry up offenses. Under pressure our offense has crumbled and this has been consistent for the past four weeks.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|