Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Colt getting some time at #2?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2008, 10:32 AM   #31
PennSkinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
PennSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 53
Posts: 752
Re: Colt getting some time at #2?

Can't blame Zorn. Probably wants to see him go up against at least second stringers instead of just fodder. I don't think this means anything toward actual depth chart..
__________________
DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net

PennSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-08-2008, 10:46 AM   #32
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Colt getting some time at #2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Exactly.

It's hilarious to see people question JC, but on the other hand are so convinced that an unproven rookie is somehow the answer. Simply retarded.
Patrick Ramsey.



It's like the Patrick Ramsey discussions all over again.

Hopefully Colt can do something Ramsey never could...get better with experience.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 07:00 PM   #33
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,356
Re: Colt getting some time at #2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Redskins gave up three picks, including a first-rounder to move up in the draft to get Campbell. Given how much we have valued draft picks this past year, I would say that's a lot of investment to give up on him and turn our offense over to a rookie Qb. We might as well be in rebuilding mode if we do that.
Not to mention we invested 3 picks in the second round this year so Campbell can have more weapons in this offense. We've invested a lot in Campbell, I mean the reason Zorn was first hired was to help Campbell out, so it wouldn't make sense to just give up on him after all that.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 09:34 PM   #34
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: Colt getting some time at #2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Exactly.

It's hilarious to see people question JC, but on the other hand are so convinced that an unproven rookie is somehow the answer. Simply retarded.
I never said Colt was a top eight Qb either..But i did say he'll be one of the future. And not to discount JC's skills i just know more and trust Colt because I've followed him since High School. Both may be a force to reckon with but its amazing how Espn's First Take said the same exact comment today.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 09:54 PM   #35
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
Re: Colt getting some time at #2?

Where's office when you need him?
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.08404 seconds with 9 queries