05-11-2007, 04:43 PM | #31 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
|
|
Advertisements |
05-11-2007, 04:44 PM | #32 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
My concern is with this excerpt from the Wash Post article on 5/9/2007 "Before the voluntary workouts began, Campbell had wanted to work out with wide receivers Antwaan Randle El, Santana Moss and Brandon Lloyd, but the dates never materialized. Moss said he hoped to reschedule with Campbell during the six weeks between the mandatory June minicamp and the start of training camp July 27." Dates never materialized....WTF ! ! Moss, Lloyd & ARE are getting paid a load of jack and they can't schedule a couple weeks together in the off-season to run some routes and throw with their QB. Throwing between Mini-camp and Training Camp is great, but there is NO excuse why Moss, Lloyd, ARE and Cooley weren't all working with Campbell for at least a couple weeks between Feb & now. High School kids aren't getting paid jack and at the High Schools in Virginia Beach most of them are at off-season workouts (unless they are playing another sport) Mon-Thurs from Dec - July. I guess the difference is they have pride in their school and their teammates and doing what it takes to help their school win. To them it is still a game, not a job.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
05-11-2007, 07:57 PM | #33 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
I wanted to point out a couple things:
Has anyone seen the parallel between the running backs on the 'Skins and what JC had at Auburn? I mean, one of the knocks on Campbell coming out of college is that he might have benefited from the RB duo he played with there. Well, now he's got that at the pro level and I think it's a good thing. He knows how to operate and flourish in a two back system. Also, I think JC is the prototype caretaker QB, but in a good way. I think he could excel at doing a lot of things well, taking care of the ball, making some plays with his feet, and distributing the ball and keeping a lot of players interested/happy. Tom Brady is the uber caretaker IMO. I think JC has the potential to really be a distributer/enabler who can put his teammates in position to win games for us. He's not a world beater type, but I think that can play into our hands in a big way if he really does make strides and develop. On a side note, does anyone actually think someone would come out after a couple of offseason workouts and OTA's and say Campbell looks bad, that he has regressed, and that he is really slacking off? I mean, we really do have to wait and see how this plays out on the field. He was coming into the park 12 hours a week and he is the starting quarterback of the wealthiest franchise in a multi billion dollar industry. I am sorry, but I don't say "Wow, he really is working his tail off" when you tell me he's working a 12 hour week. That's barely part time where I come from (Washington, DC). However, I think it is best that he worked with Saunders and got really caught up before throwing on his own with Santana and whoever else. Now, he is really in a position to get everyone on the same page if they do go ahead with that plan to work out together after mini camp. With all that said, I think this could be the year that our offense finally turns the corner. While everyone is so concerned about the D, you have to remember that the defense actually has a pedigree of recent success. The offense has been the enigma that we haven't been able to solve for a long time, and I think it's obvious that JC is the reason this thing will turn around if it does. He doesn't have to be superman, he just needs stay poised, manage the offense, and not be predictable enough to gameplan easily. I think he can do that. |
05-11-2007, 08:37 PM | #34 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 60
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
I do hope I'm wrong, but I agree if he doesn't have a heck of a season he's outta DC. I also think he was very close this year to being chopped, I think it came down to Lloyd or Arch.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
|
05-11-2007, 08:54 PM | #35 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
I agree it was probably a choice of AA or Lloyd. I guess the coaches thought Lloyd was the lesser of the two evils.
|
05-11-2007, 09:11 PM | #36 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 38
Posts: 2,583
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Lloyd is DEF the lesser of 2 evils. Screw AA and B-Lloyd but Llyod is young and can improve. AA is old and screwed. Not a hard decsion IMO. Llyod better step up or , I agree, He's out.
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings |
05-11-2007, 09:16 PM | #37 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
It might be time to change the name of this thread to "Re: Brandon Lloyd's Development".
|
05-11-2007, 09:24 PM | #38 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 38
Posts: 2,583
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
heheeh agreed
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings |
|
05-11-2007, 10:40 PM | #39 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 55
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
Im hoping for big things to happen this year.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
|
05-11-2007, 11:21 PM | #40 |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,165
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
wow man wow
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
05-12-2007, 12:27 AM | #41 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Sounds like JC want to WIN!!!!!!!!!!! Me and a few other posters from the Wash Posts Skins forum were dubbed crazy for wanting to put JC in to begin last season, but if he would have been the starter we would have probably ended up 9-7 and maybe a wildcard. IF this article is on the level, JC is going to be much improved this season and will be hot in '08. One full season in at starter is what he needs. I just hope Llyod can become a viable weapon for JC to throw to and that Randle El improves also. It was too much of the Moss/ Cooley show last season.
|
05-16-2007, 12:48 PM | #42 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
But several guys have said that JC looks much better in his drops and is getting rid of the ball quicker. This is the stuff he most likely works on w/ AS and Lazor during the week. But none of it's going to matter unless he takes in to the field come Sept. I think he will. |
|
05-16-2007, 01:28 PM | #43 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
He will be the best QB in this division no later than next season, and quite possibly this season. If he can outplay McNabb, we have a shot at being a better team than Philadelphia.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
05-16-2007, 01:33 PM | #44 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
Had we started JC from Week 1, he would have most likely been playing great football at the end of the year, but we wouldn't have won games like Jacksonville and Dallas in the first half of the year. Thinking 9-7 with our defense last year is pretty downright insane. He's not Jesus. We probably wouldn't have done a lot worse on the whole starting Campbell the whole year but we would have been really pathetic in the first half of last year, and mentally, we aren't sure how that would affect the future of this team. I'm satisfied with the way our QB situation was handled last year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
05-16-2007, 01:36 PM | #45 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|