Another Reason to Hate Dr. Z/Like Dan Snyder

ArtMonkDrillz · 07-20-2006, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan

This means that Monk's other 40 catches would have had to average 138 yards. It's possible...Did Art Monk play in an era with experimental field dimensions?

I think you need to email that one directly to the dickface himself.

BDBohnzie · 07-20-2006, 12:53 PM

considering that Monk at one point was the all time leader in receptions, and held several NFL Records (which thanks to Jerry Rice and others, were all but obliterated)...he should be in. I mean, Steve Largent's in, and his number are pale now compared to Monk and Rice.

those who can, do. those who can't becomes experts about it.

ArtMonkDrillz · 07-20-2006, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BDBohnzie

considering that Monk at one point was the all time leader in receptions, and held several NFL Records (which thanks to Jerry Rice and others, were all but obliterated)...he should be in. I mean, Steve Largent's in, and his number are pale now compared to Monk and Rice.

those who can, do. those who can't becomes experts about it.

And those who can't become experts become Dr. Z

07-20-2006, 12:53 PM	#32
BDBohnzie Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Frederick, MD Age: 45 Posts: 4,628	Re: Another Reason to Hate Dr. Z/Like Dan Snyder considering that Monk at one point was the all time leader in receptions, and held several NFL Records (which thanks to Jerry Rice and others, were all but obliterated)...he should be in. I mean, Steve Largent's in, and his number are pale now compared to Monk and Rice. those who can, do. those who can't becomes experts about it. __________________ Bad Things man, I mean bad things... “WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris

Another Reason to Hate Dr. Z/Like Dan Snyder

Locker Room Main Forum