|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-23-2006, 08:11 PM | #31 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
T.O. can catch, face it. By the way I just said I would do it, none of what we are saying is actually going to happen. We won't have cap room to sign these types of guys.
|
Advertisements |
01-23-2006, 08:12 PM | #32 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
01-23-2006, 08:20 PM | #33 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
Randle-El is not the answer. I do not understand the buzz about him, either. First of all the reason that Pitts will let him go is because he isn't as good as Cedric Wilson.
Look at his stats: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/player...?playerId=3590 His best year was 43 catches for 600 yards and 3 TDs <crickets chirping>. He isn't even as good as Patten, he fumbles too much, and his hands are Gardneresque. How would he help the team? There are better options out there. |
01-23-2006, 08:34 PM | #34 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 36
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
Quote:
|
|
01-23-2006, 08:40 PM | #35 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
Quote:
|
|
01-23-2006, 08:43 PM | #36 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
Quote:
Lets have a raise of hands on who wants Gardner back.... No one? Oh wait there's one. By a vote of approximately 1900 to 1 that resolution fails. I'll be suiting up for them before 50-50 will again. |
|
01-23-2006, 08:57 PM | #37 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
I would rather have any of these guys then Randle-El:
David Givens NE Josh Reed Buf Antonio Bryant Cle Eric Moulds Buf Kevin Johnson Det Peerless Price Dal Koren Robinson Min David Boston Mia Why are they better options, because almost every one of them has shown that they can produce at the NFL level. Something that Randle-el has never done. Cedric Wilson was the go to guy in the playoff game and had 80 less yards over the course of the season (which was Wilson's first in the system). What makes him better than Patten??? Patten has had two 800 yard seasons and had 7 tds in one year. El has 7 tds in his career (excluding playoffs). What is your evidence except that you "think" he is better. The Redskins need a producer at the #2. Randle-El has bust written all over him. |
01-23-2006, 08:58 PM | #38 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
I would rather have Gardner than Randle-el. At least Gardner can create a mismatch once or twice a season.
|
01-23-2006, 09:31 PM | #39 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 20
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
I agree with Grim21Reeper. I 've never understood all the talk about Randle El being a #2 here. Then Grim shows the stats, The only difference between Patton and Randle El is Patton has 3 rings.
|
01-23-2006, 09:38 PM | #40 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
01-23-2006, 10:20 PM | #41 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 20
|
WR numbers who could be our #2
1. Antonio Bryant = 69rec, 1009yds, 4td's
2.Randle El = 35rec, 558yds, 1td 3.Corey Bradford = 45rec, 697yds, 6tds 4. David Givens = 59rec, 738yds, 2tds 5. Ike Hillard = 35rec, 282yds, 1td 6. K.McCardell = 70rec, 917yds, 9tds 7. J.Jurevicius = 55rec, 694yds, 10tds 8. R.Caldwell = 28rec, 352yds 1td 9. = R.Wayne = 83rec, 1055yds, 5td 10. E.Moulds = 81rec, 816yds, 4tds This isn't the order I want them to be our #2. Except for Moulds I just the UFA players. What about trading Ramsey to the cards for Bryant Johnson. If dallas gets T.O. and cuts K.Johnson, Should we sign him. |
01-23-2006, 10:31 PM | #42 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 36
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
Quote:
As for Randle El I think he is the best choice to fit our style of offense how can you say he hasn't proved that he can play at an NFL level 4 years 162recs, 2,012yds,7tds granted they arent the best numbers but he has proven that he can be a #2 receiver and remember this is his first real year with significant playing time do to Plaxico Burress being in Pittsburgh. Patten is a good receiver but just not a #2 receiver he was always a #3 receiver with New England , I think he fits us better as a #3 and he is getting old, Randle El has only been in the leauge 4 yrs and I think he can do a great job for us. |
|
01-23-2006, 10:38 PM | #43 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,762
|
Re: WR numbers who could be our #2
Quote:
|
|
01-23-2006, 10:49 PM | #44 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I agree on Key. He is garbage. I would like to see the 'boys drop him but I don't want to see T.O. with the star.
|
01-24-2006, 03:47 AM | #45 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I dont want him.......enough with the small ball
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........ |
|
|