Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

celts32 · 01-19-2006, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ParkerGibbs

Well obviously we would want the best QB on the field. The thread is to debate whether you think Campbell will put in the offseason work and be mentally ready for the starting roll (to which I say yes).

Phenomenal point about the Bills though, I can easily see the same scenario playing out in DC, and that would really suck.

Well if Campbell is really ready then anyone who wouldn't play him is crazy. The fact is that most young QB's are not ready when they get on the field and teams squander seasons hoping to get them ready. I think that knowing how Gibbs is a veteran guy he will not put Campbell on the field unless he thinks he is ready to win games. So lets all hope Gibbs can get him ready in time, but if not another year with Brunell would not necessarily be a bad thing.

Big C · 01-19-2006, 09:11 PM

i think we all wish that campbell would be ready to start by this year, but i dont see that happening, so i voted for brunell

onlydarksets · 01-19-2006, 09:14 PM

Matty - what did you mean by "Assuming Campbell is ready to go, who would you like to see starting opening day '06?" If you mean he's learned the system, then it seems like a no-brainer that Campbell starts. However, if you just mean he is physically able to play, well, then it's also a no-brainer (for Brunell).

JManorGC94 · 01-19-2006, 09:24 PM

Brunnel will be the starter until 4 or 5. One good hit and we get to see our future. Im sure Portis is happy to see saunders in DC.

3rd ID SOLDIER · 01-19-2006, 09:45 PM

Campbell might as well get started next season brunell can serve as a mentor to the youngster and besides brunell can always come in if things aren't up to par!

70Chip · 01-19-2006, 09:53 PM

I expect to compete for a Super Bowl next year so unless Campbell is a Marino/Brady clone, (wouldn't that be the shiznit!) you have to go with Brunell.

That Guy · 01-19-2006, 10:10 PM

preseason competition, best man wins... if brunell is hurt he gets benched though. i can't take many more 41 yard passing days.

ST21 · 01-19-2006, 10:24 PM

The Future is Now......Campbell

GoSkins! · 01-19-2006, 10:46 PM

I will trust this coaching staff to make that desicion. There is no question that no other staff can boast the credentials that we possess now.

I think Brunnel will be the guy for one more year.

Longtimefan · 01-19-2006, 11:20 PM

Despite the fact Gibbs told Campbell to take off the cap, it' time to go to work I'm not sure what he means by that. I agree it's not likely he will turn a playoff team over to a QB with so little experience, espically if their ambition is to take the next step in 06. We could expect too many growing pains with Campbell at the helm, so it's a matter of whether we want to sacrifice a season or more grooming a young QB or go with Brunell for all the marbels. It's a dilema that I'm glad the coach has to deal with.
Plus, how much is a new coordinator going to change or tarnish what Jason comprehended this year?

Big C · 01-19-2006, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Longtimefan

Plus, how much is a new coordinator going to change or tarnish what Jason comprehended this year?

i dont think he will tarnish anything. we will keep the same mentality mostly id assume since gibbs is still running the ship, id just assume we would modify some of our offense and add some new plays

j_j__l · 01-20-2006, 02:48 AM

I voted for campbell because it said that if he's "ready to go". I think if Gibbs thinks he's ready then why not start the future now. He couldn't do much worse then 120yrds a game....and With saunders on bord, i think our offense wont need him to throw the ball to JUST Moss...Look what Saunders did with the WR in KC. And now he has Moss?????

bertoskins · 01-20-2006, 03:24 AM

I vote for campbell, the reason is to preserve brunnel body, come play off time campbell might struggle the brunnel is preserve and fresh,

we can win with campbell, just follow steelers, what they did with roethlisberger
after a few weeks of struggle think campbell can raise his game to NFL level

BigSKINBauer · 01-20-2006, 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by j_j__l

I voted for campbell because it said that if he's "ready to go". I think if Gibbs thinks he's ready then why not start the future now. He couldn't do much worse then 120yrds a game....and With saunders on bord, i think our offense wont need him to throw the ball to JUST Moss...Look what Saunders did with the WR in KC. And now he has Moss?????

welcome.

Just so everyone knows i will not be doing any celebrations for two weeks. I decided to have a period of mourning for the skins. so here is a smaller one

skns03 · 01-20-2006, 02:38 PM

i say campbell because he is the future of this franchise i don't care if we have one bad season look at what the giants did with manning next year they won our division I mean lets make a move

View Poll Results: Assuming Campbell is ready to go, who would you like to see starting opening day '06?
Campbell	105	60.34%
Brunell	69	39.66%
Voters: 174. You may not vote on this poll

01-19-2006, 09:11 PM	#32
Big C Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 38 Posts: 4,453	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? i think we all wish that campbell would be ready to start by this year, but i dont see that happening, so i voted for brunell __________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs

01-19-2006, 09:14 PM	#33
onlydarksets Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: all up in your business Posts: 2,693	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? Matty - what did you mean by "Assuming Campbell is ready to go, who would you like to see starting opening day '06?" If you mean he's learned the system, then it seems like a no-brainer that Campbell starts. However, if you just mean he is physically able to play, well, then it's also a no-brainer (for Brunell).

01-19-2006, 09:24 PM	#34
JManorGC94 Camp Scrub Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 67	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? Brunnel will be the starter until 4 or 5. One good hit and we get to see our future. Im sure Portis is happy to see saunders in DC.

01-19-2006, 09:45 PM	#35
3rd ID SOLDIER Special Teams Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 197	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? Campbell might as well get started next season brunell can serve as a mentor to the youngster and besides brunell can always come in if things aren't up to par!

01-19-2006, 09:53 PM	#36
70Chip Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Manassas Age: 53 Posts: 3,048	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? I expect to compete for a Super Bowl next year so unless Campbell is a Marino/Brady clone, (wouldn't that be the shiznit!) you have to go with Brunell. __________________ This Monkey's Gone to Heaven

01-19-2006, 10:10 PM	#37
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,553	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? preseason competition, best man wins... if brunell is hurt he gets benched though. i can't take many more 41 yard passing days.

01-19-2006, 10:24 PM	#38
ST21 Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Texas Posts: 519	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? The Future is Now......Campbell __________________ SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........

01-19-2006, 10:46 PM	#39
GoSkins! The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Yorktown, Va Age: 55 Posts: 1,587	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? I will trust this coaching staff to make that desicion. There is no question that no other staff can boast the credentials that we possess now. I think Brunnel will be the guy for one more year. __________________ Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien

01-19-2006, 11:20 PM	#40
Longtimefan Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Germantown, Md. Posts: 4,832	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? Despite the fact Gibbs told Campbell to take off the cap, it' time to go to work I'm not sure what he means by that. I agree it's not likely he will turn a playoff team over to a QB with so little experience, espically if their ambition is to take the next step in 06. We could expect too many growing pains with Campbell at the helm, so it's a matter of whether we want to sacrifice a season or more grooming a young QB or go with Brunell for all the marbels. It's a dilema that I'm glad the coach has to deal with. Plus, how much is a new coordinator going to change or tarnish what Jason comprehended this year?

01-20-2006, 02:48 AM	#42
j_j__l Camp Scrub Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Italy Age: 47 Posts: 72	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? I voted for campbell because it said that if he's "ready to go". I think if Gibbs thinks he's ready then why not start the future now. He couldn't do much worse then 120yrds a game....and With saunders on bord, i think our offense wont need him to throw the ball to JUST Moss...Look what Saunders did with the WR in KC. And now he has Moss????? __________________ World wide traveling SKINS FAN

01-20-2006, 03:24 AM	#43
bertoskins Special Teams Join Date: May 2004 Location: philippines Age: 51 Posts: 184	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? I vote for campbell, the reason is to preserve brunnel body, come play off time campbell might struggle the brunnel is preserve and fresh, we can win with campbell, just follow steelers, what they did with roethlisberger after a few weeks of struggle think campbell can raise his game to NFL level

01-20-2006, 02:38 PM	#45
skns03 Camp Scrub Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Glen Allen Va Posts: 35	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? i say campbell because he is the future of this franchise i don't care if we have one bad season look at what the giants did with manning next year they won our division I mean lets make a move

Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

Locker Room Main Forum