|
View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Santana Moss for L. Coles deal? | |||
Yes | 43 | 60.56% | |
No | 28 | 39.44% | |
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-25-2005, 11:53 AM | #31 | |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
Quote:
Very, very similar. You're right Matty. Coles is probably alot stronger and slightly quicker. I guess we're going have to get Moss into the weight room, so he can improve his upper body strength. |
|
Advertisements |
02-25-2005, 11:56 AM | #32 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
Quote:
How is Moss a problem? Everybody always wants draft picks, but will a rookie WR be ready to make the same impact as Moss? Very doubtful. I'm just glad we're getting something out of this deal. |
|
02-25-2005, 11:59 AM | #33 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 277
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
Quote:
One thing you can say is that with the new NFL rules or new pattern of rule enforcement on receiver coverage, I think a player like Santana Moss is given even more of an advantage and will thrive. This is a move that I think would be terrific for the Redskins. Moss is a superbly talented player, and I think he will fit in very well here. I like that he is a community contributor as well and has a foundation - that is a good sign about character. So, if all of this goes through - and I know we shouldn't count our chickens before they hatch though - we could have Moss to go with Jacobs, with Thrash there and still draft a receiver at #9 unless the talent level of other players available at other positions is definitely greater. We are lucky that they have such affection for Coles in New York because other teams might not be so willing to risk such a trade with his health concerns. |
|
02-25-2005, 12:00 PM | #34 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 44
Posts: 12,416
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
From Mark Maske's chat running today from 11am to Noon on the WP website. Maske likes a Coles - Moss swap.
Los Angeles, Calif.: CBS Sportsline is reporting that the Skins are trading Coles to the Jets for Santana Moss. Straight up deal, with the Skins eating all of Coles' contract. All things considered, it doesn't seem like a bad deal if it goes through. Mark Maske: When the Redskins drafted Rod Gardner, Dan Snyder wanted Santana Moss but Marty Schottenheimer wanted Gardner. That's one where Snyder was right. If they could get Santana Moss for Laveranues Coles, under the current circumstances, that would be a very good trade for the Redskins, I think. And I think Matty's right in a way, getting something out of this Coles fiasco is better than nothing. And I said this in another thread, they may eat a big cap hit now, but next year looks a lot better than it did before. |
02-25-2005, 12:01 PM | #35 |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
This trade might not make sense to most of you, but we're getting rid of a player WHO DOESN'T WANT TO BE HERE! Thats all that should matter. We're getting a starting WR who is better than any of the receiver we have right now.
|
02-25-2005, 12:03 PM | #36 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Age: 41
Posts: 1,324
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
NO THANKYOU.
Lets continue to build our team the right way thru the draft. |
02-25-2005, 12:05 PM | #37 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 52
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
Quote:
|
|
02-25-2005, 12:10 PM | #38 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
Quote:
I don't think it's a bad move really. I might have held out a bit longer to see if any other better offers came along but time is a factor with that bonus for Coles set to kick in on Monday I believe
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
02-25-2005, 12:15 PM | #39 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 52
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
Quote:
|
|
02-25-2005, 12:19 PM | #40 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
Quote:
With picking up Moss I think this gives us more flexibility with the #9 pick, we could address another need with it like taking a CB, or we could trade down, taking a WR is no longer a must. |
|
02-25-2005, 12:20 PM | #41 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
Quote:
|
|
02-25-2005, 12:20 PM | #42 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 963
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
Moss is supposed to be on ESPN Radio in a few minutes (a replay of an interview that was done earlier today)
http://1050espnradio.com/ |
02-25-2005, 12:30 PM | #43 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 52
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
Quote:
I see what your saying about flexibility in the draft though. I also don't believe the Vikes will use #7 on a WR. I think they need defense. They scored like 30 a game in the weeks Randy Moss was out of the lineup. Also can you imagine the pressure on a WR being taken with the pick that Randy Moss was traded for. Way to much pressure on a rookie. At least if they go defense with #7 it's harder to make a direct comparison of Moss and a defensive player. The Vikes have a late first round pick also that they could take a WR with. Or look at it this way. the Vikes were one of the teams reportedly interested in Coles. if the SKins had traded Coles to the Vikes that would remove the possibility of them taking a WR at #7. |
|
02-25-2005, 12:37 PM | #44 |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
Apparently the Vikings are interested in Mason. So, I think they might be looking for a defensive player at the number 7 pick.
|
02-25-2005, 12:41 PM | #45 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 52
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Moss for Coles?
I will breath a lot easier on draft day if the Vikes add a WR in free agency.
Although i don't like Moss much, if this trade does happen he does bring the speed to get deep and he would make a nice compliment to the big sure handed Mike Williams who I hope they add in April. I just don't like Moss as the main WR but I could see him as a real good #2 with deep speed. |
|
|