06-08-2012, 09:46 AM | #31 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
No way Jose.
Was there ever an issue between Chad and Carson Palmer? Wouldnt the Raiders make the most sense right now?
__________________
|
Advertisements |
06-08-2012, 09:57 AM | #32 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Wide receiver is our strongest unit at the moment. We are going to cut players better than ocho cinco. so no, no me gusto
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
06-08-2012, 10:14 AM | #33 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Don't sit here and dish out logic from your ivory moderator tower! Pssh, you and sense.
__________________
Vacancy |
06-08-2012, 10:19 AM | #34 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
This thread has a suspicious Vinny flavor to it. VC, are you still starting sh-t?
|
06-08-2012, 10:41 AM | #35 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 283
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
No. I'm not a fan of older WRs. While they may be wiser, they are slower. I don't care what other qualities you have or what kind of career you had in the past if you can't separate from defenders now. NO.
|
06-08-2012, 10:42 AM | #36 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
Quote:
In any event CJ/Ocho in his old age might just be camp fodder, might actually be better then the 5th guy we don't know. But if it comes down to him or the 5th guy I want the best man on the field. |
|
06-08-2012, 10:47 AM | #37 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
Quote:
I'm all for the young guys. I'm just saying that if it comes down to a UDFA WR or CJ? I might take CJ or atleast give him a shot. I wouldn't give him a 3 or 4 year contract banking money. It would almost be a T.O. type deal where he gets maybe a one year deal to prove himself just above vet min. That way the team can cut him if he fails to produce or keep him if it turns out he gets our system and thrives a little. |
|
06-08-2012, 10:51 AM | #38 | ||
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
Quote:
Taking a look at Ochocinco’s potential suitors | ProFootballTalk Quote:
|
||
06-08-2012, 10:53 AM | #39 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
Quote:
Why would it come down to an UDFA or Ocho? Our 4th or 5th WR is likely to be guys like Armstrong, Austin, or Robinson. Ocho makes little sense here. |
|
06-08-2012, 10:57 AM | #40 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
Quote:
A hip labral tear isn't anything out of the ordinary. |
|
06-08-2012, 11:51 AM | #41 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
No thank you.
If he DOES come here, Hankerson...do not give up your number. You could be a starter and you'll be making more than him most likely, plus, you had the #85 Redskins jersey first. It was your number in college too, don't give it up for a washed-up scrub WR who can't even learn a new playbook anymore. Make him change his number and pay the consequences of changing his name!
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
06-08-2012, 12:41 PM | #42 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
My biggest concern, like others have said, is whether Ocho would commit to learn the system/playbook. If he's at all serious about extending his career beyond this season learning new tricks will be critical.
The Palmer/Oakland connection probably makes more sense though. WR is likely still a concern for us IMHO. Moss is the only proven vet on the roster who also knows the system/playbook. Hankerson's injury is worrisome especially when he starts to see heavy contact again. Garcon has one solid season behind him and that's only because everyone else was injured. Morgan I just don't get. One of my guys in the office is a forever SanFran fan and didn't think Morgan should ever have started...very pedestrian. Randy Moss is already a big hit though and has the fans all psyched up. He would have been a great addition for Griffin's sake, especially as an ends zone target, which we still don't really have outside Fred Davis. Plus we'd have two Moss' and how cool would that be!
__________________
24-34 Last edited by The Goat; 06-08-2012 at 01:20 PM. |
06-08-2012, 12:47 PM | #43 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,009
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
The Redskins have wide receivers that are all better than Chad Johnson. Would it be wise for Bruce Allen and Mike Shanahan to entertain the thought of acquiring Johnson? If one of our receivers go down with an injury, they will surely look to the practice squad for an addition before even looking Johnson's way.
|
06-08-2012, 12:57 PM | #44 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
06-08-2012, 01:23 PM | #45 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,996
|
Re: Signing Ochocinco: Te gusta?
How does Garcon qualify as a question mark?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|