Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Campbell's numbers dont lie

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2009, 03:01 PM   #361
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
It's easy to sit on the sideline and say this and that? Umm, hello? Dumbass says what? THAT IS ALL WE DO AROUND HERE! And who the hell are you to tell people to support Campbell or shut up. Kiss my ass. Are we all supposed to sit around here and blow smoke up his ass? How gay would that be? He's the QB for a team that hasn't scored 30 points in 19 games, and he's the only guy on Offense that touches the ball on every play. Hell, 20 points would be an Offensive break-out at this point. He may not be THE problem, but he ain't the solution either.

If I had said this the mods would have been all over my ass. Where are they now?
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company

Last edited by dmvskinzfan08; 10-01-2009 at 08:39 PM.
dmvskinzfan08 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-01-2009, 03:47 PM   #362
hail_2_da_skins
Impact Rookie
 
hail_2_da_skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 68
Posts: 868
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

49/83 (59%) 606 yds, 4 td's, 2 int's Mark Sanchez NYJ
69/102 (68%) 783 yds, 3 td's, 2 int's Jason Campbell WAS
87/142 (61%) 871 yds, 3 td's, 2 int's Tom Brady NE

According to the numbers, the Jets and the Patriots should be asking for Sanchez and Brady to be benched.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS"
hail_2_da_skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 04:07 PM   #363
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by hail_2_da_skins View Post
49/83 (59%) 606 yds, 4 td's, 2 int's Mark Sanchez NYJ
69/102 (68%) 783 yds, 3 td's, 2 int's Jason Campbell WAS
87/142 (61%) 871 yds, 3 td's, 2 int's Tom Brady NE

According to the numbers, the Jets and the Patriots should be asking for Sanchez and Brady to be benched.
The problem is, the Jets are 3-0 which means Mark Sanchez is automatically labeled and all star, like Flacco was last season.
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 04:07 PM   #364
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by hail_2_da_skins View Post
49/83 (59%) 606 yds, 4 td's, 2 int's Mark Sanchez NYJ
69/102 (68%) 783 yds, 3 td's, 2 int's Jason Campbell WAS
87/142 (61%) 871 yds, 3 td's, 2 int's Tom Brady NE

According to the numbers, the Jets and the Patriots should be asking for Sanchez and Brady to be benched.
Brady should be benched. He's always been a bum. The Pats should be starting Colt Brennan.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 04:10 PM   #365
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw View Post
The problem is, the Jets are 3-0 which means Mark Sanchez is automatically labeled and all star, like Flacco was last season.
The difference between them and us. They set their QBs up to suceed with good defenses and good running games. But let some people tell it. They did it all on their own. If we had the same system here JC would have had time to develop naturally. But we didn't

Same with Matt Ryan.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company
dmvskinzfan08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 04:31 PM   #366
JGisLordOfTheRings
Playmaker
 
JGisLordOfTheRings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 38
Posts: 2,583
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Last time I remember seeing a Redskins defensive Touchdown off the top of my head was 2005 when Sean Taylor helped seal the deal against the Eagles. Man that was a good year.
Last one I remember seeing was Carlos Rogers' only one probably against the Lions in 2007.
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings
JGisLordOfTheRings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 04:40 PM   #367
MonkFan4Life
The Starter
 
MonkFan4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 1,851
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08 View Post
The difference between them and us. They set their QBs up to suceed with good defenses and good running games. But let some people tell it. They did it all on their own. If we had the same system here JC would have had time to develop naturally. But we didn't

Same with Matt Ryan.
Really now ? So what you are saying is that Mark Sanchez learning his offense and running practices 2 weeks after being drafted was because of everyone around him ? If you put Mark Brunell in the game instead of Drew Brees then the Saints don't look like they do with Brees. When Brad Johnson went in for Dallas last year they looked like a completely different team. The fact is that Jason does nothing to help this team win. His stats look good at the end of the game but when was the last time you saw a Pass Inteference called on the defense while we have the ball ? You don't. Then guys deep ball accuracy is horrible but that is supposed to be his best throw. He doesn't throw the ball to a spot before the receiver breaks because he has to see the numbers before he throws it. How come he hardly ever calls audibles ? It's because the coaches tell him not to right ? Even when he is supposedly effective during the 2 min drill, when he gets to call his own plays does he ever beat a DB by throwing the ball on the money to a receiver ? No, they are all mid level throws that the receivers can rack up YAC because the D is in a prevent. His stats are padded. Point Blank.
__________________
Catch me on YouTube !

http://www.youtube.com/user/DowntimeRB?feature=mhw5

The "punishment" by the league : "It's like getting a ticket for going too fast on a road a week ago and they changed the speed limit today"
MonkFan4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 05:38 PM   #368
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by JGisLordOfTheRings View Post
Last one I remember seeing was Carlos Rogers' only one probably against the Lions in 2007.
If real life was like Madden 10 then pretty much the few interceptions we have had in the last few years would have been Touchdowns due in part because according to Madden offensive players know nothing of pursuit angles.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 06:14 PM   #369
JGisLordOfTheRings
Playmaker
 
JGisLordOfTheRings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 38
Posts: 2,583
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
If real life was like Madden 10 then pretty much the few interceptions we have had in the last few years would have been Touchdowns due in part because according to Madden offensive players know nothing of pursuit angles.
If only.....
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings
JGisLordOfTheRings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 06:15 PM   #370
JGisLordOfTheRings
Playmaker
 
JGisLordOfTheRings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 38
Posts: 2,583
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

And we would also be 3-0 because they all would have stepped out of bounds 3 yards before a first down with 40 yards of open field ahead of them.....
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings
JGisLordOfTheRings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 06:35 PM   #371
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkFan4Life View Post
Really now ? So what you are saying is that Mark Sanchez learning his offense and running practices 2 weeks after being drafted was because of everyone around him ? If you put Mark Brunell in the game instead of Drew Brees then the Saints don't look like they do with Brees. When Brad Johnson went in for Dallas last year they looked like a completely different team. The fact is that Jason does nothing to help this team win. His stats look good at the end of the game but when was the last time you saw a Pass Inteference called on the defense while we have the ball ? You don't. Then guys deep ball accuracy is horrible but that is supposed to be his best throw. He doesn't throw the ball to a spot before the receiver breaks because he has to see the numbers before he throws it. How come he hardly ever calls audibles ? It's because the coaches tell him not to right ? Even when he is supposedly effective during the 2 min drill, when he gets to call his own plays does he ever beat a DB by throwing the ball on the money to a receiver ? No, they are all mid level throws that the receivers can rack up YAC because the D is in a prevent. His stats are padded. Point Blank.
Really.

We are not talking about Mark Brunell. Brad Johnson is old that's all. But I think he did win a Superbowl after he left us. Or was that in my dreams? So you are blaming JC for us not getting Pass Interference calls? Huh? Don't know about deep ball accuracy. He hasn't thrown that many. That is something he can work on if it is an issue. Umm. So I guess he's too dumb to call audibles? When he has called the plays whether it is garbage time or not he scored. If he was so horrible he wouldn't even be able to do that.

Umm the West Coast offense is mainly intermediate throws. Your right. He puts the ball on the numbers with velocity instead of throwing to a spot or area. I woudn't blame him because our WRs keep dropping the ball. If he throws it somewhere they can catch it and he makes a completion then it really doesn't matter to me. Perfect example of throwing to an area Delhomme. He is responsible for his INTs for the most part. But some of them are because he is throwing to an area and the defense is there instead of the WR. You really want to do that with Thomas or Kelly? LOL. Even saying that Delhomme has been horrible. Maybe we should pick him up? Maybe you would be happy with a guy that throws to an area instead of completing passes. Our young receivers are not precise route runners at this point so it would be a disaster if that happened.

But you are right. He is absoultey horrible. He can't learn from his mistakes He can't grow as a QB. He is the worst QB in the NFL. He holds the ball too long. He isn't smart. He has a slow wind up release.. [end sarcasm]

Did I forget anything else? This is getting so old..
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company

Last edited by dmvskinzfan08; 10-01-2009 at 08:16 PM.
dmvskinzfan08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 08:31 PM   #372
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
It's easy to sit on the sideline and say this and that? Umm, hello? Dumbass says what? THAT IS ALL WE DO AROUND HERE! And who the hell are you to tell people to support Campbell or shut up. Kiss my ass. Are we all supposed to sit around here and blow smoke up his ass? How gay would that be? He's the QB for a team that hasn't scored 30 points in 19 games, and he's the only guy on Offense that touches the ball on every play. Hell, 20 points would be an Offensive break-out at this point. He may not be THE problem, but he ain't the solution either.


as fas as the kiss my ass comment. no thanks. Its kinda hard to anyway when you have your head so far up there. whining and bitching like a lil girl..how gay would that be? I think our offensive problems started way before campbell was starting. we were so dynamic on offense when Brunell was here weren't we. Im more like a smart ass. your the dumbass sir.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company

Last edited by dmvskinzfan08; 10-01-2009 at 11:01 PM.
dmvskinzfan08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 08:41 PM   #373
tmandoug1
Special Teams
 
tmandoug1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 394
Unhappy Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

How many of those yards and completions were done during prevent defense, need to see him do it during a reg. defense and GET US IN THE ENDZONE. Whew, this stuff is killing me. JC is still lost and making mistakes during critical times. His recievers shouldn't have to dive for the first down marker. Scared, scared young man, to afraid of throwing the ball and letting the cievers make the catch at the proper time, he always dumps off to early.
tmandoug1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 12:19 AM   #374
mike340
Special Teams
 
mike340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Posts: 322
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08 View Post
... Someone said he has yet to hit someone in stride. But then he turns around and says he hits moss is stride for a touchdown.
I'm sorry I wasn't clear. I stated that I have almost never seen him hit Moss in stride. In fact, I have almost never seen him hit a receiver running downfield in stride. Then I pointed out that the only time Moss did get it in stride he was able to take it for a TD. (I admit, Moss wasn't running downfield.) It just begs the question what would happen to TD production by the wide receivers if they were hit in stride (by JC, my late grandmother, or someone else.)
mike340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 01:18 AM   #375
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
It's easy to sit on the sideline and say this and that? Umm, hello? Dumbass says what? THAT IS ALL WE DO AROUND HERE! And who the hell are you to tell people to support Campbell or shut up. Kiss my ass. Are we all supposed to sit around here and blow smoke up his ass? How gay would that be? He's the QB for a team that hasn't scored 30 points in 19 games, and he's the only guy on Offense that touches the ball on every play. Hell, 20 points would be an Offensive break-out at this point. He may not be THE problem, but he ain't the solution either.
Is there really any need for all that? I'm no mod, but I'm sure you could've made your point and left out the name-calling.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.39959 seconds with 10 queries