Skins vs. Vikings Game Thread

RedskinRat · 01-02-2005, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by monk81

It's a mircale Redskin Rat..........Now OFFENSE do something............we need a first down and keep those chains moving..........

I'd look for a long ball from Ramsey to Coles for a TD, last thing the Vikes D will expect, they'll have 8 in the box.

Redskinsfaninnola · 01-02-2005, 04:42 PM

Only thing is can our O Line hold back the 8

Gmanc711 · 01-02-2005, 04:42 PM

Nice, Hard Run by Betts.

RedskinRat · 01-02-2005, 04:43 PM

Has Maas watched any of our games this season?

monk81 · 01-02-2005, 04:43 PM

Good effort by Betts fighting for that extra yardage....................

Gmanc711 · 01-02-2005, 04:43 PM

Jesus F"n Christ Ladell Betts With A Monster Hard Run.

Bozzy · 01-02-2005, 04:43 PM

Betts just proved why WE DO NOT NEED Clinton Portis.

RedskinRat · 01-02-2005, 04:44 PM

Betts deserved that first downb, excellent solo effort.

RedskinRat · 01-02-2005, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bozzy

Betts just proved why WE DO NOT NEED Clinton Portis.

Bozzy · 01-02-2005, 04:45 PM

Betts proved my point once again.

Gmanc711 · 01-02-2005, 04:45 PM

Another Nice Run by Betts.

monk81 · 01-02-2005, 04:45 PM

another first down...................YEAH Betts.................................good job by line too.....

Redskinsfaninnola · 01-02-2005, 04:45 PM

No We still need Portis just use Betts in the redzone and short yardage also.. he is a good blocker also for Portis.. so we need both

Bozzy · 01-02-2005, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskinsfaninnola

No We still need Portis just use Betts in the redzone and short yardage also.. he is a good blocker also for Portis.. so we need both

NO. We do not need Portis. We can use his value to get tons of talent. Betts can easily handle the full time RB duties.

monk81 · 01-02-2005, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskinsfaninnola

No We still need Portis just use Betts in the redzone and short yardage also.. he is a good blocker also for Portis.. so we need both

I concur.....................

01-02-2005, 04:42 PM	#318
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	Nice, Hard Run by Betts. __________________ #21

01-02-2005, 04:43 PM	#321
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	Jesus F"n Christ Ladell Betts With A Monster Hard Run. __________________ #21

01-02-2005, 04:45 PM	#326
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	Another Nice Run by Betts. __________________ #21

01-02-2005, 04:42 PM	#317
Redskinsfaninnola Camp Scrub Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 31	Only thing is can our O Line hold back the 8

01-02-2005, 04:43 PM	#319
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	Has Maas watched any of our games this season?

01-02-2005, 04:43 PM	#320
monk81 The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: TEXAS Posts: 2,029	Good effort by Betts fighting for that extra yardage....................

01-02-2005, 04:43 PM	#322
Bozzy The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 44 Posts: 1,034	Betts just proved why WE DO NOT NEED Clinton Portis.

01-02-2005, 04:44 PM	#323
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	Betts deserved that first downb, excellent solo effort.

01-02-2005, 04:45 PM	#325
Bozzy The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 44 Posts: 1,034	Betts proved my point once again.

01-02-2005, 04:45 PM	#327
monk81 The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: TEXAS Posts: 2,029	another first down...................YEAH Betts.................................good job by line too.....

01-02-2005, 04:45 PM	#328
Redskinsfaninnola Camp Scrub Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 31	No We still need Portis just use Betts in the redzone and short yardage also.. he is a good blocker also for Portis.. so we need both

Locker Room Main Forum