Redskins Add WRs Pierre Garcon and Joshua Morgan

[Gmanc711]

Now hearing Royal deal still not done..

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by SkinzWin

And this is code for...

“@DonteStallworth: "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving." *-Albert Einstein”

Quick, someone hacked Stallworth's twitter account.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by skinster

Not one of those receivers has ever had 1,000yds in their career, the O-line is beyond junk, and RGIII is a rookie. I'm not hating because I'm excited to see how it pans out also, but "scary" is a vast overstatement.

I think you bring a good point...and I would like to emphasize how much of a departure from the "old ways' these signings are. All of these guys are 25-26, haven't reach their full potential. And they may end up reaching 1000+ yds as Redskins.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

New word for Ruhskins

I see Ruhskins still hasn't added 'heloing' to his sig. I consider this an outrage and that he be docked 30% of his post.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

I see Ruhskins still hasn't added 'heloing' to his sig. I consider this an outrage and that he be docked 30% of his post.

Is this collusion? A secret, unspoken agreement that I need to add all misspelled words? LOL.

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by Skinsfanatic

Hankerson___Royal_____Davis___OL____Cooley___Morga n____Garcon

Shotgun

RGIII


It ain't every down, but it is scary looking.

12 men on the field shouldn't be happening on ANY down!

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I think you bring a good point...and I would like to emphasize how much of a departure from the "old ways' these signings are. All of these guys are 25-26, haven't reach their full potential. And they may end up reaching 1000+ yds as Redskins.

Yes sir. Better to catch them on the ascent than on the descent.

Besides, Garcon came close to 1,000 yards with Curtis Freakin' Painter in charge of the offense.

[CapitalPunishment]

Do you guys think that it should be a concern that LH is our tallest WR at 6'2? I mean, if he pans out, awesome. But without him, we are looking at Davis for our jump balls? Not a huge factor in all this, but just curious what others though.

Also, maybe someone can answer this for me. When a team makes a trade for a restricted player and is required to give up a 1st round pick...does that team, if they have two 1st rounders, have the right to give them whatever 1st rounder they want? Or do they have to give them the pick that the team earned by their own record?

[donofriose]

Signings were a little bit too much for me but at least we got young players. We still need help on the OLINE, MLB, and secondary, but maybe they have a plan through the draft we will see. still would have liked to go after the kid from the texans but he might have been too expensive. Who knows.

[Skinsfanatic]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

12 men on the field shouldn't be happening on ANY down!

I am waiting for everyone to point out my mistake. Thanks for getting me closer to that goal.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by CapitalPunishment

Do you guys think that it should be a concern that LH is our tallest WR at 6'2? I mean, if he pans out, awesome. But without him, we are looking at Davis for our jump balls? Not a huge factor in all this, but just curious what others though.

Also, maybe someone can answer this for me. When a team makes a trade for a restricted player and is required to give up a 1st round pick...does that team, if they have two 1st rounders, have the right to give them whatever 1st rounder they want? Or do they have to give them the pick that the team earned by their own record?

In his one game, Hank was showing some good vertical ability. It would be nice to get a big guy though, although at this point WR would be an overkill.

[donofriose]

Originally Posted by CapitalPunishment

Do you guys think that it should be a concern that LH is our tallest WR at 6'2? I mean, if he pans out, awesome. But without him, we are looking at Davis for our jump balls? Not a huge factor in all this, but just curious what others though.

Also, maybe someone can answer this for me. When a team makes a trade for a restricted player and is required to give up a 1st round pick...does that team, if they have two 1st rounders, have the right to give them whatever 1st rounder they want? Or do they have to give them the pick that the team earned by their own record?

If you have a big athletic tight end you don't necessarily need a tall receiver on the outside, it helps but its not necessary, The Packers and Patriots don't really have giant all receivers. I believe the first round that your record indicates, so if the Patriots wanted to give up a pick it would be the 31 and not the 27th. Not sure though.

[donofriose]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

In his one game, Hank was showing some good vertical ability. It would be nice to get a big guy though, although at this point WR would be an overkill.

I forgot about Hank but yea he is lengthy but we have at least decent size in regards to WR and tight end.

[mbedner3420]

Originally Posted by Gmanc711

Now hearing Royal deal still not done..

Wikipedia has his banner in burgundy and gold. And we know wikipedia never lies, which is why I cited it on all my college papers...

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by donofriose

If you have a big athletic tight end you don't necessarily need a tall receiver on the outside, it helps but its not necessary, The Packers and Patriots don't really have giant all receivers. I believe the first round that your record indicates, so if the Patriots wanted to give up a pick it would be the 31 and not the 27th. Not sure though.

You are correct. You surrender the pick you earned, not the pick you traded for.