What's your take on our coaching?

SOUL-SKINS · 11-03-2011, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Shanahan can publicly say what he wants. He didn't believe in April and he doesn't believe now that Beck is the long term answer. That QB isn't on our roster.

Then what the hell is he doing??? Instead of drafting 15 Wr, shouldn't he then put some stock into some rookie qb.... Maybe even Mallet.
Yeah Mallet isn't " his style" qb but either is Rex..... And Beck ... Well I'm having a hard time that he's a qb period.

SFREDSKIN · 11-04-2011, 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GusFrerotte

Then why the hell did he get him? Shoot why didn't we draft Ponder or Dalton. That non move will ensure us at least 2 more crappy football seasons, and then the overhaul that will be due in year 4 of Shanny's reign isn't guaranteed either. I am not expecting playoffs Smooty, but I would like to actually enjoy watching the Skins win or lose. This isn't even a fun past time anymore. I mean seriously, I can go down the road on I-94 and see a good MAC football game for one tenth the cost of a NFL game, with free parking!!!!!!!!

My guess is as crazy as it sounds, that he has had his eye on a college QB coming out in next years draft that he really wants, as is patiently waiting.

Lotus · 11-04-2011, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

My guess is as crazy as it sounds, that he has had his eye on a college QB coming out in next years draft that he really wants, as is patiently waiting.

It doesn't sound crazy at all. In fact, it sounds like a lock.

sportscurmudgeon · 11-04-2011, 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

My guess is as crazy as it sounds, that he has had his eye on a college QB coming out in next years draft that he really wants, as is patiently waiting.

This is a self-fulfilling prophesy. At the end of the 2011 NFL season, it will be clear to everyone - - fans, analysts, writers, sportsradio dudes and the Skins' coaching staff - - that Rex Grossman and/or John Beck are not "Franchise QBs"

At that point, the Skins will either :

Draft the guy they will say is the QB of the future

Sign a free agent who is a starting caliber QB in the NFL and declare him the future QB

Sign a free agent AND draft a QB of the future.

And at that point the idea that Mike Shanahan had his eye on whomever the Skins draft or sign all along will be "proven" correct.

SmootSmack · 11-04-2011, 07:56 AM

He didn't get his QB because he hasn't been available. This past draft we would have taken Locker. I'm convinced of that. Have talked to too many people who should know who say that was the plan. But the Titans took him. And Shanahan decided his second choice (apparently Gabbert) wasn't worth as much as trading down and adding more pieces.

53Fan · 11-04-2011, 08:30 AM

^ That makes perfect sense to me and I have no problem with it. We gained draft choices instead of drafting a QB just for the sake of drafting one. It makes no sense to draft a QB who the coaches don't believe will be very good.

Sonny9TD · 11-04-2011, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

He didn't get his QB because he hasn't been available. This past draft we would have taken Locker. I'm convinced of that. Have talked to too many people who should know who say that was the plan. But the Titans took him. And Shanahan decided his second choice (apparently Gabbert) wasn't worth as much as trading down and adding more pieces.

I'd like to see us do some trading and offer a few draft picks to the Titans and try to get Locker. It would be easier to do than getting Luck. I think they could make that happen. I like Locker big time. He is a player and I wanted him bad for my beloved Hogs. I would like to see the Skins do some dealing to get him. He would be perfect for us.

SmootSmack · 11-04-2011, 09:26 AM

More likely to be able to get Bradford if the Rams are in position to get Luck than we are to get Locker from the Titans.

53Fan · 11-04-2011, 09:33 AM

IMO getting Bradford would take care of the QB position for years. Wouldn't that be nice.

Unfortunately I think the Colts or Dolphins get this pick. I heard some talk the other day that if Manning only wanted to play for 2 more years, the Colts could let Luck sit on the bench and learn from him. Sort of like Rodgers and Favre. BUT...if Manning wanted to play for 3-4 more years, it wouldn't make sense. It's definitely going to be interesting come draft time.

NC_Skins · 11-04-2011, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

More likely to be able to get Bradford if the Rams are in position to get Luck than we are to get Locker from the Titans.

I know the point you are making here, but do you think the Rams would select Luck and trade Bradford? I personally don't see it.

skinsfan69 · 11-04-2011, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

He didn't get his QB because he hasn't been available. This past draft we would have taken Locker. I'm convinced of that. Have talked to too many people who should know who say that was the plan. But the Titans took him. And Shanahan decided his second choice (apparently Gabbert) wasn't worth as much as trading down and adding more pieces.

I'm starting to think that MS really isn't a very good personel guy. He's proven that with his track record.

skins89moss · 11-04-2011, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33

My take is that football isn't rocket science and the coaches aren't infallible.

You are right football isn't rocket science its football.

skins89moss · 11-04-2011, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

With the state of our o-line right now, Banks would get killed running the wildcat. I don't fault anyone for not running the ball now, but we didn't run the ball when the o-line was healthy.

Stop saying Banks would be killed or he is to small to play on offense. Damn Banks has been playing football all his life and so far he has not been killed. He did play at Kansas St on offense and special teams. Im not suggesting Banks can play every down but he damn well can play 10 snaps a game on offense. Remember the defense cannot touch wr anymore down field so why not take a few shots with him.

SmootSmack · 11-04-2011, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

I know the point you are making here, but do you think the Rams would select Luck and trade Bradford? I personally don't see it.

I don't know. But if they have the first overall pick, I can't imagine them not taking Luck and I can't imagine them keeping both. But then Arizona that already has Kolb, and Jacksonville with Gabbert are in the hunt for that top spot as well so it could get really interesting

I'm 100% behind getting a QB. Having been say for months now we need not 1 but 2 new QBs. That said though, I don't think that Shanahan's decision not to take a QB just to take one is an indication that he's proven not to be a good personnel guy. I think he's ok, kind of middle of the road I suppose. You spend as long as he has doing what he does there are going to be hits and misses

Hog1 · 11-04-2011, 10:42 AM

Good Read on Kyle and the Buff game in the News section of the WP if you have not seen it. Nobody gets thrown under the bus but........

Redskins' Kyle Shanahan fine with all his critics | John Keim | NFL | Washington Examiner

View Poll Results: Should Mike Shanahan be on the "hot seat"?
Yes	39	27.46%
No	103	72.54%
Voters: 142. You may not vote on this poll

11-04-2011, 07:56 AM	#290
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	He didn't get his QB because he hasn't been available. This past draft we would have taken Locker. I'm convinced of that. Have talked to too many people who should know who say that was the plan. But the Titans took him. And Shanahan decided his second choice (apparently Gabbert) wasn't worth as much as trading down and adding more pieces. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

11-04-2011, 08:30 AM	#291
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: What's your take on our coaching? ^ That makes perfect sense to me and I have no problem with it. We gained draft choices instead of drafting a QB just for the sake of drafting one. It makes no sense to draft a QB who the coaches don't believe will be very good. __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it! Last edited by 53Fan; 11-04-2011 at 08:32 AM.

11-04-2011, 09:26 AM	#293
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: What's your take on our coaching? More likely to be able to get Bradford if the Rams are in position to get Luck than we are to get Locker from the Titans. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

11-04-2011, 09:33 AM	#294
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: What's your take on our coaching? IMO getting Bradford would take care of the QB position for years. Wouldn't that be nice. Unfortunately I think the Colts or Dolphins get this pick. I heard some talk the other day that if Manning only wanted to play for 2 more years, the Colts could let Luck sit on the bench and learn from him. Sort of like Rodgers and Favre. BUT...if Manning wanted to play for 3-4 more years, it wouldn't make sense. It's definitely going to be interesting come draft time. __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it! Last edited by 53Fan; 11-04-2011 at 09:37 AM.

11-04-2011, 10:42 AM	#300
Hog1 Quietly Dominating the East Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Naples, Florida Posts: 10,675	Re: What's your take on our coaching? Good Read on Kyle and the Buff game in the News section of the WP if you have not seen it. Nobody gets thrown under the bus but........ Redskins' Kyle Shanahan fine with all his critics \| John Keim \| NFL \| Washington Examiner __________________ Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... *“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs*

What's your take on our coaching?

Locker Room Main Forum