|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-24-2005, 08:34 AM | #16 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MANASSAS VA
Age: 62
Posts: 323
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
lavar , i missed you. you are the emontional leader of the d, and now that you have submited to the d coach. skys the limit at what you and this can accomplish.great game.
|
Advertisements |
10-24-2005, 08:57 AM | #17 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
Quote:
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
10-24-2005, 09:03 AM | #18 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
LaVar is only going to get better as the year goes on...
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
10-24-2005, 09:38 AM | #19 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
Quote:
I can only speak for myself, and once again I wasn't hating on LaVar, I simply supported the decision to sit him. |
|
10-24-2005, 09:40 AM | #20 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
Quote:
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
10-24-2005, 09:43 AM | #21 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
I agree. People REALLY just LOVE the "told-ya-so".
We're all friends here, just be satisfied in your mind if you feel the need to call people out. Otherwise things will get ugly and it'll be negative things to read through when we just won fifty-freakin'-two to seventeen!! WOOHOO.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
10-24-2005, 09:55 AM | #22 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
I am one to say the "told ya so" I couldn't wait to get on here today and see what all of "trade LaVar, sit him, cut him" people had to say. you know who you are, and I remember who you are. I have been the most outspoken supporter of LA since all this crap started happening. I just hope its not an allusion, and Gibbs and Co. have him sitting again next week.
LA looked awesome. He was all over the field. and how bout this, only played about 20 snaps, maybe 50%, and still led the team in tackles. The man is a beast, and I will gladly accept all apologies from those who dogged me and railcon56 over the last several weeks!! GREAT GAME TEAM!!! |
10-24-2005, 10:29 AM | #23 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 219
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
Quote:
6-0 had he been playing during the two losses. Oh well, we'll never know. I'm just glad he's finally been allowed out of the doghouse. I didn't agree with the decision to bench him and couldn't understand why it was being done. But, hopefully, that's history now. We need him now because the opponents only get tougher. |
|
10-24-2005, 10:30 AM | #24 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,340
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
I've never supported the decision to sit Lavar, and this game makes my point for me. He's a playmaker, he makes things happen, and he should be on the field 100% of the time. Period.
We can speculate that his play against the 9ers was inspired by his recent benching.....maybe that's the case, maybe it's not. I honestly don't care as long as #56 gets on the field. I will say this, however. The way he played yesterday makes me wish he was in there to chase down Priest Holmes, Larry Johnson, and Tatum Bell in our last two losses. I'm just saying...
__________________
"Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!" |
10-24-2005, 11:14 AM | #25 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
Quote:
And just so you know, you're never going to hear an apology for the LaVar haters because everyone will magically forget the remarks they made about the defense being better without him, or him being overrated, etc. Just be happy that he's playing and playing well. |
|
10-24-2005, 11:15 AM | #26 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 68
Posts: 868
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
If anyone doubts what "56" brings to the table needs to look at the 49ers game again. The enthusiasm that he brings to the defense is infectious. The D-line, linebackers and secondary was flying to the ball. The whole defense played at a higher level. Welcome home Levar! Look out Eli!
|
10-24-2005, 11:20 AM | #27 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
LaVar did the talking like i knew he would!!!! No need to say anything for me...Except you saw a tired rusty LaVar yesterday who didnt even play the whole game.... Stay Tuned!!! The Giants and Eagles have to change their whole offensive game plans ...now that Mr. Arrington is back!!!!
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!! |
10-24-2005, 11:20 AM | #28 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
Quote:
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
10-24-2005, 11:21 AM | #29 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
Quote:
|
|
10-24-2005, 11:31 AM | #30 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged)
Funny how I don't seem to remember many 'haters' of Lavar. Seemed like us so called 'haters' were simply SUPPORTERS of the coaches and you all were the 'haters'. The 'haters' of the coaches. Anyone wanna get in a discussion about whether we'd be 1-5 if Lavar had played more early on? It's just as speculative of a discussion as the told-ya-so statements that we'd be 5-1 or 6-0. Is it possible that maybe the time sitting out prepared him him to play well when he finally came in? Is it possible he'd have been a detriment prior to yesterday without the sitting out? It's all speculation so maybe we ought to lay off the told-ya-so stuff since no one can win an argument that has no possible outcome. We can't go back and find out now can we?
|
|
|