Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2014, 10:30 AM   #16
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Positive: Haslett's adjustments at half time

Negative: Haslett's foolish original game plan that required half time adjustments

on another note:
In preseason, I saw many players psyched to ball out and play hard. I don't see that any more. You're doing something wrong if you are not psyched to play the defending champs but we weren't psyched.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-07-2014, 10:50 AM   #17
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,723
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

How i envisioned RGIII in year 3.

Russell Wilson Embodies Elite Quarterback Play in 'MNF' Win over Washington | Bleacher Report

Only the Redskins could ruin the sure fire thing.

Fawking Griffin. Thanks for nothing.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 10:54 AM   #18
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
How i envisioned RGIII in year 3.

Russell Wilson Embodies Elite Quarterback Play in 'MNF' Win over Washington | Bleacher Report

Only the Redskins could ruin the sure fire thing.

Fawking Griffin. Thanks for nothing.
How did they ruin a sure thing? He got hurt twice. That's not the Redskins fault.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:07 AM   #19
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,723
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
How did they ruin a sure thing? He got hurt twice. That's not the Redskins fault.
I know; just frustrated.

Even outside of the injuries he is not progressing.

It sucks he cost us a boat load of picks and set us pack at QB for another 5 years.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:18 AM   #20
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,412
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
How did they ruin a sure thing? He got hurt twice. That's not the Redskins fault.
If we dont get plan B together this offseason, it will be the Redskins fault. RG3 proven he cannot stay healthy, unfortunately we need to come up with a viable back up plan. Continue to develop Cousins? I dont see him as the long term solution in a Gruden offense.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:30 AM   #21
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,380
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
If we dont get plan B together this offseason, it will be the Redskins fault. RG3 proven he cannot stay healthy, unfortunately we need to come up with a viable back up plan. Continue to develop Cousins? I dont see him as the long term solution in a Gruden offense.
Truthfully Cousins with a first or second round non-bust right tackle probably succeeds. I think we move away from the Shanahan zone and get heavy up front.

Lotus I agree about Haslett, in game he gets better but coming into the game his defense just is never prepared. That was behind my impetuous fire Haslett comment in the game thread after the first Seahawks score.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:35 AM   #22
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,412
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Truthfully Cousins with a first or second round non-bust right tackle probably succeeds. I think we move away from the Shanahan zone and get heavy up front.

Lotus I agree about Haslett, in game he gets better but coming into the game his defense just is never prepared. That was behind my impetuous fire Haslett comment in the game thread after the first Seahawks score.
Yeah, I think its going to take more than a RT for Cousins to be successful. I think if Cousins is on the Seahawks last night against us, Seahawks lose. The difference in the game (yes Special teams is always the answer but) was the mobility of Wilson. Big plays time and time again
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:37 AM   #23
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Truthfully Cousins with a first or second round non-bust right tackle probably succeeds. I think we move away from the Shanahan zone and get heavy up front.

Lotus I agree about Haslett, in game he gets better but coming into the game his defense just is never prepared. That was behind my impetuous fire Haslett comment in the game thread after the first Seahawks score.
You can say the same thing about the offense. I think the only time we had a successful first drive was against the Eagles and Jaguars. Other than that, the offense seems to always come unprepared.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:38 AM   #24
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,402
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Quote:
Accountability in the front office. Folks, take a look at Seattle's starting roster vs ours, as you can see it is stacked with players taken in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th rounds all drafted within the team. Seattle been able to pic and develop their own talent far better than we have. Bruce, Scott Campbell, Doug Williams and scouts need to be held accountable now that we have moved away from the stupidity which the Snyder/Ceratto strategy of trade drafts picks and over pay POS. We should see better results, we are not. This was just an observation when watching last night.

When I questioned why in the fuck were we bringing in the likes of Doug Williams (who hasn't proved jack shit as a FA scout), you get met with "give it time...or don't overreact." It didn't take a genius to see that Bruce has brought back the ole Tampa Bay Country Club connections, and it isn't going to work. The moment they allowed Jim Haslett to stay is the moment that Bruce should have been removed from any decision making abilities involved with this team. He needs to be in charge of operations, but NOT personnel.

We need better players. We need better scouts. We need a better GM that'll fucking listen to our scouts. Back up the Brink truck for a guy like Eric Decosta or hire another young hungry guy who's trying to make his mark on this game.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:40 AM   #25
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Yeah, I think its going to take more than a RT for Cousins to be successful. I think if Cousins is on the Seahawks last night against us, Seahawks lose. The difference in the game (yes Special teams is always the answer but) was the mobility of Wilson. Big plays time and time again
If you put Cousins in the Seahawks, with a healthy Lynch, they definitely win the game. But unlike Wilson, Cousins cannot overcome the lack of a running game (32 rushing yards).
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:41 AM   #26
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,462
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Where has Garçon been? He's a guy they need to get the ball to more than twice a game.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:44 AM   #27
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Where has Garçon been? He's a guy they need to get the ball to more than twice a game.
For real. All the balls have been going to our TEs and DJax. He only had two catches last night.

Also, I don't know why the team didn't go to screen passes more often, especially since the Seattle D-line is so aggressive.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:44 AM   #28
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,402
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
How i envisioned RGIII in year 3.

Russell Wilson Embodies Elite Quarterback Play in 'MNF' Win over Washington | Bleacher Report

Only the Redskins could ruin the sure fire thing.

Fawking Griffin. Thanks for nothing.

Griffin was anything but a sure fire thing. He was a huge project all along. He played in a spread offense in college so nobody knew if he was going to make the transition or not. His potential and ability landed him in the spot he was drafted. Luck on the other hand was the sure fire thing (even though nothing is sure fire) because he played in a pro-style offense in college and excelled in it.

That's why you don't waste a bunch of picks on a project. It's moronic and something only bad teams do.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:44 AM   #29
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,412
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
If you put Cousins in the Seahawks, with a healthy Lynch, they definitely win the game. But unlike Wilson, Cousins cannot overcome the lack of a running game (32 rushing yards).
Yeah I thought holding Lynch and Turbin to 91 yards rushing at a 4.1 avg was a win for us. Obviously better than we did, but a baller named Wilson, his legs were the difference imo
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:49 AM   #30
Gary84Clark
Registered User
 
Gary84Clark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,035
Re: Skins vs Seasquawks Positive and Negatives

Alfmo always has running lanes when RG3 is in the on the field. This Cousins is a Rex replay imo.
Gary84Clark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.46728 seconds with 10 queries