Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

e16bball · 03-10-2005, 09:33 PM

I really don't think the original projections by wewhite are too far off what I am expecting. A passer rating of 85.0 would have been basically middle of the road in the NFL and not unlike what he posted in his starts last year. 24 TDs is a fair amount, especially in a run-based offense, but its possible. 9 INTS is kind of few, but also possible. I think something like 21 TDs and 12 INTs is very reasonable. 3000 yards is also easily attainable if he plays all 16 games.

e16bball · 03-10-2005, 09:36 PM

Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that he should complete at least 60% of his passes in this offense.

heybigstar · 03-10-2005, 09:44 PM

I see the Skins surprising everybody behind the underrated wr corp, ST and the nasty D, and Ramsey the gun slinger...

SmootSmack · 03-10-2005, 10:02 PM

heybigstar, might be time to change that sig

Riggo44 · 03-10-2005, 10:08 PM

I think Ramsey is going to have a great year in 2005. With Jansen back and a year under his belt with Gibbs Ramsey should be primed and ready to go.

TheMalcolmConnection · 03-10-2005, 10:24 PM

Most definitely. A lot of people are waaay too pessimistic. We HAVE seen signs of greatness out of Ramsey. I definitely think he has it in him and with an upgraded line and WR corps, I think this might be his breakout year.

jermus22 · 03-10-2005, 10:24 PM

Ramsey does NOT need to complete 60% in a Gibbs offense. In '87, the year we won with Doug Williams, he only completed somewhere around 56%, and in '91, Mark Rypien hit 59%, made the Pro Bowl, and got Super Bowl MVP. I know it's a new era of football with new expectations, but I don't think a guy needs to hit 60% to do well. We just need to hit the necessary throws on third down and get the deep ball when opponents stack for the run.

TheMalcolmConnection · 03-10-2005, 10:30 PM

Exactly, AND the playcalling will be a bit more aggresive this year too.

DragoJT87 · 03-10-2005, 10:33 PM

Ramsey does not need to comlete 100% of his passes he does not need to complete 30% of his passes. He does not need to throw more than 20 TD's or less than 10 INT's. Rating Schmating. Patrick Ramsey needs to go 4-2 against the NFC East, 3-1 against the NFC West, and 3-1 against the AFC West. And beat either Chicago or Tampa. However his numbers look after that is ok with me.

mooby · 03-10-2005, 10:34 PM

yeah we were horrible on third down last year. with an upgraded o line, a nasty defense that will be even nastier with lavar back, okay special teams (im still feeling the loss when we let baltimore win the game by that punt return, and when we could've had a shutout of new york if we didn't give up that kick return), and c.p. we will easily make the playoffs. how about portis's numbers. i see him getting around 1800 yards if he's healthy, and about 15 rushing touchdowns. portis would've had 1500 yards last year if it wasn't for those games where he had like 55 yards, 17 yards, etc.

TheMalcolmConnection · 03-10-2005, 10:35 PM

I'm also excited to see a rejuvenated line to be able to open the running game up (and passing game).

mooby · 03-10-2005, 10:39 PM

hey drago, who do you think we will lose against in the nfc east, the nfc west, and against the afc west? i think we could easily beat philadelphia,(lets not forget how close we came last year, until ramsey threw that int), we can easily beat st. louis(they have lost easy games last year), and if you think we are gonna lose to the raiders in the afc west you are mightily mistaken cuz even with randy moss they still won't win(look back to our game against the vikes last year).

TheMalcolmConnection · 03-10-2005, 10:40 PM

16-0 baby.

DragoJT87 · 03-10-2005, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mooby

hey drago, who do you think we will lose against in the nfc east, the nfc west, and against the afc west? i think we could easily beat philadelphia,(lets not forget how close we came last year, until ramsey threw that int), we can easily beat st. louis(they have lost easy games last year), and if you think we are gonna lose to the raiders in the afc west you are mightily mistaken cuz even with randy moss they still won't win(look back to our game against the vikes last year).

I think we can beat NYG twice they don't impress or scare me. Philly is beatable and that's why we'll split with them. Dallas is extremely beatable for everyone in the league but us so we'll split with them. In the AFC West, I think we have everyone handled except KC. They still have Holmes and a pretty goob QB in Green(Ex-Redskin). The NFC west is tricky. If we lose to San Fran or Ariz we don't deserve 10-6 anyway, but STL and Seattle are dangerous when the want to be. Even if we lose to both Tampa and Chicago that still puts us at 10-6 with good AFC and NFC and Div. records. We cannot, under and circumstances, get swept by any of thes divisions.

TheMalcolmConnection · 03-10-2005, 11:27 PM

Exactly. For some reason, it still blows my mind that KC is ANY good.

03-10-2005, 09:33 PM	#16
e16bball Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 163	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! I really don't think the original projections by wewhite are too far off what I am expecting. A passer rating of 85.0 would have been basically middle of the road in the NFL and not unlike what he posted in his starts last year. 24 TDs is a fair amount, especially in a run-based offense, but its possible. 9 INTS is kind of few, but also possible. I think something like 21 TDs and 12 INTs is very reasonable. 3000 yards is also easily attainable if he plays all 16 games.

03-10-2005, 09:36 PM	#17
e16bball Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 163	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that he should complete at least 60% of his passes in this offense.

03-10-2005, 09:44 PM	#18
heybigstar Special Teams Join Date: Oct 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 375	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! I see the Skins surprising everybody behind the underrated wr corp, ST and the nasty D, and Ramsey the gun slinger... __________________ Hail to the Redskins.

03-10-2005, 10:02 PM	#19
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! heybigstar, might be time to change that sig __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

03-10-2005, 10:08 PM	#20
Riggo44 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: San Clemente CA Age: 51 Posts: 2,390	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! I think Ramsey is going to have a great year in 2005. With Jansen back and a year under his belt with Gibbs Ramsey should be primed and ready to go. __________________ Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. Benjamin Franklin

03-10-2005, 10:24 PM	#21
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! Most definitely. A lot of people are waaay too pessimistic. We HAVE seen signs of greatness out of Ramsey. I definitely think he has it in him and with an upgraded line and WR corps, I think this might be his breakout year. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

03-10-2005, 10:24 PM	#22
jermus22 Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Martinsburg, WV Age: 42 Posts: 334	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! Ramsey does NOT need to complete 60% in a Gibbs offense. In '87, the year we won with Doug Williams, he only completed somewhere around 56%, and in '91, Mark Rypien hit 59%, made the Pro Bowl, and got Super Bowl MVP. I know it's a new era of football with new expectations, but I don't think a guy needs to hit 60% to do well. We just need to hit the necessary throws on third down and get the deep ball when opponents stack for the run. __________________ Win it in the trenches.

03-10-2005, 10:30 PM	#23
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! Exactly, AND the playcalling will be a bit more aggresive this year too. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

03-10-2005, 10:33 PM	#24
DragoJT87 Camp Scrub Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: So. Md. Age: 44 Posts: 32	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! Ramsey does not need to comlete 100% of his passes he does not need to complete 30% of his passes. He does not need to throw more than 20 TD's or less than 10 INT's. Rating Schmating. Patrick Ramsey needs to go 4-2 against the NFC East, 3-1 against the NFC West, and 3-1 against the AFC West. And beat either Chicago or Tampa. However his numbers look after that is ok with me.

03-10-2005, 10:34 PM	#25
mooby Hug Anne Spyder Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 20,446	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! yeah we were horrible on third down last year. with an upgraded o line, a nasty defense that will be even nastier with lavar back, okay special teams (im still feeling the loss when we let baltimore win the game by that punt return, and when we could've had a shutout of new york if we didn't give up that kick return), and c.p. we will easily make the playoffs. how about portis's numbers. i see him getting around 1800 yards if he's healthy, and about 15 rushing touchdowns. portis would've had 1500 yards last year if it wasn't for those games where he had like 55 yards, 17 yards, etc. __________________ Hail to the Football Team

03-10-2005, 10:35 PM	#26
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! I'm also excited to see a rejuvenated line to be able to open the running game up (and passing game). __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

03-10-2005, 10:39 PM	#27
mooby Hug Anne Spyder Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 20,446	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! hey drago, who do you think we will lose against in the nfc east, the nfc west, and against the afc west? i think we could easily beat philadelphia,(lets not forget how close we came last year, until ramsey threw that int), we can easily beat st. louis(they have lost easy games last year), and if you think we are gonna lose to the raiders in the afc west you are mightily mistaken cuz even with randy moss they still won't win(look back to our game against the vikes last year). __________________ Hail to the Football Team

03-10-2005, 10:40 PM	#28
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! 16-0 baby. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

03-10-2005, 11:27 PM	#30
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! Exactly. For some reason, it still blows my mind that KC is ANY good. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

Locker Room Main Forum