Trevor Pryce on the Trading Block

Schneed10 · 02-15-2005, 09:20 AM

Pryce would be terrible for us. The most important thing in all of this is his salary cap number. He's due to make somewhere between 6-7 million in base salaries this year, 7-8 million next year, and around 9 million in 2007. The Redskins can't afford that much on the salary cap. It's impossible, and the team would never consider it.

jbcjr14 · 02-15-2005, 10:43 AM

No, no, no, no, no!!!!! Not worth it and the D will get better with Lavar and Daniels back in the lineup.

MTK · 02-15-2005, 11:58 AM

I'd definitely pass on Pryce

SKINSnCANES · 02-15-2005, 12:39 PM

Theres probably a good chance that lavar plays end a lot next year. or atleast lines up close to teh line in a three point stace. He doesnt realrly have the technique, he just uses his athletic ability. This is clearly seen when good linemen just pick him up with ease. But if he practice it this offseason then he should become a lot more effective at blitzing.

The key though is going to be able to get pressure with our front four, which we havent been able to do. The corner and linebacker, and even safety blitzes worked great, but we were dependent on them. Even having bowen back will help, he was getting pretty good at blitzing before he went out, and we are better off having taylor in coverage then having to blitz.

sportscurmudgeon · 02-15-2005, 03:31 PM

Trevor Pryce is a better DE than anyone the Redskins have had on their roster since Charles Mann retired.

However, he is not nearly good enough to trade for (meaning the Skins would lose players and/or picks) AND then consume about $6M in cap room on a team that needs to add talent and has precious little cap room to begin with.

The Skins can upgrade the DL for a lot less than that - - even thoughTrevor Pryce is a fine player.

TheMalcolmConnection · 02-15-2005, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbcjr14

No, no, no, no, no!!!!! Not worth it and the D will get better with Lavar and Daniels back in the lineup.

Exactly, we do always forget Daniels. Since the defense played well enough all year, I think give Daniels a year to see how he works out at DE and maybe pick up a WR in the draft.

drew54 · 02-16-2005, 02:44 AM

New rule in DC should be no one over 29.

MTK · 02-16-2005, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drew54

New rule in DC should be no one over 29.

Other than Brunell that's pretty much how it's been the past two offseasons or so.

02-15-2005, 09:20 AM	#16
Schneed10 A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 45 Posts: 12,421	Re: Trevor Pryce on the Trading Block Pryce would be terrible for us. The most important thing in all of this is his salary cap number. He's due to make somewhere between 6-7 million in base salaries this year, 7-8 million next year, and around 9 million in 2007. The Redskins can't afford that much on the salary cap. It's impossible, and the team would never consider it.

02-15-2005, 10:43 AM	#17
jbcjr14 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Austin, Texas Age: 54 Posts: 2,015	Re: Trevor Pryce on the Trading Block No, no, no, no, no!!!!! Not worth it and the D will get better with Lavar and Daniels back in the lineup. __________________ "Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.

02-15-2005, 11:58 AM	#18
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,464	Re: Trevor Pryce on the Trading Block I'd definitely pass on Pryce

02-15-2005, 12:39 PM	#19
SKINSnCANES Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: New Jersey Age: 42 Posts: 5,454	Re: Trevor Pryce on the Trading Block Theres probably a good chance that lavar plays end a lot next year. or atleast lines up close to teh line in a three point stace. He doesnt realrly have the technique, he just uses his athletic ability. This is clearly seen when good linemen just pick him up with ease. But if he practice it this offseason then he should become a lot more effective at blitzing. The key though is going to be able to get pressure with our front four, which we havent been able to do. The corner and linebacker, and even safety blitzes worked great, but we were dependent on them. Even having bowen back will help, he was getting pretty good at blitzing before he went out, and we are better off having taylor in coverage then having to blitz. __________________ "I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis

02-15-2005, 03:31 PM	#20
sportscurmudgeon Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,159	Re: Trevor Pryce on the Trading Block Trevor Pryce is a better DE than anyone the Redskins have had on their roster since Charles Mann retired. However, he is not nearly good enough to trade for (meaning the Skins would lose players and/or picks) AND then consume about $6M in cap room on a team that needs to add talent and has precious little cap room to begin with. The Skins can upgrade the DL for a lot less than that - - even thoughTrevor Pryce is a fine player. __________________ The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports...

02-16-2005, 02:44 AM	#22
drew54 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: IOWA Age: 42 Posts: 1,324	Re: Trevor Pryce on the Trading Block New rule in DC should be no one over 29.

Trevor Pryce on the Trading Block

Locker Room Main Forum