|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-11-2004, 12:46 AM | #16 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Quote:
|
|
Advertisements |
11-11-2004, 01:21 AM | #17 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
11-11-2004, 08:15 AM | #18 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
thanks smootsmack
|
11-11-2004, 09:30 AM | #19 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaVale MD
Age: 62
Posts: 515
|
Djnemo, I won't argue that Ramsey is not a rookie or an inexperienced back-up. Ramsey's been through the wars and back. However, I think that Gibbs' offense is not the kind of thing that you can take in and understand in month or two. If anything, that would explain Gibbs' preference for veteran players because in most cases they have the insight of being in thousands of game situations and understanding why certain things are done. I think Brunell was brought in because Gibbs didn't feel that Ramsey could digest the offense, especially after being brought up in Spurrier's O strategies, which I think are very different from the "Gibbs way" of doing things. I think we will see Ramsey before the season is out possibly after Turkey day. Gibbs has said on numerous occasions that Ramsey is the team's future. Why would he want to jeopardize that future by throwing him out there without a full understanding of the offense?
Addressing the Brunell signing. I think the biggest mistake in that signing was the amount of money and tenure of the contract, but Brunell might not have settled for anything less. I don't know the particulars of the negotiations, but I know in general veteran players that have interest from more than one team always push for long multi-year contracts with lots of 0's because they want the $$$ and security of knowing they'll be working a couple years down the road. I think Gibbs was interested in the best veteran QB available and after consulting with the rest of the mgmt team, they came up with Brunell. It sucked they had to sign him long term and for ludicrous $$$, but there might not have been a better choice at the time. Regarding the QB situation. I think Brunell is horrible. I read the article on the skins website this morning about Brunell having confidence and being a competitor, blah-blah-blah. The quote from him where he says "we're not getting the job done, and that falls on the QB" I thought was a riot. It would seem that confidence and a grasp of reality do not go hand in hand with this guy! When will Brunell accept the fact that HE is not getting the job done? Maybe never. I think the whole purpose of that article was an attempt to quell the majority outcry from fans for a change at the position. I think we need to get Ramsey in there too. But when he's ready. Considering what he went through under Spurrier's tenure, he needs to be able to take the snap knowing that he'll get the job done and have the time and opportunity to do it. |
11-11-2004, 09:37 AM | #20 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,511
|
What I don't understand is the backlash at Brunell's quote, he says the offense isn't getting it done and it all falls on the QB.
Sounds like he's admitting that the offensive struggles start with him. What more does he need to say? I think Brunell is the most hated Skins QB ever, even if he turns it around I don't think he'll ever win everyone over. There will always be someone calling for his head with every incompletion or blasting him for quotes. I know he's struggling, I just don't understand why people are going after him so strongly. |
11-11-2004, 09:47 AM | #21 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaVale MD
Age: 62
Posts: 515
|
Matty, concerning the quote, I read it as him saying that the offense as a unit is not getting the job done and the blame is placed on the quarterback. It may be a semantic thing but it sounded like he was distributing the blame instead of accepting it fully. It could also be that I don't have enough coffee in me yet!:cheeky-sm I would think that the biggest reason that people are going after him so much is they expected more out of him than what they are seeing. People have come to equate big contracts with big performance and rightfully so. Everywhere we look in sports, the better players get the biggest salaries and I think overall, they perform to fans expectations. The ones that don't catch a ton of flak as a result.
|
11-11-2004, 10:06 AM | #22 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,511
|
Quote:
To me his quote says the offense is struggling and those struggles start with him. Brunell has been in the league for 11 years now, he knows his role as a QB and that role involves shouldering the blame. He's not a Jeff George type who has no understanding of what leadership means at the QB position. He's always been a standup guy in this league, I don't see why that would change now. |
|
11-11-2004, 12:19 PM | #23 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaVale MD
Age: 62
Posts: 515
|
OK, I can honestly say I haven't followed Brunell well enough to know his psychological make-up, but if you say he's not a Jeff George I'll defer to your knowledge of the guy. I DO remember Jeff George and what an immature prima donna he was and how he overvalued his ability. Hell, at least someone thought George was great, even if it was only himself
|
11-11-2004, 01:14 PM | #24 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Quote:
Don't forget Danny Boy Skins fan, haha. That makes two. |
|
11-11-2004, 01:20 PM | #25 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Quote:
Moreover, does anyone think he's gonna suddenly get good. I keep hoping he will, ready to bite my toungue and say Gibbs you were right, but its just tough for me, based on my humble observations, to imagine that happening. |
|
11-11-2004, 04:16 PM | #26 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 55
Posts: 907
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|