|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-27-2009, 11:20 AM | #16 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
They actually looked more aggressive to me. I think if a lot of these so-called "stars" were benched we'd have a better chance of winning.
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
Advertisements |
10-27-2009, 11:21 AM | #17 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
Also this is what Lewis 2nd or 3rd week dealing with this team so to score as many points as Zorn did in his first week as play caller is promising. We should have had 20 points and kicked that field goal instead of letting Rabach dry hump the football on 4th down.
|
10-27-2009, 11:21 AM | #18 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
Quote:
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
10-27-2009, 11:35 AM | #19 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
I was basically interested in seeing what affect his play calling was going to have on the overall flow of the game. For the most part it would seem all went over without many glitches. Play calling would apear to be an non issue, execution of the plays called is the real concern.
|
10-27-2009, 11:41 AM | #20 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
Playcalling wasn't an issue, just like alot of others have said the execution from JC and the Oline is awful. ARE can't be returning kicks any more. That ball hitting him in the face was laughable. I really don't mind this anymore, I find this team very funny.
__________________
Just win. |
10-27-2009, 11:42 AM | #21 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
Playcalling WAS a concern before though. We actually went for TDs and passed near the goal line...and scored. No more stretch plays on crucial downs, no more obvious playcalls. Thomas and Davis were involved. Yes, David was more involved due to Cooley's injury, but he was in the game and productive like never before. Also, using 2 halfbacks in the backfield at times gave us an added dimension and it worked fairly well considering we have no line. We also used the shotgun a lot more than under Zorn, something we were all asking for since the line can't block. It was very effective when Rabach was able to actually get the ball snapped into JC's hands. I was very pleased with the selection of plays and the lack of predictability.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
10-27-2009, 12:25 PM | #22 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
Quote:
|
|
10-27-2009, 12:36 PM | #23 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
Quote:
|
|
10-27-2009, 12:44 PM | #24 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
I thought that Sherm Lewis did a few different things but overall the change was not significant. I thought that the game showed that play calling was not at the center of our offensive woes.
Haynesworth is right. We lack fire and this is our biggest problem.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
10-27-2009, 12:45 PM | #25 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
Quote:
Even for the short period we had "primetime" here he couldn't get the job done either for te same reasons. |
|
10-27-2009, 12:53 PM | #26 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
Quote:
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
|
10-27-2009, 01:03 PM | #27 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 68
Posts: 868
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
The playcalling was fine. The execution sucked. When a team cannot execute the fundamentals of football like quarterback snap, catching a punt, blocking, tackling and pass coverage, it doesn't matter what play is called. There were people open on most of the plays called. Pass protection was the biggest problem and ball security was the second biggest problem.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
10-27-2009, 01:03 PM | #28 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
Quote:
o We moved the ball o He got Jason on the move with roll-outs o There was more motion and shifting o There were more formations **Lol, Someone should have told Lewis that Fred Davis is a suspect blocker The Most meaningful difference? o **We threw the ball in the RZ inside the 10 yardline and we scored!!** |
|
10-27-2009, 01:52 PM | #29 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
The effect was a 27-17 loss. That's all folks!
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
10-27-2009, 02:06 PM | #30 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Sherman Lewis, what was his effect
Quote:
|
|
|
|