Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Product of the denver system

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2004, 02:13 PM   #16
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by illdefined
man, one thing you can't say is that he isnt trying. as great as an athlete as he is, he is only 200 lbs!!! he's throwing it all on the line as Gibbs has asked of him, up the middle, into the LBs and Dline, but even Portis can't overcome physics.

ugh, i hate to say it, but i'd sooner question the playcalling at this point then Portis's heart. whats the lightest back Gibbs has ever used significantly anyway?
Joe Washington, but he wasen't used up the middle we used him on screen's, pitch's, and passes, he wasen't a gut you send up the middle very often, ricky ervin's was also a small guy, but he was very stocky for his size, I don't believe that Portis is not giving everything he has, he is, he just keep's hitting a wall, he's not that kind of back, granted the blocking could defiently be better, no doubt, but Portis is not an inside runner, the counter trey is a good play for Portis, but we haven't been able to get it going, Denver's blocking scheme is a cut back running attack, and that's what Portis need's, he need's to follow his block's down the line and then cut when the hole emerges, Portis's strength lies with his ability to cut, and explode through a hole, we can send him straight ahead, but not on a regular basis, we spent to much money on him, if we have to change the blocking scheme to make him productive again, then it's something that HAS to be done, but I am sure that won't happen until the coaches are sure it's the scheme, and not the player's still learning the scheme.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-04-2004, 02:50 PM   #17
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,462
Portis will be just fine in this system once they work out the kinks.

There's no need to overhaul the offense, the plays, etc. The players just need execute and everything will fall into place.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2004, 03:06 PM   #18
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
ugh but how long will it take? ok, looks like we've finally mastered the snap. Brunell has learned to throw it away instead of at defenders to pick..maybe next week we can master lining up in the right formations in time and not blow timeouts....

so FRUSTRATING
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2004, 05:26 PM   #19
SkinsRock
Impact Rookie
 
SkinsRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 55
Posts: 907
Quote:
Originally Posted by irish
He has been the bust of the year in the NFL so far.
:confused- Uhh...ok. 369 yards rushing in 4 games which translates to 1,476 in 16. Yeah, looks like a bust to me.

The fumbling problem does need to be resolved ASAP though.
SkinsRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.23738 seconds with 10 queries