Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Which Would You Rather Have?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-29-2008, 05:11 PM   #16
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Which Would You Rather Have?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
Which would you rather have for the 08' season? An offense that is ranked among the best in the league with a drop off in defense, or for the defense to continue being solid with the offense maintaining the same output as '07? Choose one option and tell me why.
Philosophically, it's more important to have offense. Teams with great offense will find themselves in every game, and win the ability to win more games than a team with a great defense can.

With that said, the Redskins need better personnel on defense to sustain it, while their offense just simply needs more time to grow.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-29-2008, 08:36 PM   #17
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Re: Which Would You Rather Have?

I'd take a top 5 defense because, although teams with good defenses dominate the regular season, teams with bad defenses tend to get knocked out early in the playoffs.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 08:55 PM   #18
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Which Would You Rather Have?

It's kind of a toss up with me. An elite offense will get you at least 9 or 10 wins per year and will most like get you in the playoffs each year. However, a good defense is going to make some big plays to get you through the playoffs. Example....Giants' defense in this season's playoffs. However, I believe the edge does go to the offense in today's NFL. An elite offense will put up plenty of points, but will also be able to eat up the clock.

In the end, you need both an elite offense and at least a top 10 or 15 defense in order to get you to the Super Bowl and to win it all. Of course, watch the Giants blow that theory clean out of the water this Sunday!
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 09:27 PM   #19
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: Which Would You Rather Have?

Quote:
Originally Posted by QBall View Post
I'd take a top 5 defense over top 5 offense anyday! Look at 06' when our defense was terrible we couldn't win a game or force a turnover at all. That really was a bad year for us.
How was '04 with our top 10 defense and #31 offense?

In '06, our offense was ranked in the 20's also. If you can't score, you don't win. It's quite simple really.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 09:48 PM   #20
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Which Would You Rather Have?

Drop in defense. My uncle is Earle Bruce the ex Ohio State football coach during the 80's. He always had very nice balanced powerful offenses with more of a bend no break type zone defense. They were top 5 usually in the Big Ten defensively yardage wise, but the team always had the best turnover ration in the Big Ten as the defense was rather adept at causing turnovers. My point is I rather have a high powered offense with an increase in yardage allowed, provided we can get our turnover ration more in the plus column.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 10:00 PM   #21
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,439
Re: Which Would You Rather Have?

I think you're better off with a shut-down D and a lousy O than the other way around. And I think it's far more likely to happen this year, too.

I don't think your team ends up very good in either scenario, so I'd rather take the one that's more enjoyable to watch. Just thinking back to 2006 when our defense was a seive, I could barely watch the team. I didn't even want our offense to score, I just wanted them to stay out on the field to keep our defense on the sidelines. But in 2004, when our D was dominant and our offense sucked, I had a great time watching each game.

Defensive games are exciting to me. Games that go 42-35 just feel like I'm watching Tecmo Super Bowl.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 10:23 PM   #22
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Which Would You Rather Have?

I'll take the defense. Reason being, we lost every game except one by 8 points or less. We blew 5 halftime leads. Our offense was inches away from being an 11 or 12 win team. Our defense was fantastic most of the year. If we attack just a little bit more (like we did after JC went down), we're in good shape. Plus it's hard to think we'll have to deal with even half the serious injuries we did this year.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 12:02 AM   #23
htownskinfan
JUST LIVIN
 
htownskinfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 63
Posts: 4,916
Re: Which Would You Rather Have?

Quote:
Originally Posted by QBall View Post
But what happens when that high octane offense meets a lock down defense?

Look at how the Raiders fell in Supebowl to Tampa. We need big D!
lets not forget about the skins loss to the raiders,highest scoring team ever up to the vikings who also lost to the falcons{cant remember how good the falcons def was} now the pats,highest scoring team ever,lets see how they do
Having said that,I'm all for the off,I'm sick of not scoring any points,its been years since we were good on off,probably sinnce Gibbs 1.0
Even if we were last in def so long as we were top 5 in off I would take it,at least the games would be exciting as hell and I'm used to seeing the games come down to the wire anyway
__________________
Make The Redskins Great Again
htownskinfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 12:05 AM   #24
htownskinfan
JUST LIVIN
 
htownskinfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 63
Posts: 4,916
Re: Which Would You Rather Have?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
How was '04 with our top 10 defense and #31 offense?

In '06, our offense was ranked in the 20's also. If you can't score, you don't win. It's quite simple really.
I just noticed your sig,thats hilarious
__________________
Make The Redskins Great Again
htownskinfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.51887 seconds with 10 queries