![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
Either one really.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
All I know is when he's on the field he busts his ass and goes 110 mph whether it's running or blocking. I have zero questions regarding his heart and I don't see what the big deal is if he takes himself out, Gibbs has let him do that from day one. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,420
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
However you slice that, means IMO he is overpaid. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
If Gibbs is ok with it, so am I. The results speak for themselves on the field. CP is on pace for close to 1200 yards and 12 TDs. And people are still finding ways to bash on him. I don't get it. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 45
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 45
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Agreed. And I'm perfectly fine with him "only" getting 1200 yards since the passing game is becoming more effective each week.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,420
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
He's not making the vet min. either and he's only averaging 2.7 yards per carry this year.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
I feel like a broken record with this. Anyone who watches Portis on the field, especially when he's not carrying the ball-so when he's laying out a block, running a route, or chasing down a defender after a turnover, has no reason at all to question his heart. None.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 937
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
With the two back system....portis has managed to play in every game this season.....much better than last year....I think things are working the way they are. Keep him fresh...cause when he is...he has all the tools.....betts will get better as the season progresses
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Do people just need something to complain about? Portis getting through the season healthy is a good thing and cutting back on his carries a bit is a good thing. If Portis has no future with this team beyond this season then run the hell out of him and damn the consequences. If you want to think longer term then it is much better for him to get 18 carries than to get 25-30. In Denver he never carried more than 290 times, in Washington he was carrying 350 a year until last season. Last year Betts proved he could carry the rock. This year he isn't getting the carries and maybe is pressing a bit when he is in there but he is still valuable and I think he has been running hard when he gets the chance from everything I've seen. If you go back and watch the Giants game at the end he slammed it in there hard, especially that fist carry. Last season everyone loved Betts, this offseason at least a few people questioned Portis' future with the team, how the world turns ... I guess I'll just wait until the next time the Skins lose and some people start calling for Joe Gibbs' head.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 68
Posts: 868
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
I think the two back system is working. Portis is staying healthy and is productive. Betts, in my view, still runs the counter runs better than Portis and is a more reliable receiver. Portis is the big play threat. Portis and Betts makes one of the best two back combinations in the NFL. Keep it going.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Like I said, I have no problem with the two back system. It's working fine. I'd just like to see Portis get about 5 to 10 more touches. Maybe not every game, just more often.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|