|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-19-2004, 07:30 AM | #16 |
^21^
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 1,630
|
I don't know how anyone can think the Gmen are making good decisions. I think it's quite foolish to give up what they did for Eli and letting Collins go. I know Collins didn't wanna be a back up, but I probably woulda kept Collins as the starter shit I wouldn't have been in this predicament if I was owner...
I would like to know more about the grievance that the Gmen organization filed against Coughlin and the Players Union...??? JoeCrisp or Matty, anyone?
__________________
^21^ |
Advertisements |
05-19-2004, 08:18 AM | #17 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Collins was expensive (and not even that great of a QB, in my book.) Collins also wanted to start, whereas the Giants wanted to put their first pick in to let him run that team from day 1. May as well start a new QB with a new coach.
I agree, Tiki fumbles way too much, but you could have a worse back. Ahman Green used to be a persistant fumbler, all it took was a single sweatband to keep it from happening. |
05-19-2004, 09:29 AM | #18 |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
|
As usual Daseal, you are just soooooooo wrong.
I understood what you meant about the OLine. My point is, regardless of their other offensive talent - which, other than Shockey, I think is moderate to good - their line stinks and, as we in Washington have known since Hog times, you are going nowhere w/out an OLine. The only thing they did to work on their biggest problem is sign a couple of Cleveland castoffs (of all the castoffs to sign - Cleveland's??) and draft Coughlin's son-in-law (who, to be fair, is supposed to be pretty good). While Eli may eventually turn out to be a hot QB, he ain't gonna be nothing in his rookie year. In addition, as I have continually asserted, I think this is a team with a huge psychological problem. Every year there has been some locker room divisiveness. It appears to me, Fassell kept it under control by making everybody "feel good" and not pushing to hard. Coughlin is the polar opposite of this approach - and, I believe, it is going to cause this team to tear apart. Fingers they will be a pointing - at the coach, at each other, at the fans. All this and a rookie QB too? The Giants and 49'ers will be fighting for the cellar. You see Daseal, the reason you don't get it is because this is all part of the right wing conspiracy to demoralize the Northern California and New York liberal blocs. Their teams are gonna suck soooooo bad, they won't want to leave their homes come November. |
05-19-2004, 09:48 AM | #19 | ||
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,501
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-19-2004, 11:52 AM | #20 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Memphis
Age: 49
Posts: 180
|
From what I understand is they made certein parts of mini camp mandatory and longer than allowed. I don't think they came out and say the practices were mandatory per se. The story I heard was is the coaches put up a sign saying a breakfast before practice was mandatory. Each team is only allowed so many mini camp days and so many full practice days. From what I heard this isn't Coughlin's first offense in this area.
|
05-19-2004, 12:09 PM | #21 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Quote:
There are only a few QB's in the league that have experience under Coughlin. Notably, we have the one with the most experience (Brunnell). Jaime Martin (who may still be with the Jets), Rob Johnson (Raiders?), Jay Fielder (Dolphins), Jonathon Quinn (Chiefs?), and David Garrard (still Jax) all played under Coughlin, and might have fit the bill. Interestingly, all except Garrard (I think) would have been available in free agency, and none were considered (or they refused any inquiries). What that says about Coughlin, or the Giants, or the players - who are noticably lacking in star power - I won't speculate.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
05-19-2004, 01:43 PM | #22 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 685
|
The G-men are in serious trouble. Coughlin sees this and that alone is why he has already ordained Manning the franchise QB. When he was sucking in J-ville and left Leftwich on the bench, he had nobody to blame but himself. Starting a rookie deflects all of the criticism he will be facing and puts it on the QB's shoulders. "You can't hold me accountable, I have to play a rookie QB!"
And drafting the father of his daughters baby (not son-in-law...) smacks of poor headwork and nepotism. How the heck can he ever cut the guy? Tiki Barber fumbles more than he scores, the o-line is horrible..... Can't wait to play 'em! |
05-19-2004, 01:48 PM | #23 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
The Giants are going to stink on wheat toast this year!
How about this for a clver move, however? They signed as a free agent Jared Lorenzen, the big QB out of Kentucky. That is probably a smokescreen because J-Load - as he has come to be known - showed up at the minicamp weighing 292 lbs. He played last year at 275. Actually, the secret deal the Giants have with J-Load is that he will be starting at OT this year... |
05-19-2004, 02:03 PM | #24 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: the port, PA
Age: 40
Posts: 692
|
I think the Giants have a solid Offense minus the line, but their D seems to be getting worse everytime I see their roster. Emmons is the only ok LB they have on their roster, and the D-line is nothing without 92 unless Hand proves he is not a has been which could help them. Also their DB's are good when healthy whenever that is. So overall they have an ok offense and a suspect D but they did get Eli, who can only do so much even if he turns out to be a stud (similiar to Peyton with no D in Indy his first few seasons). The worst thing of all for the Giants is not only are their best players starting to get on the old side they have no first round pick next year which will more than likely be top 10. Could be a long few years for the Giants.
|
05-19-2004, 02:08 PM | #25 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Quote:
In defense of the Giants, Chris Snee (my grand-baby's daddy) is a solid prospect, and among the best interior linemen in the draft this year. He wasn't a reach, but it will be awkward at the dinner table after he (inevitably) gets chewed out.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
05-19-2004, 04:41 PM | #26 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Clemente CA
Age: 51
Posts: 2,390
|
I sure hope not!!!
__________________
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. Benjamin Franklin |
05-19-2004, 06:00 PM | #27 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 473
|
Poor Eli will always be comparted to Payton, but Payton had something Eli does not. Peyton's first year was promising but the record sucked. As a result, they were in the position to draft Edgerrin James, and the rest is history. Since next years pick was traded for Eli, he will not have another young weapon to make his life easier.
|
05-20-2004, 02:40 AM | #28 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 685
|
BrudLee, thanks for the correction but I see you got my point. I really think Eli is in a bad situation and there is no relief. The fans of NYG are already pissed that their team quit last year and is complaining about working in the off-season (right or wrong). Who are they going to stary, the Bachelor? No way, and if he starts and loses then the fans will be screaming for heads. Eli is going to take the brunt of it and he ain't getting help in next years draft. Clevelands fans made Couch cry, imagine what NY fans are going to do to him. He's incredibly lucky he's not in Philly!
|
|
|