Pre Depth Chart Rankings

[Daseal]

That Guy beat me to he LaVar jokes =(

[GoSkins!]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

LOL is this the official no-brainer thread?

Must be. Notice how they didn't even try to spell Prioleau....

I guess we will just list him as Pierson or maybe PP!

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by DCsports

who says gee anyways?!?!?!

Who writes depth charts that only go three players deep anyways?!?!?!

Well gee, like we don't know who the starters are!

I said gee again! Gee, I sure hope I don't have to read another thread like this. Gee, what a waste of time this is. Gee. Gee whiz.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Originally Posted by ArtMonkDrillz

I disagree. Mortal Kombat is a very good game, but Donkey Kong is the best game of all time.

O'Doyle rules.

[Drift Reality]

There is one question mark on the depth chart: who is starting at weakside linebacker. That is literally the only question.

It is sort of a stupid question anyway considering the rotation of LBs means that the "starter" is sort of a superficial label.

[hooskins]

Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer

well i don't know... I mean we could talk about the LBs, Who is better Lloyd or ARE? I wonder if this thread will go much farther without talking about JC and Brunell and who should be number 1.

I honestly think Lloyd and ARE are about equal, bc they excell in different ways. Since we will be running 2-3+ wide most of the time, I really dont know if there will truly be a 2nd string reciever. I think Lloyd and ARE will rotate when we run two reciever sets, and have about equal playing time, maybe a little bit more with Lloyd.

Sorry guys, trying to bring this thread back down to earth lol.

[Hog1]

Because of his versatility, Defense's must HATE ARE

[mheisig]

Originally Posted by That Guy

QB:
ramsey
wuerful (sp?)
matthews

LB:
lavar arrington
Lavar arrington's second arm
Lavar's arrington's best friend
trotter
armistead

WR
westbrook
gardner
farris
jacobs
antonio brown

RB
trung
(do you really need anyone else?)

Hey! You stole my list! I thought I had that mofo locked up tight...

[Drift Reality]

Originally Posted by hooskins

I honestly think Lloyd and ARE are about equal, bc they excell in different ways. Since we will be running 2-3+ wide most of the time, I really dont know if there will truly be a 2nd string reciever. I think Lloyd and ARE will rotate when we run two reciever sets, and have about equal playing time, maybe a little bit more with Lloyd.

Sorry guys, trying to bring this thread back down to earth lol.

In a conventional two-back offense you basically have a slotback and a split-end (both referred to as wide receivers in popular nomenclature). The split-end lines up on the line of scrimmage whereas the slot-back lines up about 2-3 yards off the line, so he can go in motion. In many conventional sets, they will both position themselves close to the hashes - away from the offensive line but often, the slotback can will position himself directly adjacent to the offensive line.

Because of their positioning, the split-end normally will be asked to run more fly and post patterns while the slotback will run ins, outs, hooks - short to intermmediate patterns. Consequently, you normally want your split-end to be someone who is faster than quick (like Lloyd) and your slotback to be someone who is quicker than fast (like El). In an ideal world, you have someone like Moss, who has both.

My guess is that in a 2-receiver set, you have Cooley lined up at tight-end, Lloyd at split-end and Moss at slotback. If they go with a 3-receiver set, then El will come in for Cooley and play slotback and Moss will move up on the line.

But in most formations you need that classic receiver to play the split-end, which is one of the main reasons they brought in Lloyd.

[MonkFan4Life]

Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan

I said "gee" once. Once.

Hey the "once. ONCE" Is that a Johnny Dangerously quote ? If it is !!!

[724Skinsfan]

Originally Posted by MonkFan4Life

Hey the "once. ONCE" Is that a Johnny Dangerously quote ? If it is !!!

You got it!

[MonkFan4Life]

WHOO HOOOO !!!!

Welcome to "Your Testees,... and you. "

HAAAAAAAAAA HOLY SHIT !!!!!! THAT IS SUCH A BOOST ! I JUST BOUGHT THAT THE OTHER DAY FOR UNDER $10 AT CIRCUIT CITY ! THAT MOVIE IS SO UNDERRATED!!!!

MARONEY RULES !!!!!! YOU LOUSY CORKSUCKER! YOU FARGIN ICEHOLESS !!!

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by Drift Reality

In a conventional two-back offense you basically have a slotback and a split-end (both referred to as wide receivers in popular nomenclature). The split-end lines up on the line of scrimmage whereas the slot-back lines up about 2-3 yards off the line, so he can go in motion. In many conventional sets, they will both position themselves close to the hashes - away from the offensive line but often, the slotback can will position himself directly adjacent to the offensive line.

Because of their positioning, the split-end normally will be asked to run more fly and post patterns while the slotback will run ins, outs, hooks - short to intermmediate patterns. Consequently, you normally want your split-end to be someone who is faster than quick (like Lloyd) and your slotback to be someone who is quicker than fast (like El). In an ideal world, you have someone like Moss, who has both.

My guess is that in a 2-receiver set, you have Cooley lined up at tight-end, Lloyd at split-end and Moss at slotback. If they go with a 3-receiver set, then El will come in for Cooley and play slotback and Moss will move up on the line.

But in most formations you need that classic receiver to play the split-end, which is one of the main reasons they brought in Lloyd.

Have we heard who the official "fullback" is going to be? And is the H-back a feature in the Al Saunders offense?

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Have we heard who the official "fullback" is going to be? And is the H-back a feature in the Al Saunders offense?

mike sellers is the fullback and no, there's no h-back. Cooley will be a straight up TE, but i seriously doubt it'll affect his stats (though the extra offensive talent might cut into his totals a bit).

[BrudLee]

We are going to run so many formations (2wr, 2te, 1rb; 3wr, 1te, 1rb; etc.) that saying a guy like Randle-El (or Lloyd) isn't a starter is kind of misleading. Our third receiver will likely be in for more snaps than our fullback... on some days. Pay no attention to the offensive depth chart at the receiver position - it will only serve to confuse you.