|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-27-2006, 03:44 PM | #16 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern Virginia, Woodbridge
Age: 62
Posts: 2,507
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Matty wants to play a 98 year old aged sport hero.
Let's beat up Sammy! He can't defend himself! woohoo! Meh
__________________
Check out Mike Hedrick - The Next Food Network Star. Please Click and give me a Thumbs Up and Positive Comment. Thanks |
Advertisements |
04-27-2006, 03:48 PM | #17 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,511
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Who said anything about beating up Sammy...
Just giving my opinion of the modern era vs. the old-timers. I said he was a talented guy. Would he have faired the same in today's game? That's the issue we can agree to disagree on. But in the end it's basically a moot point. He's a legend of the game no doubt, I'm not denying that. |
04-27-2006, 03:57 PM | #18 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern Virginia, Woodbridge
Age: 62
Posts: 2,507
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
I'm just messing with ya man.
APRIL FOOLS! Oh this isn't April 1st either. lol peace
__________________
Check out Mike Hedrick - The Next Food Network Star. Please Click and give me a Thumbs Up and Positive Comment. Thanks |
04-27-2006, 04:12 PM | #19 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Everyone talks about the old timers playing in todays NFL but how would the modern player do back in the 50 or 60. They would have no one to come out in put a bandad on thier scratch. No face mask to protect those pretty faces. They may be faster, taller, heaver, but they are no where near as tough. It might not be such of a stroll in the park if they could go back in time. The old timers would take them out the night before the game and get them trashed so they were all hung over the next day. That would level the playing field some and then they would kick, hit, scrach, bite, spit (Taylor could play with the old guys) rack, etc.. until they just gave up.
|
04-27-2006, 04:16 PM | #20 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2006, 04:38 PM | #21 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,511
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Quote:
I don't think how much padding you're wearing makes you any less or more tough. If you're a tough guy, you're a tough guy. I'm sure there are plenty of modern era guys that could have played back then, and vice versa. Overall though, I think with the increased size, strength and speed of the players, the modern era teams would dominate the old-time teams. |
|
04-27-2006, 04:43 PM | #22 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
I don't know about the rest of you but I keep hitting Matty's site and I have yet to get a cookie
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
04-27-2006, 04:49 PM | #23 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
sorry firstdown,but football is a sport were size does matter.from a size and strength perspective,todays giants would destroy the stars of yesteryear.you have to judge players against the players from their own era.sammy baugh was a true hall of famer.but,in comparing eras,lets take the steel curtain.hall of famers all over this wonderful defense.but with a 215lbs mlb named lambert,what 300lbs lineman of today wouldnt love to be matched up against him,game after game?it would be no contest
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
04-27-2006, 04:57 PM | #24 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2006, 05:07 PM | #25 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,511
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2006, 05:14 PM | #26 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Quote:
How would Donovan McNabb be WITHOUT the obvious benefits of today's weight training. The guy is HUGE...but may be benefitting from his physique and conditioning more than raw talent, whereas the old-timers excelled only on their talent. Like you said, it's moot, but if we were going to compare old vs. new, you'd have to try to even out training/schedules/technology/etc. Probably too much thinking than it's worth. |
|
04-27-2006, 05:16 PM | #27 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Quote:
Sure there WERE 300-pound guys in the 1950s, but training didn't allow them to run 4.5 second '40's...or even run at all! |
|
04-27-2006, 05:25 PM | #28 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,511
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Quote:
My take is this, take today's great teams, line 'em up against the great teams from yesterday. Today's teams would crush the old teams. Simple as that. |
|
04-27-2006, 05:51 PM | #29 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern Virginia, Woodbridge
Age: 62
Posts: 2,507
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Take today's players and make them grow up and train in 1940 and you get 1940's players.
Take Sammy Baugh and give him today's diet and training and I'll stand his heart and body up against ANY modern players.
__________________
Check out Mike Hedrick - The Next Food Network Star. Please Click and give me a Thumbs Up and Positive Comment. Thanks |
04-27-2006, 06:05 PM | #30 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: No Love For Sammy Baugh
Quote:
|
|
|
|