![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Assuming Campbell is ready to go, who would you like to see starting opening day '06? | |||
| Campbell |
|
105 | 60.34% |
| Brunell |
|
69 | 39.66% |
| Voters: 174. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
Brunnel does a good job of managing the game but is incapable of taking the team to the next level. I say lets start developing the young quarterback and give him a shot.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 44
Posts: 262
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
Start with Brunell, finish with Campbell. When exactly Campbell comes in will be entirely up to Brunell's performance, but the over/under is 10 games. By then, I feel like Brunell will have enough nagging injuries to make the move to Campbell prudent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 48
Posts: 72
|
I voted for campbell because it said that if he's "ready to go". I think if Gibbs thinks he's ready then why not start the future now. He couldn't do much worse then 120yrds a game....and With saunders on bord, i think our offense wont need him to throw the ball to JUST Moss...Look what Saunders did with the WR in KC. And now he has Moss?????
__________________
World wide traveling SKINS FAN |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
Quote:
Just so everyone knows i will not be doing any celebrations for two weeks. I decided to have a period of mourning for the skins. so here is a smaller one |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 260
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
Brunell with short leash. As long as Campbell is coming along. Come to think of it...this is a STUPID thread, why do we do this EVERY year? Just for something to talk about?...What happens...happens!!! Al will do what he thinks is right with HIS system. I myself suspect alot will depend on preseason, much like this year. Who the hell knows! Go Skins, Go Gibbs, Go D!!!!
__________________
90% of the game is half mental-John Madden Pure unadulterated uncompromising ecstasy- Jack K.Cooke |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,814
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
I wouldn't be upset with either, but if he's ready I'd like to see Campbell playing. The difference in arm strength, somewhat similar accuracy, good mobility, and a huge frame which should help him break free of some sacks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
I am part of the anyone but Brunell crew, whoever that may include?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Age: 43
Posts: 232
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
I would LIKE to see Campbell come out of camp looking like a million bucks, and then we start him. I don't want him thrust out there without really being ready. This is just wishful thinking, but still.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,582
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
I say we go with Brunell until he either:
A. Gets injured, because we all know how he plays when he's injured B. Just generally sucks ass, or does not perform up to expectations. The reason is, because Campbell has only learned for a year. Give him a few extra games, or another year on the bench, if Brunell can consistently play at a high level. There is no reason to put such a young quarterback out there. In case you don't know who J.P. Losman is, he was a second year quarterback for the Bills this year. They let Bledsoe go because they thought Losman would be ready to go as well. Instead, they wound up with a horrible record and Losman didn't even start the full season because he sucked so bad. I could see the same thing happening to us if we started Campbell on opening day.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
There is no way Gibbs will turn a playoff contending team over to an unproven QB. MB will be the starter next year and if he gets another WR will do just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
Let's say, though, that the team contends and does the same next year under Brunell? How long do we live and die by him? I'm not even injecting my own opinion, I just want to know when people think we should turn it over to Campbell if we don't do it next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Springfield, Va
Posts: 28
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
Why is Patrick Ramsey not getting a chance? I know he's a dumb redneck, but he showed savvy with Spurrier, and we should work on him.. we should have Ramsey and Campbell play out practice to be number 2, and whoever shines through, thats who we should put the job of a long term answer on.
__________________
"I want to give George Steinbrenner fellatio!" - D. Snyder |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 99,913
|
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|