Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Assuming Campbell is ready to go, who would you like to see starting opening day '06?
Campbell 105 60.34%
Brunell 69 39.66%
Voters: 174. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2006, 11:30 AM   #1
hail_2_da_skins
Impact Rookie
 
hail_2_da_skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

Brunnel does a good job of managing the game but is incapable of taking the team to the next level. I say lets start developing the young quarterback and give him a shot.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS"
hail_2_da_skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 04:41 PM   #2
skindogger47
Special Teams
 
skindogger47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 44
Posts: 262
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

Start with Brunell, finish with Campbell. When exactly Campbell comes in will be entirely up to Brunell's performance, but the over/under is 10 games. By then, I feel like Brunell will have enough nagging injuries to make the move to Campbell prudent.
skindogger47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 02:48 AM   #3
j_j__l
Camp Scrub
 
j_j__l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 48
Posts: 72
Cool Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

I voted for campbell because it said that if he's "ready to go". I think if Gibbs thinks he's ready then why not start the future now. He couldn't do much worse then 120yrds a game....and With saunders on bord, i think our offense wont need him to throw the ball to JUST Moss...Look what Saunders did with the WR in KC. And now he has Moss?????
__________________
World wide traveling SKINS FAN
j_j__l is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 03:26 AM   #4
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by j_j__l
I voted for campbell because it said that if he's "ready to go". I think if Gibbs thinks he's ready then why not start the future now. He couldn't do much worse then 120yrds a game....and With saunders on bord, i think our offense wont need him to throw the ball to JUST Moss...Look what Saunders did with the WR in KC. And now he has Moss?????
welcome.

Just so everyone knows i will not be doing any celebrations for two weeks. I decided to have a period of mourning for the skins. so here is a smaller one


BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 11:46 PM   #5
44deisel44
Special Teams
 
44deisel44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 260
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

Brunell with short leash. As long as Campbell is coming along. Come to think of it...this is a STUPID thread, why do we do this EVERY year? Just for something to talk about?...What happens...happens!!! Al will do what he thinks is right with HIS system. I myself suspect alot will depend on preseason, much like this year. Who the hell knows! Go Skins, Go Gibbs, Go D!!!!
__________________
90% of the game is half mental-John Madden
Pure unadulterated uncompromising ecstasy- Jack K.Cooke
44deisel44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 12:55 PM   #6
skinsfanthru&thru
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,814
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

I wouldn't be upset with either, but if he's ready I'd like to see Campbell playing. The difference in arm strength, somewhat similar accuracy, good mobility, and a huge frame which should help him break free of some sacks.
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 01:36 PM   #7
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

I am part of the anyone but Brunell crew, whoever that may include?
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 01:37 PM   #8
WestCoastSkinsFan
Special Teams
 
WestCoastSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Age: 43
Posts: 232
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

I would LIKE to see Campbell come out of camp looking like a million bucks, and then we start him. I don't want him thrust out there without really being ready. This is just wishful thinking, but still.
WestCoastSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 01:41 PM   #9
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,582
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

I say we go with Brunell until he either:
A. Gets injured, because we all know how he plays when he's injured
B. Just generally sucks ass, or does not perform up to expectations.
The reason is, because Campbell has only learned for a year. Give him a few extra games, or another year on the bench, if Brunell can consistently play at a high level. There is no reason to put such a young quarterback out there. In case you don't know who J.P. Losman is, he was a second year quarterback for the Bills this year. They let Bledsoe go because they thought Losman would be ready to go as well. Instead, they wound up with a horrible record and Losman didn't even start the full season because he sucked so bad. I could see the same thing happening to us if we started Campbell on opening day.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 04:23 PM   #10
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
I say we go with Brunell until he either:
A. Gets injured, because we all know how he plays when he's injured
B. Just generally sucks ass, or does not perform up to expectations.
The reason is, because Campbell has only learned for a year. Give him a few extra games, or another year on the bench, if Brunell can consistently play at a high level. There is no reason to put such a young quarterback out there. In case you don't know who J.P. Losman is, he was a second year quarterback for the Bills this year. They let Bledsoe go because they thought Losman would be ready to go as well. Instead, they wound up with a horrible record and Losman didn't even start the full season because he sucked so bad. I could see the same thing happening to us if we started Campbell on opening day.
But it could be like the Bengals, who benched a solid vet in Kitna to get Palmer playing time in 2004. The teams' and Palmers' performance in 2005 showed that it was probably worth it.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 04:25 PM   #11
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

There is no way Gibbs will turn a playoff contending team over to an unproven QB. MB will be the starter next year and if he gets another WR will do just fine.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 04:29 PM   #12
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

Let's say, though, that the team contends and does the same next year under Brunell? How long do we live and die by him? I'm not even injecting my own opinion, I just want to know when people think we should turn it over to Campbell if we don't do it next year.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2006, 01:19 AM   #13
CooleyFan
Camp Scrub
 
CooleyFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Springfield, Va
Posts: 28
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

Why is Patrick Ramsey not getting a chance? I know he's a dumb redneck, but he showed savvy with Spurrier, and we should work on him.. we should have Ramsey and Campbell play out practice to be number 2, and whoever shines through, thats who we should put the job of a long term answer on.
__________________
"I want to give George Steinbrenner fellatio!" - D. Snyder
CooleyFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 04:38 PM   #14
onlydarksets
Playmaker
 
onlydarksets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish
There is no way Gibbs will turn a playoff contending team over to an unproven QB. MB will be the starter next year and if he gets another WR will do just fine.
Yeah, he didn't do that with Schroeder and Rypien
onlydarksets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 04:40 PM   #15
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 99,913
Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by onlydarksets
Yeah, he didn't do that with Schroeder and Rypien
Big difference though, Campbell has 1 year under his belt, Ryp and Schroeder were stashed on the Skins roster for alot longer than that before they saw action.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.82624 seconds with 11 queries