NFL To Give Fans Access to "All 22"

[budw38]

If only Steve Spurrier had " ALL 22 " !!!!!!

[GTripp0012]

I think this is a smart decision by the NFL. They were facing something of a credibility issue for trying to keep the game film in limited distribution. With that said, they opened this up for public availability a lot sooner than I was honestly expecting.

[30gut]

My fear is that the "all 22" can be easily abused or misunderstood when used improperly.

I hope that people understand that even with "all 22" there are things that we don't know which still limit the conclusions/assumptions that can be made about a given play.

Awhile back on a Titans forum I broke down some "all 22" of Jake Locker and it was crazy some of the conclusions people were making based on the plays we watched.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by htownskinfan

Are you rich? 69 bucks a game is not low cost to me,for the season yes.
It seems like its implying 69 a game

$69 a game would be absurd, especially when considering the Sunday Ticket is $199

[30gut]

69 is a great number and its a hellavu cheap price for what you get

the NFL's "all 22" package gives what imo is the crown jewel of the NFL ticket, condensed games, at less then half the cost

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by 30gut

My fear is that the "all 22" can be easily abused or misunderstood when used improperly.

I hope that people understand that even with "all 22" there are things that we don't know which still limit the conclusions/assumptions that can be made about a given play.

Awhile back on a Titans forum I broke down some "all 22" of Jake Locker and it was crazy some of the conclusions people were making based on the plays we watched.

People will make unwarranted assumptions/conclusions no matter what, all 22 or not, IMO.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by 30gut

My fear is that the "all 22" can be easily abused or misunderstood when used improperly.

I hope that people understand that even with "all 22" there are things that we don't know which still limit the conclusions/assumptions that can be made about a given play.

Awhile back on a Titans forum I broke down some "all 22" of Jake Locker and it was crazy some of the conclusions people were making based on the plays we watched.

Oh I see, so you just prance around from team to team forum...you forum whore!

Seriously though, out of curiosity how'd the forum get access to the "all 22"

[firstdown]

Is the package all 22 while doing a 69. That could be a lot of fun.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by firstdown

Is the package all 22 while doing a 69. That could be a lot of fun.

I tried to laugh, but something told me refusing to endorse this statement would be a wise move.

[SmootSmack]

The film that will launch a thousand questions and the sources of offseason stories - Grantland

[30gut]

Originally Posted by Lotus

People will make unwarranted assumptions/conclusions no matter what, all 22 or not, IMO.

But it opens the door wide open for loud and incorrect spurious claims that seem correct and when presented to a casual fan could be pawned off as true.

[30gut]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Oh I see, so you just prance around from team to team forum...you forum whore!

Seriously though, out of curiosity how'd the forum get access to the "all 22"

lol, yeah I guess I am kinda a football whore/nerd.
I am fan of football and therefore the NFL as a whole, I admittedly follow and root for some non-B&G players and am a member of a couple other teams forums.
But make no mistake I bleed burgandy and gold.

There was an OL from Washington Ben Ossai #79 who posted a bunch of games 2010 Huskie games on youtube (I assume with permission from their athletic department).
I believe they're still available but I'm at work and can't see youtube.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by 30gut

But it opens the door wide open for loud and incorrect spurious claims that seem correct and when presented to a casual fan could be pawned off as true.

I don't disagree with you.

But my understanding of human nature tells me that such is already happening. To me the all 22 will simply change what is talked about, not how people talk about it. IMO.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by 30gut

lol, yeah I guess I am kinda a football whore/nerd.
I am fan of football and therefore the NFL as a whole, I admittedly follow and root for some non-B&G players and am a member of a couple other teams forums.
But make no mistake I bleed burgandy and gold.

There was an OL from Washington Ben Ossai #79 who posted a bunch of games 2010 Huskie games on youtube (I assume with permission from their athletic department).
I believe they're still available but I'm at work and can't see youtube.

Oh it was Huskies games, not Titans games.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Lotus

I don't disagree with you.

But my understanding of human nature tells me that such is already happening. To me the all 22 will simply change what is talked about, not how people talk about it. IMO.

I hope that now people will finally realize how little information some armchair analysts actually have, and that those same analysts will be more forthcoming in what they have access to. No more misleading the reader, just be honest about what you see