Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2005, 09:54 PM   #16
Winskins
Special Teams
 
Winskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wheaton, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 282
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

Hey until I hear inks hit the paper I don't wanna get too down, but never the less a little unnerving. 6 years at $26 million isn't really all too unreasonable or anything. If you really think about what some other players are getting paid.

With a $6.5 million dollar bonus I would figure that the cap number for this year wouldn't be too unreasonable either, but maybe someone can tell me what kind of cap money that would take up this year...
__________________
The Skins will make the Cowboys their woman...and they're gonna enjoy it!
Winskins is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-02-2005, 09:56 PM   #17
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 45
Posts: 5,829
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cush
Bell and Pierce are the same age (a few months apart)
I stand corrected and feel like a jackass at the same time. Thank you for showing me the error in my ways. I am therefore awarded no points and may God have mercy on my soul.

In my defense though If we cant keep Pierce then I thing that we should draft a LB.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:01 PM   #18
wolfeskins
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

[QUOTE=angryssg]I stand corrected and feel like a jackass at the same time. Thank you for showing me the error in my ways. I am therefore awarded no points and may God have mercy on my soul.



at no time did anything you said make sense, we are all dumber now for having read it.
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:03 PM   #19
Winskins
Special Teams
 
Winskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wheaton, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 282
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

Nice one wolf, but no more watching Billy Madison for you
__________________
The Skins will make the Cowboys their woman...and they're gonna enjoy it!
Winskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:05 PM   #20
wolfeskins
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

oohh to touch the hiny.
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:06 PM   #21
PSUskinsfan11
Impact Rookie
 
PSUskinsfan11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: the port, PA
Age: 39
Posts: 692
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

If Pierce leaves without given us a shot at matching the deal fcuk him. He said that he wanted to be a redskin and he would give us a shot at matching so if he doesn't he isn't worth the time. Barrow would give us time to find a solid replacement plus Clinton Smith could be the next Pierce for all we know. Don't rule out Danny goin after Hartwell or Bell though.
PSUskinsfan11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:08 PM   #22
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 45
Posts: 5,829
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

[QUOTE=wolfeskins]
Quote:
Originally Posted by angryssg
I stand corrected and feel like a jackass at the same time. Thank you for showing me the error in my ways. I am therefore awarded no points and may God have mercy on my soul.



at no time did anything you said make sense, we are all dumber now for having read it.
Thanks, you have boosted my confidence and my self esteem.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:10 PM   #23
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

Quote:
Originally Posted by smootsmack
isn't Pierce unrestricted? Do the Redskins even have the option to match?
Yeah he's unrestricted, but he said recently that he would give the Skins a chance to match any offers. We'll see if he holds true to that, or maybe more importantly, will the Skins consider matching if they are indeed given that chance?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:10 PM   #24
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 44
Posts: 10,069
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

Skins should match. This is chump change money and he is worth it. I bet the Giant contract is back loaded. The real question is how good will he be? In two to three years he might command 15+ million signing bonus.
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:10 PM   #25
e16bball
Special Teams
 
e16bball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 163
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

As a theoretical question, assuming the money is essentially the same, would you rather have Rolle and Pierce or Smoot and Hartwell?
e16bball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:10 PM   #26
cpayne5
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

I think Pierce will give the Skins a chance to match. He has shown loyalty to the club in the past, such as playing for a less lucrative deal than what other teams were offering last year.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:14 PM   #27
joecrisp
The Starter
 
joecrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,501
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

Could be that Pierce has already given the Skins the opportunity to match, and they decided it didn't fit their salary cap projections for the next few years. I doubt Pierce would totally forsake Williams, not to mention Snyder's checkbook. Barrow's supposedly going to be ready to practice during the offseason camps, and they've re-signed their young backups, so maybe throwing a lot of money at Pierce doesn't make sense, given those factors.
joecrisp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:14 PM   #28
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 45
Posts: 5,829
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

Quote:
Originally Posted by e16bball
As a theoretical question, assuming the money is essentially the same, would you rather have Rolle and Pierce or Smoot and Hartwell?
Theoretically I would rather have pierce and smoot, but I would rather let go of pierce than smoot
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:15 PM   #29
skins009
Impact Rookie
 
skins009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

I saw we let Pierce go. He is a good player, but he can be replace. Part of his success was because of the system. Barrow should be able to replace him if he's healthy. I think we MUST resign Smoot. He is a rising star who really effects what GW can do on defense. Plus i think we can draft a good young MLB in the third round and have in ready to play in one year.
skins009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 10:17 PM   #30
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 44
Posts: 10,069
Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone

Quote:
Originally Posted by e16bball
As a theoretical question, assuming the money is essentially the same, would you rather have Rolle and Pierce or Smoot and Hartwell?
Continuity is always a better option. Getting up to speed takes time. You can't just throw someone in and expect them to perform from the get go. I'd rather keep Pierce and Smoot.
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.14375 seconds with 10 queries