|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
10-28-2023, 07:43 PM | #1 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,009
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
Quote:
Agreed.....
__________________
Touchdown Washington Redskins!!! |
|
10-27-2023, 08:29 AM | #2 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,537
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
Forbes, Martin, Dotson, Mathis, Davis, Cosmi, Young. These are the first two rounds of Ron's tenure. First round should be a legitimate starter week 1 in a well ran FO. You should be able to hit water falling out of a boat. Cosmi and Young are the only ones I would say Ron got right. Every other player we could've had on the team with a lower pick based on draft evaluation going in. You could have better success going straight chalk
__________________
Who does number 2 work for? |
10-28-2023, 07:53 PM | #3 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,009
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
Quote:
Good evaluation......
__________________
Touchdown Washington Redskins!!! |
|
10-27-2023, 09:07 AM | #4 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,471
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
LOTS of examples of 1st and 2nd round picks not contributing at a high level all across the league. Outside the top 5-10 picks (which still aren't a guarantee) the draft is basically a crap shoot in every round.
Not defending Ron and his staff, they haven't done well. But it's easy to look back now and pick apart decisions with hindsight. You can do that with literally every team. I would say Ron is not a good evaluator of talent. However, I would also say it's not really his job. Sure, he is involved. He decides what the team needs, probably watches some film and makes the final call. My guess is his player personnel department isn't putting bad film in front of him, right? Anyway, I'm with Hoglips, not sure why this warrants a separate thread. This is being discussed ad nauseam in multiple threads and he's on borrowed time anyway - won't be making anymore of these decisions. Moving along... |
10-27-2023, 10:18 AM | #5 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,537
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
I think the simple solution is to have us evaluate and draft the talent.
__________________
Who does number 2 work for? |
10-27-2023, 11:45 AM | #6 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 41
Posts: 19,478
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
Problem solved. Close thread.
__________________
Turkish: What's happening with them sausages, Charlie? Sausage Charlie: Five minutes, Turkish. Turkish: It was two minutes five minutes ago. |
10-29-2023, 09:58 AM | #7 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,202
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
Quote:
It would be amazing and a train wreck and a fascinating experiment all at once. And the results couldn't be worse than what our FO has done for the last 20+ years! To make it even more interesting: qualify who can vote by having a gm prequal quiz and rank their votes according to their prequal score. |
|
10-27-2023, 10:42 AM | #8 |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,063
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
The proof is in the pudding. Four years in and we have a worse oline, worse lb’s, our last two first round picks contribute zilch. Wentz . Dude is a train wreck as a talent evaluator.
And yes, B-More we could have done a better job. I promise id have at least one good lineman. |
10-27-2023, 01:12 PM | #9 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,537
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
Was going to put in week 8 but it fits here:
From Mark Bullock: Pretty damning indictment on their offseason that they’re benching one of their key free agent signings and it isn’t for their third-round pick And yes, Stromberg could be playing LG. I also understand wanting a vet at C to help a young QB with the calls. But the process is all over the place. Spent FA $ and a 3rd-rounder on 2 C’s, neither are playing C by week 8. https://twitter.com/MarkBullockNFL/s...re-development
__________________
Who does number 2 work for? |
10-27-2023, 01:17 PM | #10 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 41
Posts: 19,478
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
Rivera has completely fucked this team up in every single role he has filled. He's like George Constanza, he needs to start going w/ the opposite.
__________________
Turkish: What's happening with them sausages, Charlie? Sausage Charlie: Five minutes, Turkish. Turkish: It was two minutes five minutes ago. |
10-28-2023, 09:56 PM | #11 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,258
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
The sooner this bum is gone, the faster we can start to rebuild.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
10-28-2023, 10:01 PM | #12 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 38
Posts: 5,413
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
The Martin pick was fucking egregious
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
|
10-29-2023, 06:28 AM | #13 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,317
|
Re: Ron Rivera's qualifications for being a evaluator of talent
|
|
|