11-19-2007, 12:01 PM | #16 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
Yep. The sky is not falling, the world is not ending, the band is not breaking up.
In 2009 we could see a major shakeup, though I'll hold final judgment on that until I see what the Skins actually do in 2008. Any renegotiations with Jason Campbell and/or Sean Taylor could obviously impact the numbers as well.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
Advertisements |
11-19-2007, 12:03 PM | #17 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
General note, I'm happy to take questions on this stuff, as always.
But if you want to wait until the offseason, I'd certainly understand. After all, we've got a playoff race to win!
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
11-19-2007, 12:03 PM | #18 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
Quote:
|
|
11-19-2007, 12:04 PM | #19 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
Except we actually have most of our draft picks..
Typical annual media 'Redskins are in pending cap hell' blurb.. Remember how before the labor agreement we were going to have to field like 33 rookies or something foolish like that? While silly things like consistently winning or making the playoffs in consecutive years seem to escape the Redskins braintrust, circumventing the salary cap is the one thing that we do better than anyone else in the NFL.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
11-19-2007, 12:04 PM | #20 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,251
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
Quote:
Peter King is a tool. I'll never ever forget when Old Ball Coach got hired and King said Danny Weurfel (sp?) was going to be the next Kurt Warner. I don't believe anything that comes out of his mouth. |
|
11-19-2007, 12:05 PM | #21 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
Good posts. I would like to think that our Capogists at Redskins Park already know this and have a good plan to work our way thru.
|
11-19-2007, 12:06 PM | #22 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
agreed...there really isn't anything wrong with the Snyder system AT FACE VALUE (not advocating for it, just making a point)...you can continue to pay a lot of money (hopefully wiser moving forward), if you can get players to defer payment this year for guaranteed future payments. Synder can continue this scheme into perpetuity so long as he owns the team- we get into trouble when we get a regime/strategy change (which doesn't seem likely)...
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper. - Churchill |
11-19-2007, 12:08 PM | #23 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
You bet they do, they've been executing this exact plan for four years now. The growth in the salary cap each year mitigates the consequences of pushing cap hits into the future.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
11-19-2007, 12:10 PM | #24 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
Here's a stupid question. What if we were to pull a NY Yankees and just give the finger to the Salary Cap? Is there a luxury tax? Are you not allowed to sign any other players until you're under the cap? Would Goodell just come in and shoot Danny?
__________________
"All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit." Thomas Paine |
11-19-2007, 12:12 PM | #25 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
Quote:
That's why it's so hard to find any writers out there who actually understand the cap. If any of them make any comments on the Skins cap situation, it's always wise to take it with a grain of salt. Hit up the Warpath's cap page, because CC has all the info right there. I'll be here to analyze it and such. La Canfora usually has valid information, but that's because he's referencing someone (an accountant) who keeps the numbers very tightly. If you see La Canfora starting to muse about what the Skins could do, take it with a grain. If you see him stating what the numbers look like, then that piece is reliable.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
11-19-2007, 12:14 PM | #26 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
Quote:
In baseball, the consequences for being over the cap is a luxury tax. If you want to be over the cap, you just have to pony up the bucks in taxes. Same in the NBA. But in the NFL, teams are required to stay under the cap. It's a hard cap. I've never seen a team violate this, so I'm not sure what the consequences are, but I believe they are severe, like forfeiting lots of draft picks.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
11-19-2007, 12:15 PM | #27 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
Springs is pretty much a goner too, IMO. Todd Wade has a high cap number for a backup, although he's likely safe one more year.
Springs saves a million or so this year, but more importantly, takes him off the books for the future. The biggest deal this year is that we simply won't have the money to go out next season and make a splash in free agency. No longer will we be able to outbid other teams for talent. However, we should have no issue keeping the contributors around for the foreseeable future. The only way we can improve this team though is with the development of young talent.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
11-19-2007, 12:23 PM | #28 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,251
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
Quote:
|
|
11-19-2007, 12:26 PM | #29 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
If you haven't read my thread from March, I feel that the information I put in it is still very relevant to the Skins current situation:
http://www.redskinswarpath.com/locke...situation.html The Redskins, however, have definitely made moves for the future since then designed to getting dead cap guys off our books for next season. You can bet your bottom dollar that Springs and Lloyd will follow to get their cap numbers off the books for 2009 and 2010. My $20 million figure is pretty much in line with King's figure. Since then, Cooley has been resigned. My main point from that post still remains: getting respected veteran FA help from other teams is not plausible. Signings like Randall Godfrey, who was a consistent contributor for a bunch of teams before coming here, are still plausible. But bringing in guys like London Fletcher and Fred Smoot simply won't be happening this offseason. Just not enough cap dollars available to lure them here. Plus, getting rid of Lloyd is so much more important.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
11-19-2007, 12:28 PM | #30 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King on The Skins - Future Cap Trouble
Quote:
The big question going into next year is can the development of those select young guys offset or even exceed the decline of the steady vets on this team? Based on position value, such as Quarterback, I would argue that yes, they will offset them.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|