|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-23-2006, 10:20 PM | #41 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 20
|
WR numbers who could be our #2
1. Antonio Bryant = 69rec, 1009yds, 4td's
2.Randle El = 35rec, 558yds, 1td 3.Corey Bradford = 45rec, 697yds, 6tds 4. David Givens = 59rec, 738yds, 2tds 5. Ike Hillard = 35rec, 282yds, 1td 6. K.McCardell = 70rec, 917yds, 9tds 7. J.Jurevicius = 55rec, 694yds, 10tds 8. R.Caldwell = 28rec, 352yds 1td 9. = R.Wayne = 83rec, 1055yds, 5td 10. E.Moulds = 81rec, 816yds, 4tds This isn't the order I want them to be our #2. Except for Moulds I just the UFA players. What about trading Ramsey to the cards for Bryant Johnson. If dallas gets T.O. and cuts K.Johnson, Should we sign him. |
Advertisements |
01-23-2006, 10:31 PM | #42 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 36
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
Quote:
As for Randle El I think he is the best choice to fit our style of offense how can you say he hasn't proved that he can play at an NFL level 4 years 162recs, 2,012yds,7tds granted they arent the best numbers but he has proven that he can be a #2 receiver and remember this is his first real year with significant playing time do to Plaxico Burress being in Pittsburgh. Patten is a good receiver but just not a #2 receiver he was always a #3 receiver with New England , I think he fits us better as a #3 and he is getting old, Randle El has only been in the leauge 4 yrs and I think he can do a great job for us. |
|
01-23-2006, 10:38 PM | #43 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,762
|
Re: WR numbers who could be our #2
Quote:
|
|
01-23-2006, 10:49 PM | #44 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I agree on Key. He is garbage. I would like to see the 'boys drop him but I don't want to see T.O. with the star.
|
01-24-2006, 03:47 AM | #45 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I dont want him.......enough with the small ball
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........ |
01-24-2006, 03:49 AM | #46 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 102
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I don't see how the Steelers are going to let Randel El go, so we'll have to draft someone and have a vet compete with D. Patten.
|
01-24-2006, 07:36 AM | #47 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
A. Bryant - 6'2" - 188lbs. 4yrs exp. Last year where he got to be the #1 guy he had over 1,000 yards and 15 catches of 20+yards. D. Givens - 6'0" - 212lbs. 4yrs exp. K. Robinson - 6'1" - 205lbs. 5yrs exp. Also, could work on our special teams squads. K. Washington - 6'3" - 216lbs. 3yrs exp. Any one of these guys I would like to see play for us. Also, if you look, they are all young meaning that they wont be quick fixes, they will be here long term. And they are big WR size wise to help move the chains and be a target in the red zone.
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor |
|
01-24-2006, 09:32 AM | #48 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: WR numbers who could be our #2
Quote:
I wouldn't count on Arizona letting any of those guys go. |
|
01-25-2006, 09:42 AM | #49 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I'd only want AR-el if the following aren't available:
wayne (expensive and franchised, so not happening :/ ) curtis (RFA) KR draft S moss givens there are #2s with 800-1000 yards, so settling for someone that's a 600 yard WR just cause he's fast and can run a trick play is silly. I'd bring in 2-3 WRs though. Either curtis or KR, then on top of that try to draft a WR if and only if the right player is available and bring in a couple lowball guys with upside or old established guys (keenan, reche, etc). That way you could have 2 good WRs outside moss and depth that's good for more than 1 catch a game total. |
01-25-2006, 09:45 AM | #50 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
didn't consider K washington or C Bradford... the texans J gaffney might be a good pickup too. I think curtis if possible is still the best option, and KR is a good pic too as long as you have a backup plan.
|
01-25-2006, 10:49 AM | #51 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Glen Allen Va
Posts: 35
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
yeah i say so but the steelers are gonna give him a deal because he is good at throwing at catching
|
01-26-2006, 12:46 PM | #52 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Bears are apparently interested in Randle-El, per the Chicago Tribune.
"Talk around this year's Senior Bowl practice week is that the Bears' first priority will be Pittsburgh wide receiver and premier returner Antwaan Randle El when free agency begins in March. Randle El, from Thornton High School in Harvey by way of Indiana University, has averaged 40 catches for 12.4 yards and 42 punt returns for 9.5 yards during his four seasons with the Steelers. Randle El also would give the Bears a third-string quarterback on game days without using the active roster spot. His play in the Steelers' playoff run will drive up the price, but the Bears are in excellent salary-cap shape and have not shied from making decisive, big-money moves the last three off-seasons."
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
01-26-2006, 01:55 PM | #53 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
after watching the seniors practice,maybe s moss might be the way to go.said to have an excellent week of practice.maybe a hard worker like his brother
|
01-26-2006, 03:30 PM | #54 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
If this is true about the Bears, we can kiss Randle El goodbye. |
|
01-26-2006, 03:50 PM | #55 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
We need reggie wayne, T.O., randle-el, or 6'0''+ receiver to be a solid 3rd down, blocking and can go over the middle wide out, and put patten in the slot on 2nd and 3rd, and long down situations. We need a hard hitting, cover DB either SS or CB, and an backup O-line. Who is out there FA and or draft?
|
01-26-2006, 03:52 PM | #56 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I gotta' say. The Bears are making some sound decisions personnel-wise.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
01-26-2006, 04:51 PM | #57 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
It's not very often, salary cap or not, that Dan Snyder lets someone leave the city without signing a deal. If Dan gets it in his head that he wants Randle El, he will make it work. Remember, between Gibbs & Danny, we've got Jesus and Satan on our side.
|
01-26-2006, 05:02 PM | #58 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
too much hype for a 600yd #2. there's better out there for less.
|
01-26-2006, 09:49 PM | #59 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
01-31-2006, 11:22 AM | #60 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland
Age: 57
Posts: 42
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Check the links for the following receivers:
Reggie Wayne http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/235256 Antwaan Randle El http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/302217 Eric Moulds http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/1196 Kevin Curtis http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/395944 As a #2 Receiver, I'd want them in this order: Wayne, Moulds, Randle El, Curtis. As a #3/KR, I'd want: Curtis, Randle El Everyone is talking about Randle El throwing option passes, but how many of those are the Redskins likely to run??? Maybe 4 in an entire season? I'll take the best receiver of the bunch to take the pressure off of Moss and then worry about gadget plays and return yards. |
01-31-2006, 01:35 PM | #61 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
wayne was franchised so he is out of the question
|
01-31-2006, 01:52 PM | #62 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I just dont see it as a priority to go and spend money on a big name guy. We have other needs that need to be addressed and spending big money on one guy just doesn't seem to fit. We need depth at o-line and d-line. We need secondary depth, corner and safety. Maybe some depth at TE, although I believe Cooley will play alot more w/ suanders calling the plays. We are going to have to sign a QB also because Ramsey is not going to be here. I would much rather sign quality players at those positions, than sign one big name guy and a bunch of stop gaps or roster fillers. I think the Redskins are spending the money where they need to, offensive coaching. Patten has been, typically through his career, a productive #2 guy. I believe with saunders opening things up and another year under his belt, Patten will be productive. You can give up on a guy because of 1 bad year(Brunell?) Also we have draft picks, plus what ever we get for Ramsey that could be used on a WR that could be productive as a #3 or if we are lucky #2. Plus I believe Cooley will be alot more involved, much like Gonzales was in KC, he would have about 100 catches each year. It sounds nice to say Reggie Wayne, Randel el, Robinson is a Redskin, but I just think the quality of players signed through out the Roster is more important than the superstar lable of one player.
|
01-31-2006, 01:56 PM | #63 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
guys like curtis or robinson won't be big money like wayne or moulds or even r-el (who's overhyped). |
|
01-31-2006, 02:18 PM | #64 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
01-31-2006, 02:42 PM | #65 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Koren Robinson had 22 catches for 347 yards and 1 TD. Hardly a career year, I think he's still damaged goods to the point where he's not going to be able to name his own price and command #1 WR type money.
|
01-31-2006, 04:59 PM | #66 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
01-31-2006, 05:59 PM | #67 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 61
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
i think moulds would be a perfect fit...he has size and speed, with him we have santana, moulds and patton...what a tough match-up for any secondary. i like randel-el....but i think he will stay in pittsburgh.
|
01-31-2006, 08:28 PM | #68 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
01-31-2006, 11:40 PM | #69 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I think people say he had a great year because, considering his past and the type of off-field problems the Vikings had this year, he was Mr. Reliable. He didn't wow you with his numbers but he showed up, played hard, and caused no problems.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
01-31-2006, 11:55 PM | #70 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
let the bears have him. they already have a possession receiver in muhammed. randle el is a younger version of patten. he is a fine player but he is smallish and we need size at at least 1 wideout. |
|
01-31-2006, 11:57 PM | #71 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
01-31-2006, 11:59 PM | #72 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2006, 12:01 AM | #73 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2006, 12:03 AM | #74 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2006, 12:06 AM | #75 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
if he expects that he will sit for a long time. there will have to be safeguards for any team signing him because of the possibility of relapse.. still he has a fine upside and is young. he needs to go to the right team for certain. given how tight the skins are becoming he will need to pass muster from the vets. if he does, look for the skins to make a strong push for him |
|
02-01-2006, 02:37 AM | #76 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 47
Posts: 72
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
__________________
World wide traveling SKINS FAN |
|
02-01-2006, 04:21 AM | #77 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2006, 08:02 AM | #78 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 47
Posts: 72
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
WOW, i just looked up JJ's age (32)...my bad, I didn't realize how old he was...NEVER MIND on him as our #3/2 WR, inless he's cheap and only wants a 2 year deal....
__________________
World wide traveling SKINS FAN |
02-01-2006, 08:05 AM | #79 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 47
Posts: 72
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Waybe if K. Robinson passes GIbb's personnel eval test and at the age of only 26, he might be a GOOD/SOLID pick up for #2/3 WR and KR (26yr avg.)...but I would break the bank on him and i would have option years to make sure his Character stays on par with what we consider as a Redskin.
__________________
World wide traveling SKINS FAN |
02-01-2006, 08:53 AM | #80 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 59
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Looking at the way Gibbs has operated in the past and contrast that with the initial performance of Snyder, I have to put Randle El in the category of a HIGH PROFILE free agent which Gibbs avoids. Joe looks for capable performers who are unappreciated by their present teams, viz Moss, and discards those on the Skins who have not improved to expectations, viz Gardner. Finding a WR in the draft, especially considering we have no first round pick, that can have an immediate impact in his first year in the NFL, will be very difficult to do. I anticipate Gibbs and Saunders will go "gold mining" again this year and come up with a nugget that no one else recognized.
|
|
|