Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Brunell Starting

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2005, 01:38 AM   #181
skinsfan0201
Special Teams
 
skinsfan0201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 234
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by STPainmaker
Great post.
Gannon, at the very least was still in the early part of his career, and with the possibility of greatness, while Brunell is essentially supposed to be the teacher of the tricks of the trade since we all know he doen't have much left in the tank and injury prone.
skinsfan0201 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-14-2005, 01:41 AM   #182
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by canthetuna
The difference is the age. As I posted, Brunell offers no long term solution to solidify the position. Gannon had troubles when he was young, and often times they work out. When someone gets to the end of their career and their talent and physical attributes begin to fail them, and they don't realize it, jerry rice for instance, and they can't let go, people still install faith in them and carry them through a couple of lousy years and call hindsight 20/20 when they don't produce and leave you scratching your head and smelling your finger.
A fair argument. I just don't see the Trent Green scenario as being the same. I wish we kept him but we just couldn't realistically. And I don't think people can say we drove Gannon out of town. He didn't show anything here. I mean people can say it, they have already. I just disagree
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 01:43 AM   #183
EternalEnigma21
Assistant Regional Mod
 
EternalEnigma21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 44
Posts: 2,958
Re: Brunell Starting

Exactly... and if he had been 35 at the time he would've never gotten the chance.
EternalEnigma21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 01:43 AM   #184
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan0201
Gannon, at the very least was still in the early part of his career, and with the possibility of greatness, while Brunell is essentially supposed to be the teacher of the tricks of the trade since we all know he doen't have much left in the tank and injury prone.
Tim Hasselbeck is in an even earlier part of his career. Greatness could be bestowed upon him in 2012. Should we have held onto him?

How about Tony Banks?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 01:45 AM   #185
EternalEnigma21
Assistant Regional Mod
 
EternalEnigma21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 44
Posts: 2,958
Re: Brunell Starting

Hell why dont we go get Kordell Stewart. He was decent once and he's over the hill now...
EternalEnigma21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 01:47 AM   #186
skinsfan0201
Special Teams
 
skinsfan0201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 234
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS
Tim Hasselbeck is in an even earlier part of his career. Greatness could be bestowed upon him in 2012. Should we have held onto him?

How about Tony Banks?
Hasselback does not possess the physical tools of any of the quarterbacks mentioned previously.

Speaking of feelings, when the physical tools are not there and you are not in the league of Joe Montana in reading the field and knowing the opponents like the back of your hand you will probably have problems being successful in the NFL.
skinsfan0201 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 01:57 AM   #187
STPainmaker
Impact Rookie
 
STPainmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 524
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan0201
Hasselback does not possess the physical tools of any of the quarterbacks mentioned previously.

Speaking of feelings, when the physical tools are not there and you are not in the league of Joe Montana in reading the field and knowing the opponents like the back of your hand you will probably have problems being successful in the NFL.
I respect your point, but I think simply that Gannon and Green were with us when either we couldn't keep them or we saw no reason to keep them. If not the front offices that made these decisions were several regimes ago anyway, we can only hope to minimize letting good players go.
__________________
REDSKINS FOR LIFE BEEETCH!!!!
STPainmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 02:00 AM   #188
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan0201
Speaking of feelings, when the physical tools are not there and you are not in the league of Joe Montana in reading the field and knowing the opponents like the back of your hand you will probably have problems being successful in the NFL.
What do you mean "speaking of feelings"?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 02:05 AM   #189
skinsfan0201
Special Teams
 
skinsfan0201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 234
Re: Brunell Starting

Speaking of feelings, I think that the Redskins knew that Hassleback more than likely did not have what it takes to be a starter in the NFL anytime soon.
skinsfan0201 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 02:32 AM   #190
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by canthetuna
Scott Brunell (lol) has not shown me anything more than ramsey has. He played decent against some second stringers in the preseason. I'm all for starting him when we have a second string team on the schedule, but until that happens I think Brunell is not the answer. He was basically handed the job last year and even before the hammy pull he sucked. The injury was an excuse. He sucked in the QB challenge before camp; he sucked in camp; he sucked in preseason; he sucked in the regular season. I don't get how people are giving a 35 year old veteran who had the worst stats in the league last year every excuse for playing terribly, but ousting a young guy who has been shit on his entire career.

The main reason I don't want to see brunell starting, though, is his age. At 35 he may be able to play still, but for how long? We're gonna have to go throught this same crap in a couple of years and I as a skins fan am sick of having a QB contraversey every year. Thats the one thing I think I want more than anything now that we have a little stability in the coaching ranks, is a steady option at QB. Not even a superstar, but just someone who wont go in and blow games. I think the high turnover rate of QBs in our franchise is a direct result of itself, (meaning every QB is so concerned about keeping a job here that it affects their play and they lose it [trent green, brad johnson, tony banks, gus ferrotte, etc]) and sometimes a team will stick it out with a promising young talent throught a tought year and build around him and the position will stabilize itself.
good to see i'm not the only one thinking this. even if Brunell magically got younger and better over this offseason what happens next season? back to the drawing board. maybe people will actually read through and understand the argument if its not just from me.

funny how a couple preseason games can make veteran Warpathers do complete 180s. talk about short sighted.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 02:50 AM   #191
Skinfomaniac
Camp Scrub
 
Skinfomaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12
Re: Brunell Starting

BLAH BLAH BLAH !!!!
we seem to forget one man does not make a team, Gentelmen. (and i use that term loosely!!) Coach Gibbs is searching just like the rest of us for a answer and until they come together as a unit it will continue to Falter!! think back to Ryp and that superbowl team and tell me they didnt work as a unit, its time for all to step up and want to be The Washington Redskins!!! one of the best franchises, led by one of the best Coaches to ever coach the game!!!The right man will step up and lead us to the promise land. Whether it,s Brunell, or Ramsey, or Campbell or some other QB This is what coach means by CORE REDSKINS in the mean time we must continue to be the Greatest Fans In the NFL and stand by our Team and our Coach !!!
NUFF SAID
Hail to the Redskins
Skinfomaniac
Skinfomaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 07:59 AM   #192
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinfomaniac
BLAH BLAH BLAH !!!!
we seem to forget one man does not make a team, Gentelmen. (and i use that term loosely!!) Coach Gibbs is searching just like the rest of us for a answer and until they come together as a unit it will continue to Falter!! think back to Ryp and that superbowl team and tell me they didnt work as a unit, its time for all to step up and want to be The Washington Redskins!!! one of the best franchises, led by one of the best Coaches to ever coach the game!!!The right man will step up and lead us to the promise land. Whether it,s Brunell, or Ramsey, or Campbell or some other QB This is what coach means by CORE REDSKINS in the mean time we must continue to be the Greatest Fans In the NFL and stand by our Team and our Coach !!!
NUFF SAID
Hail to the Redskins
Skinfomaniac
you're right that one man doens't make a team, but one man can ruin it, and right now i'm not sure we having a starting caliber QB. If we had a kitna or griese right now, i think we'd be 10-6 and playoff bound easily. QB is clearly our biggest question mark and weakest position as far as realized potential.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2005, 10:24 AM   #193
gortiz
Special Teams
 
gortiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 498
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by steveo395
Gibbs said it in the press conference
i hate brunell!!!!
where does he live....im gonna go kill him

http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=10258

die!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm so glad you didn't find his house man! whew ...
__________________
"If people are underestimating us," Jansen said, "there will be a rude awakening this year."
gortiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2005, 10:29 AM   #194
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Brunell Starting

This thread is hilarious to read now.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2005, 10:38 AM   #195
scowan
The Starter
 
scowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 55
Posts: 1,559
Re: Brunell Starting

It is hilarious because I checked out the stats on NFL.com this morning and Brunell is the highest rated passer in the NFC!!!!!! You go Mark! 12 TDs and 2 INT! Oh by the way Santana Moss has more yards than anyone in the receiving category. I doubt Coles will catch him tonight. Ha! Ha!
scowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.79711 seconds with 10 queries