09-14-2005, 01:38 AM | #181 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 234
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Quote:
|
|
Advertisements |
09-14-2005, 01:41 AM | #182 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
09-14-2005, 01:43 AM | #183 |
Assistant Regional Mod
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 44
Posts: 2,958
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Exactly... and if he had been 35 at the time he would've never gotten the chance.
|
09-14-2005, 01:43 AM | #184 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Quote:
How about Tony Banks?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
09-14-2005, 01:45 AM | #185 |
Assistant Regional Mod
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 44
Posts: 2,958
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Hell why dont we go get Kordell Stewart. He was decent once and he's over the hill now...
|
09-14-2005, 01:47 AM | #186 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 234
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Quote:
Speaking of feelings, when the physical tools are not there and you are not in the league of Joe Montana in reading the field and knowing the opponents like the back of your hand you will probably have problems being successful in the NFL. |
|
09-14-2005, 01:57 AM | #187 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 524
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Quote:
__________________
REDSKINS FOR LIFE BEEETCH!!!! |
|
09-14-2005, 02:00 AM | #188 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
09-14-2005, 02:05 AM | #189 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 234
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Speaking of feelings, I think that the Redskins knew that Hassleback more than likely did not have what it takes to be a starter in the NFL anytime soon.
|
09-14-2005, 02:32 AM | #190 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Quote:
funny how a couple preseason games can make veteran Warpathers do complete 180s. talk about short sighted. |
|
09-14-2005, 02:50 AM | #191 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12
|
Re: Brunell Starting
BLAH BLAH BLAH !!!!
we seem to forget one man does not make a team, Gentelmen. (and i use that term loosely!!) Coach Gibbs is searching just like the rest of us for a answer and until they come together as a unit it will continue to Falter!! think back to Ryp and that superbowl team and tell me they didnt work as a unit, its time for all to step up and want to be The Washington Redskins!!! one of the best franchises, led by one of the best Coaches to ever coach the game!!!The right man will step up and lead us to the promise land. Whether it,s Brunell, or Ramsey, or Campbell or some other QB This is what coach means by CORE REDSKINS in the mean time we must continue to be the Greatest Fans In the NFL and stand by our Team and our Coach !!! NUFF SAID Hail to the Redskins Skinfomaniac |
09-14-2005, 07:59 AM | #192 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Quote:
|
|
10-24-2005, 10:24 AM | #193 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 498
|
Re: Brunell Starting
Quote:
__________________
"If people are underestimating us," Jansen said, "there will be a rude awakening this year." |
|
10-24-2005, 10:29 AM | #194 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Brunell Starting
This thread is hilarious to read now.
|
10-24-2005, 10:38 AM | #195 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 55
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: Brunell Starting
It is hilarious because I checked out the stats on NFL.com this morning and Brunell is the highest rated passer in the NFC!!!!!! You go Mark! 12 TDs and 2 INT! Oh by the way Santana Moss has more yards than anyone in the receiving category. I doubt Coles will catch him tonight. Ha! Ha!
|
|
|