Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


We've got big trouble on the OL.

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-01-2012, 12:03 PM   #181
mbedner3420
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
To add to this.


LL ‏@LL_HTTR247

Brown will be out for a couple weeks but will not go on IR. Looks like 5-8.



Between 5 and 8 weeks. I'm like a few people up here, you really can't count on Brown's health lasting at all.
We honestly should just cut ties with Brown now. I don't see him being anything other than a detriment to the stability of the O-line this year (and in the future).
mbedner3420 is offline  

Advertisements
Old 08-01-2012, 12:06 PM   #182
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Crompton has slightly less than zero chance...unless (heaven forbid) there is some disastrous injury
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 12:07 PM   #183
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Brown could be back by the opener, really
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 12:18 PM   #184
InsaneBoost
The Starter
 
InsaneBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DC
Age: 36
Posts: 1,300
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Rookies going to be thrown right into the fire.
__________________

InsaneBoost is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 12:30 PM   #185
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

For the hypothetical crowd:
Long term would you rather have Massie and a late round rookie backup QB or Cousins and a 2013 2nd round RT draft pick?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 12:35 PM   #186
mbedner3420
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
For the hypothetical crowd:
Long term would you rather have Massie and a late round rookie backup QB or Cousins and a 2013 2nd round RT draft pick?
I like the Cousins move. I just wished that some of the moves we were attempting to make during the offseason would have panned out. Can't control everything though...
mbedner3420 is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 12:43 PM   #187
RGIII
Registered User
 
RGIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by InsaneBoost View Post
Rookies going to be thrown right into the fire.
Sink or swim.
RGIII is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 12:48 PM   #188
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,382
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Ross Tucker said several weeks ago, it is amazing how many teams have OL and secondary issues, and I agree with that. There seems to be a bit of lacking in the "named talent" of the OL pool. Add to that the fact that consistency among the line is a key ingredient to any successful line, and I think our guys who came on at the end of last year ought to be given every opportunity to show what they can do this year.
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 01:06 PM   #189
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
If you're making an argument about improving the receiving options no one would disagree with you.
But, I think the more applicable question is which position RT or WR played at higher level/lower level?.
I absolutely agree. I believe that the real limiting factor to this offense was not the O-Line play but the play of the receivers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
There is a difference between assessment of a unit like the OL vs an assessment of the individual players.
Again, I agree. We appear to disagree as to the assessment of each unit. As a unit, I think the O-Line performed better and was less of a limitation on the offense than the WR corp. Further, IMHO, the addition of a better indidvidual RT would not enhance the performance of the line as much as the addition of a game-breaking WR would enhance the receiver corp. The difference an individual can make within each unit is, in part, due to the nature the positions. An average RT's weaknesses can be covered up/limited as part of the entire line's play in ways that an individual receiver can't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
This is the crux of the decision.
There seems to be the implication that there hands were tied.
When the reality is they made a choice.
I agree it was a choice. I think it was the right choice. You & I appear to disagree. I don't remember if it was you, Goat or Chico talking about the limiting factors on offense, but it seems clear to me that the WR's were a significantly bigger limitation to this offense then O-Line was or, specifically, the RT was. Because of that, rather than prioritize a RT, the FO made the more reasonable choice of trying to obtain a WR who could be a game breaker.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
I like Cousins as a prospect. But its a whole other discussion whether there was a need to develop a back-up from this draft. Cousins pick strikes me more as 'amassing talent rather then building a team'. (Bellichick IIRC)].
Except that people keep saying, as part of this discussion, the 3rd or 4th round pick should have been a tackle and that Cousins was a luxury pick. Again, I disagree. The general consensus is that drafting for need over BPA gets you into trouble. It would be a different discussion if there was someone on the board at RT that they thought could start this year (maybe next) - but I don't think that's the case. By my count, 10 tackles had come been selected before we took LeRib. Either 12 or 13 had been selected before Cousins. IMHO, that player would not be part of our discussion here. Zebrie Sanders and Massie may prove me wrong but, then, hindsight is 20/20.
The faster Cousins develops, the faster our drop-off at QB becomes less catastrophic. The faster a RT chosen instead would have developed, the faster our line play becomes slightly better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
We had 3 young players that showed they could come into a game and not vomit on themself.
They played well, given the situation they were thrust into.
But, that doesn't make them starting caliber they are still unknown quantities as long term starters.
They proved themselves to be solid depth anything beyond that is a hope.
Much like Jammal Brown playing better and staying healthy is a hope.
Well, yes, of course it was a hope. I believe it was a reasonable hope given their performance - as young players with upside and, now, starting experience - that they would be more likely to step up to be average or better at the RT position than Hankerson, Moss, Banks or Austin would turn into a game breaking WR. Given the multiple off-season needs, you have to make some choices. Again, I thought the FO choice, given the in-game performances last year, was perfectly reasonable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
The safeties and nickelback are question marks heading into the season.
Question marks is putting it kindly. Our front seven better get to the QB quick.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 01:13 PM   #190
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

I agree w/ cutting Brown now. This guy gets more gimpy each year and if anything he just breaks up whatever "consistency" we could have across the oline by starting one of the younger guys.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 01:18 PM   #191
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

The one constant bit of encouragement I have about our oline issues is Mike's history of producing quality lines.

Also, giving Polumbus the "start" now could give him time to raise his game, if indeed he's struggling so far as reported. Push him hard and see what happens.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 02:05 PM   #192
KI Skins Fan
Pro Bowl
 
KI Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,396
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
For the hypothetical crowd:
Long term would you rather have Massie and a late round rookie backup QB or Cousins and a 2013 2nd round RT draft pick?
I feel strongly both ways.
KI Skins Fan is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 02:06 PM   #193
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

And Chris Russell saying Brown's telling him he's not well...so are the days of our lives
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 02:12 PM   #194
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
And Chris Russell saying Brown's telling him he's not well...so are the days of our lives
Funny how a few months--hell even weeks--ago brown said he was feeling the best he had in a while and was doing Yoga. Now this...smh this guy has to go. I'm assuming he won't retire or would he to save us some money.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams"
CultBrennan59 is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 02:13 PM   #195
mbedner3420
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

I think we can all definitively agree that Yoga is a piece of crap.
mbedner3420 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 5.10434 seconds with 10 queries