|
View Poll Results: Biggest surprise cut? | |||
Mason | 53 | 43.44% | |
Frost | 4 | 3.28% | |
McMullen | 54 | 44.26% | |
Mix | 4 | 3.28% | |
Richardson | 2 | 1.64% | |
other | 5 | 4.10% | |
Voters: 122. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-02-2008, 07:33 AM | #151 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
It doesn't matter because they didn't keep six wideouts, but I still don't get all the hate for McMullen. All the guy did was catch passes when he was on the field and people act as though he should have been a one-man wrecking crew.
I'm not sure what else McMullen could have done to impress. Sounds like some people just don't like him. |
Advertisements |
09-02-2008, 07:50 AM | #152 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
09-02-2008, 08:10 AM | #153 |
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 45
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
Why did Mason sign with B-More's practice squad instead of with ours?
|
09-02-2008, 08:16 AM | #154 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 45
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
|
09-02-2008, 09:55 AM | #155 | |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
Quote:
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
09-02-2008, 10:27 AM | #156 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
Quote:
|
|
09-02-2008, 11:22 AM | #157 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
I think the problem is how they performed in preseason if they even played at all. I think we could point to a few better players who got cut over a drafted rookie. Take Frost for example some would say he had experience and outperformed Brooks for that job. Brooks got the job and we really do not know how this will work out.
|
09-02-2008, 11:25 AM | #158 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
The Frost deal was such a joke. Yes he outperformed Brooks but it wasn't by much. Certainly not enough to justify cutting a 6th round pick for a guy who's been consistently inconsistent for us.
|
09-02-2008, 11:33 AM | #159 | |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
Quote:
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
09-02-2008, 11:35 AM | #160 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 41
Posts: 17,511
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
JLC's thoughts on football seem like those of someone who doesn't really understand the game or league lately :/
insisting frost would make it, saying ecker made the PS (why would he with cooley and davis and yoder already onboard... there's just no need). thirteen posts saying backup DL guys will play if the starters are still hurt (REALLY??). minor, but consistently grating. |
09-02-2008, 04:30 PM | #161 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 573
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
I thought maybe the Redskins would find a way to keep McMullen and Mix but...
I ws surprised to read that Frost was picked up by Green Bay. |
09-02-2008, 04:37 PM | #162 |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
You can't judge a draft pick solely on how they performed in preseason. They just got in the league. Give em time to develop. Judge the 08 draft in 2010, not a week after the preseason.
|
09-03-2008, 02:22 PM | #163 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 53
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
But it wasn't a good draft. That's the point. They're trying to pretend it is. If the Redskins were 4 - 12 last year, it would make sense, but they've been telling us they want continuity all along. And why does Jason Campbell have to be the one to tell those two turds to show up on time and study? You would think that Vinny Cerrato would feel some responsibility in that regard since he now has maximum authority.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
09-03-2008, 02:28 PM | #164 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
Quote:
As for your comment on JC talking to the rookie WRs we really don't know what has been said to them behind closed doors and by who. Why do you assume that JC is the only one that has talked to them? |
|
09-03-2008, 02:47 PM | #165 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,202
|
Re: Official Cut Day Discussion Thread
Quote:
First, we got(I am talking only in college terms now) a top punter, 2 top WR and a strong TE, a decent OL, and a standout QB - that's a good draft. Second, the Skins were a good team last year with all but one of their starters back, now is a GOOD time to get some youth in, let them learn the speed of the game. We did not NEED an impact player(always nice to find one if you can) Finally, next year all ten may be cut and then a bad draft it will have been, but for filling the backup positions with players who are in their prime learning days to learn from our best, and build on the Redskins traditions that Joe Gibbs et al brought back, I think this year could be a watershed that leads to Dan's first trophy. Thanks for listening Last edited by CRedskinsRule; 09-03-2008 at 02:49 PM. Reason: forgot a word... |
|
|
|